Cargando…

Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze

A popular model of the function of selective visual attention involves search where a single target is to be found among distractors. For many scenarios, a more realistic model involves search for multiple targets of various types, since natural tasks typically do not involve a single target. Here w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jóhannesson, Ómar I., Thornton, Ian M., Smith, Irene J., Chetverikov, Andrey, Kristjánsson, Árni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669516637279
_version_ 1782441376554680320
author Jóhannesson, Ómar I.
Thornton, Ian M.
Smith, Irene J.
Chetverikov, Andrey
Kristjánsson, Árni
author_facet Jóhannesson, Ómar I.
Thornton, Ian M.
Smith, Irene J.
Chetverikov, Andrey
Kristjánsson, Árni
author_sort Jóhannesson, Ómar I.
collection PubMed
description A popular model of the function of selective visual attention involves search where a single target is to be found among distractors. For many scenarios, a more realistic model involves search for multiple targets of various types, since natural tasks typically do not involve a single target. Here we present results from a novel multiple-target foraging paradigm. We compare finger foraging where observers cancel a set of predesignated targets by tapping them, to gaze foraging where observers cancel items by fixating them for 100 ms. During finger foraging, for most observers, there was a large difference between foraging based on a single feature, where observers switch easily between target types, and foraging based on a conjunction of features where observers tended to stick to one target type. The pattern was notably different during gaze foraging where these condition differences were smaller. Two conclusions follow: (a) The fact that a sizeable number of observers (in particular during gaze foraging) had little trouble switching between different target types raises challenges for many prominent theoretical accounts of visual attention and working memory. (b) While caveats must be noted for the comparison of gaze and finger foraging, the results suggest that selection mechanisms for gaze and pointing have different operational constraints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4934673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49346732016-07-18 Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze Jóhannesson, Ómar I. Thornton, Ian M. Smith, Irene J. Chetverikov, Andrey Kristjánsson, Árni Iperception Article A popular model of the function of selective visual attention involves search where a single target is to be found among distractors. For many scenarios, a more realistic model involves search for multiple targets of various types, since natural tasks typically do not involve a single target. Here we present results from a novel multiple-target foraging paradigm. We compare finger foraging where observers cancel a set of predesignated targets by tapping them, to gaze foraging where observers cancel items by fixating them for 100 ms. During finger foraging, for most observers, there was a large difference between foraging based on a single feature, where observers switch easily between target types, and foraging based on a conjunction of features where observers tended to stick to one target type. The pattern was notably different during gaze foraging where these condition differences were smaller. Two conclusions follow: (a) The fact that a sizeable number of observers (in particular during gaze foraging) had little trouble switching between different target types raises challenges for many prominent theoretical accounts of visual attention and working memory. (b) While caveats must be noted for the comparison of gaze and finger foraging, the results suggest that selection mechanisms for gaze and pointing have different operational constraints. SAGE Publications 2016-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4934673/ /pubmed/27433323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669516637279 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Jóhannesson, Ómar I.
Thornton, Ian M.
Smith, Irene J.
Chetverikov, Andrey
Kristjánsson, Árni
Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze
title Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze
title_full Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze
title_fullStr Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze
title_full_unstemmed Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze
title_short Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze
title_sort visual foraging with fingers and eye gaze
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669516637279
work_keys_str_mv AT johannessonomari visualforagingwithfingersandeyegaze
AT thorntonianm visualforagingwithfingersandeyegaze
AT smithirenej visualforagingwithfingersandeyegaze
AT chetverikovandrey visualforagingwithfingersandeyegaze
AT kristjanssonarni visualforagingwithfingersandeyegaze