Cargando…
The Activities and Impact of State Programs to Address Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, 2011–2014
In 2011, the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC), at the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), released a three-year funding opportunity announcement (FOA) for a competitive, non-research cooperative agreement. The agreement enhanced the capacities of state hea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27417805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare3040948 |
_version_ | 1782441368637931520 |
---|---|
author | Trivers, Katrina F. Rodriguez, Juan L. Cox, Summer L. Crane, Barbara E. Duquette, Debra |
author_facet | Trivers, Katrina F. Rodriguez, Juan L. Cox, Summer L. Crane, Barbara E. Duquette, Debra |
author_sort | Trivers, Katrina F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2011, the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC), at the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), released a three-year funding opportunity announcement (FOA) for a competitive, non-research cooperative agreement. The agreement enhanced the capacities of state health departments to promote the application of best practices for evidence-based breast cancer genomics through education, surveillance, and policy activities. The FOA required that applicants focus on activities related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). The DCPC funded three states: Georgia, Michigan, and Oregon. Georgia was a first-time recipient of cancer genomics funding, whereas Michigan and Oregon had long standing activities in cancer genomics and had received CDC funding in the past. By the end of the funding period, each state had well-functioning and impactful state-based programs in breast cancer genomics. This article highlights the impact of a few key state activities by using CDC’s Science Impact Framework. There were challenges to implementing public health genomics programs, including the need to develop relevant partnerships, the highly technical nature of the subject matter, a lack of genetic services in certain areas, and the difficulty in funding genetic services. Georgia, Michigan, and Oregon have served as models for others interested in initiating or expanding cancer genomics programs, and they helped to determine what works well for promoting and integrating public health genomics into existing systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4934623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49346232016-07-12 The Activities and Impact of State Programs to Address Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, 2011–2014 Trivers, Katrina F. Rodriguez, Juan L. Cox, Summer L. Crane, Barbara E. Duquette, Debra Healthcare (Basel) Article In 2011, the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC), at the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), released a three-year funding opportunity announcement (FOA) for a competitive, non-research cooperative agreement. The agreement enhanced the capacities of state health departments to promote the application of best practices for evidence-based breast cancer genomics through education, surveillance, and policy activities. The FOA required that applicants focus on activities related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). The DCPC funded three states: Georgia, Michigan, and Oregon. Georgia was a first-time recipient of cancer genomics funding, whereas Michigan and Oregon had long standing activities in cancer genomics and had received CDC funding in the past. By the end of the funding period, each state had well-functioning and impactful state-based programs in breast cancer genomics. This article highlights the impact of a few key state activities by using CDC’s Science Impact Framework. There were challenges to implementing public health genomics programs, including the need to develop relevant partnerships, the highly technical nature of the subject matter, a lack of genetic services in certain areas, and the difficulty in funding genetic services. Georgia, Michigan, and Oregon have served as models for others interested in initiating or expanding cancer genomics programs, and they helped to determine what works well for promoting and integrating public health genomics into existing systems. MDPI 2015-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4934623/ /pubmed/27417805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare3040948 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Trivers, Katrina F. Rodriguez, Juan L. Cox, Summer L. Crane, Barbara E. Duquette, Debra The Activities and Impact of State Programs to Address Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, 2011–2014 |
title | The Activities and Impact of State Programs to Address Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, 2011–2014 |
title_full | The Activities and Impact of State Programs to Address Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, 2011–2014 |
title_fullStr | The Activities and Impact of State Programs to Address Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, 2011–2014 |
title_full_unstemmed | The Activities and Impact of State Programs to Address Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, 2011–2014 |
title_short | The Activities and Impact of State Programs to Address Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, 2011–2014 |
title_sort | activities and impact of state programs to address hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, 2011–2014 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27417805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare3040948 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT triverskatrinaf theactivitiesandimpactofstateprogramstoaddresshereditarybreastandovariancancer20112014 AT rodriguezjuanl theactivitiesandimpactofstateprogramstoaddresshereditarybreastandovariancancer20112014 AT coxsummerl theactivitiesandimpactofstateprogramstoaddresshereditarybreastandovariancancer20112014 AT cranebarbarae theactivitiesandimpactofstateprogramstoaddresshereditarybreastandovariancancer20112014 AT duquettedebra theactivitiesandimpactofstateprogramstoaddresshereditarybreastandovariancancer20112014 AT triverskatrinaf activitiesandimpactofstateprogramstoaddresshereditarybreastandovariancancer20112014 AT rodriguezjuanl activitiesandimpactofstateprogramstoaddresshereditarybreastandovariancancer20112014 AT coxsummerl activitiesandimpactofstateprogramstoaddresshereditarybreastandovariancancer20112014 AT cranebarbarae activitiesandimpactofstateprogramstoaddresshereditarybreastandovariancancer20112014 AT duquettedebra activitiesandimpactofstateprogramstoaddresshereditarybreastandovariancancer20112014 |