Cargando…

Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Decipher test in predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. METHODS: We identified 1,987 consecutive patients with RP who received the Decipher test between February and August 2015 (contemporary cohort). In the contemp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hak J, Yousefi, Kasra, Haddad, Zaid, Abdollah, Firas, Lam, Lucia LC, Shin, Heesun, Alshalalfa, Mohammed, Godebu, Elana, Wang, Song, Shabaik, Ahmed, Davicioni, Elai, Kane, Christopher J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4935177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27419104
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S99997
_version_ 1782441419412078592
author Lee, Hak J
Yousefi, Kasra
Haddad, Zaid
Abdollah, Firas
Lam, Lucia LC
Shin, Heesun
Alshalalfa, Mohammed
Godebu, Elana
Wang, Song
Shabaik, Ahmed
Davicioni, Elai
Kane, Christopher J
author_facet Lee, Hak J
Yousefi, Kasra
Haddad, Zaid
Abdollah, Firas
Lam, Lucia LC
Shin, Heesun
Alshalalfa, Mohammed
Godebu, Elana
Wang, Song
Shabaik, Ahmed
Davicioni, Elai
Kane, Christopher J
author_sort Lee, Hak J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Decipher test in predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. METHODS: We identified 1,987 consecutive patients with RP who received the Decipher test between February and August 2015 (contemporary cohort). In the contemporary cohort, only the Decipher score from RP specimens was available for analysis. In addition, we identified a consecutive cohort of patients treated with RP between 2006 and 2012 at the University of California, San Diego, with LNI upon pathologic examination (retrospective cohort). The retrospective cohort yielded seven, 22, and 18 tissue specimens from prostate biopsy, RP, and lymph nodes (LNs) for individual patients, respectively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the performance of Decipher in the contemporary cohort with LNI as the endpoint. In the retrospective cohort, concordance of risk groups was assessed using validated cut-points for low (<0.45), intermediate (0.45–0.60), and high (>0.60) Decipher scores. RESULTS: In the contemporary cohort, 51 (2.6%) patients had LNI. Decipher had an odds ratio of 1.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.46–2.05) and 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.19–1.7) per 10% increase in score on univariable and multivariable (adjusting for pathologic Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion), respectively. No significant difference in the clinical and pathologic characteristics between the LN positive patients of contemporary and retrospective cohorts was observed (all P>0.05). Accordingly, among LN-positive patients in the contemporary cohort and retrospective cohort, 80% and 77% had Decipher high risk scores (P=1). In the retrospective cohort, prostate biopsy cores with the highest Gleason grade and percentage of tumor involvement had 86% Decipher risk concordance with both RP and LN specimens. CONCLUSION: Decipher scores were highly concordant between pre- and post-surgical specimens. Further, Decipher scores from RP tissue were predictive of LNI at RP. If validated in a larger cohort of prostate biopsy specimens for prediction of adverse pathology at RP, Decipher may be useful for improved pre-operative staging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4935177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49351772016-07-14 Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis Lee, Hak J Yousefi, Kasra Haddad, Zaid Abdollah, Firas Lam, Lucia LC Shin, Heesun Alshalalfa, Mohammed Godebu, Elana Wang, Song Shabaik, Ahmed Davicioni, Elai Kane, Christopher J Res Rep Urol Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Decipher test in predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. METHODS: We identified 1,987 consecutive patients with RP who received the Decipher test between February and August 2015 (contemporary cohort). In the contemporary cohort, only the Decipher score from RP specimens was available for analysis. In addition, we identified a consecutive cohort of patients treated with RP between 2006 and 2012 at the University of California, San Diego, with LNI upon pathologic examination (retrospective cohort). The retrospective cohort yielded seven, 22, and 18 tissue specimens from prostate biopsy, RP, and lymph nodes (LNs) for individual patients, respectively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the performance of Decipher in the contemporary cohort with LNI as the endpoint. In the retrospective cohort, concordance of risk groups was assessed using validated cut-points for low (<0.45), intermediate (0.45–0.60), and high (>0.60) Decipher scores. RESULTS: In the contemporary cohort, 51 (2.6%) patients had LNI. Decipher had an odds ratio of 1.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.46–2.05) and 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.19–1.7) per 10% increase in score on univariable and multivariable (adjusting for pathologic Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion), respectively. No significant difference in the clinical and pathologic characteristics between the LN positive patients of contemporary and retrospective cohorts was observed (all P>0.05). Accordingly, among LN-positive patients in the contemporary cohort and retrospective cohort, 80% and 77% had Decipher high risk scores (P=1). In the retrospective cohort, prostate biopsy cores with the highest Gleason grade and percentage of tumor involvement had 86% Decipher risk concordance with both RP and LN specimens. CONCLUSION: Decipher scores were highly concordant between pre- and post-surgical specimens. Further, Decipher scores from RP tissue were predictive of LNI at RP. If validated in a larger cohort of prostate biopsy specimens for prediction of adverse pathology at RP, Decipher may be useful for improved pre-operative staging. Dove Medical Press 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4935177/ /pubmed/27419104 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S99997 Text en © 2016 Lee et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lee, Hak J
Yousefi, Kasra
Haddad, Zaid
Abdollah, Firas
Lam, Lucia LC
Shin, Heesun
Alshalalfa, Mohammed
Godebu, Elana
Wang, Song
Shabaik, Ahmed
Davicioni, Elai
Kane, Christopher J
Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis
title Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis
title_full Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis
title_fullStr Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis
title_short Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis
title_sort evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4935177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27419104
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S99997
work_keys_str_mv AT leehakj evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT yousefikasra evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT haddadzaid evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT abdollahfiras evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT lamlucialc evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT shinheesun evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT alshalalfamohammed evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT godebuelana evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT wangsong evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT shabaikahmed evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT davicionielai evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis
AT kanechristopherj evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis