Cargando…

Is anterior cruciate ligament surgery technique important in rehabilitation and activity scores?

To compare the two different anterior cruciate ligament surgery techniques’ effect in rehabilitation and activity performance. Fifty-five patients were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients with transtibial technique (TT), 28 with anatomic single-bundle technique (AT) included. Tegner Activity Scale (TAS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kilinc, Bekir Eray, Kara, Adnan, Celik, Haluk, Oc, Yunus, Camur, Savas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27419120
http://dx.doi.org/10.12965/jer.1632614.307
_version_ 1782441409961263104
author Kilinc, Bekir Eray
Kara, Adnan
Celik, Haluk
Oc, Yunus
Camur, Savas
author_facet Kilinc, Bekir Eray
Kara, Adnan
Celik, Haluk
Oc, Yunus
Camur, Savas
author_sort Kilinc, Bekir Eray
collection PubMed
description To compare the two different anterior cruciate ligament surgery techniques’ effect in rehabilitation and activity performance. Fifty-five patients were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients with transtibial technique (TT), 28 with anatomic single-bundle technique (AT) included. Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) was performed at preoperation and follow-up. The returning time of the sport and work was evaluated at follow-up. Single-leg hop test was performed at follow-up. Outcomes were compared between the two groups. The determined length difference between the operated knee and the intact knee was compared between the two groups. Average age of TT and AT was 27.9±6.4 yr, 28.3±6 yr, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups in duration of returning to sport. TT group had higher duration to return to sport (P<0.01). No difference between the two groups in duration of returning to work (P>0.05). There was a significant difference between the two groups. TT group had significantly higher values than AT group (P<0.01). No difference in TAS between the two techniques at preoperation and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The increase of TAS in patients who had AT was higher than the patients who had TT (P>0.05). No difference in single-leg hop test at 55%–65%, 65%–75%, and 85%–95% level (P>0.05). In this test at 75%–85% TT group had higher values than AT group (P<0.05), AT group had higher values at 95%–105% level (P<0.05). Good short and long-term knee outcome scores depend on rehabilitation protocol after surgery. Surgery technique should provide the adequate stability in rehabilitation period. AT obtains better outcomes in rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4934969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49349692016-07-14 Is anterior cruciate ligament surgery technique important in rehabilitation and activity scores? Kilinc, Bekir Eray Kara, Adnan Celik, Haluk Oc, Yunus Camur, Savas J Exerc Rehabil Original Article To compare the two different anterior cruciate ligament surgery techniques’ effect in rehabilitation and activity performance. Fifty-five patients were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients with transtibial technique (TT), 28 with anatomic single-bundle technique (AT) included. Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) was performed at preoperation and follow-up. The returning time of the sport and work was evaluated at follow-up. Single-leg hop test was performed at follow-up. Outcomes were compared between the two groups. The determined length difference between the operated knee and the intact knee was compared between the two groups. Average age of TT and AT was 27.9±6.4 yr, 28.3±6 yr, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups in duration of returning to sport. TT group had higher duration to return to sport (P<0.01). No difference between the two groups in duration of returning to work (P>0.05). There was a significant difference between the two groups. TT group had significantly higher values than AT group (P<0.01). No difference in TAS between the two techniques at preoperation and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The increase of TAS in patients who had AT was higher than the patients who had TT (P>0.05). No difference in single-leg hop test at 55%–65%, 65%–75%, and 85%–95% level (P>0.05). In this test at 75%–85% TT group had higher values than AT group (P<0.05), AT group had higher values at 95%–105% level (P<0.05). Good short and long-term knee outcome scores depend on rehabilitation protocol after surgery. Surgery technique should provide the adequate stability in rehabilitation period. AT obtains better outcomes in rehabilitation. Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4934969/ /pubmed/27419120 http://dx.doi.org/10.12965/jer.1632614.307 Text en Copyright © 2016 Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kilinc, Bekir Eray
Kara, Adnan
Celik, Haluk
Oc, Yunus
Camur, Savas
Is anterior cruciate ligament surgery technique important in rehabilitation and activity scores?
title Is anterior cruciate ligament surgery technique important in rehabilitation and activity scores?
title_full Is anterior cruciate ligament surgery technique important in rehabilitation and activity scores?
title_fullStr Is anterior cruciate ligament surgery technique important in rehabilitation and activity scores?
title_full_unstemmed Is anterior cruciate ligament surgery technique important in rehabilitation and activity scores?
title_short Is anterior cruciate ligament surgery technique important in rehabilitation and activity scores?
title_sort is anterior cruciate ligament surgery technique important in rehabilitation and activity scores?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27419120
http://dx.doi.org/10.12965/jer.1632614.307
work_keys_str_mv AT kilincbekireray isanteriorcruciateligamentsurgerytechniqueimportantinrehabilitationandactivityscores
AT karaadnan isanteriorcruciateligamentsurgerytechniqueimportantinrehabilitationandactivityscores
AT celikhaluk isanteriorcruciateligamentsurgerytechniqueimportantinrehabilitationandactivityscores
AT ocyunus isanteriorcruciateligamentsurgerytechniqueimportantinrehabilitationandactivityscores
AT camursavas isanteriorcruciateligamentsurgerytechniqueimportantinrehabilitationandactivityscores