Cargando…
Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Decipher test in predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. METHODS: We identified 1,987 consecutive patients with RP who received the Decipher test between February and August 2015 (contemporary cohort). In the contemp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4935177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27419104 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S99997 |
_version_ | 1782441419412078592 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Hak J Yousefi, Kasra Haddad, Zaid Abdollah, Firas Lam, Lucia LC Shin, Heesun Alshalalfa, Mohammed Godebu, Elana Wang, Song Shabaik, Ahmed Davicioni, Elai Kane, Christopher J |
author_facet | Lee, Hak J Yousefi, Kasra Haddad, Zaid Abdollah, Firas Lam, Lucia LC Shin, Heesun Alshalalfa, Mohammed Godebu, Elana Wang, Song Shabaik, Ahmed Davicioni, Elai Kane, Christopher J |
author_sort | Lee, Hak J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Decipher test in predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. METHODS: We identified 1,987 consecutive patients with RP who received the Decipher test between February and August 2015 (contemporary cohort). In the contemporary cohort, only the Decipher score from RP specimens was available for analysis. In addition, we identified a consecutive cohort of patients treated with RP between 2006 and 2012 at the University of California, San Diego, with LNI upon pathologic examination (retrospective cohort). The retrospective cohort yielded seven, 22, and 18 tissue specimens from prostate biopsy, RP, and lymph nodes (LNs) for individual patients, respectively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the performance of Decipher in the contemporary cohort with LNI as the endpoint. In the retrospective cohort, concordance of risk groups was assessed using validated cut-points for low (<0.45), intermediate (0.45–0.60), and high (>0.60) Decipher scores. RESULTS: In the contemporary cohort, 51 (2.6%) patients had LNI. Decipher had an odds ratio of 1.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.46–2.05) and 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.19–1.7) per 10% increase in score on univariable and multivariable (adjusting for pathologic Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion), respectively. No significant difference in the clinical and pathologic characteristics between the LN positive patients of contemporary and retrospective cohorts was observed (all P>0.05). Accordingly, among LN-positive patients in the contemporary cohort and retrospective cohort, 80% and 77% had Decipher high risk scores (P=1). In the retrospective cohort, prostate biopsy cores with the highest Gleason grade and percentage of tumor involvement had 86% Decipher risk concordance with both RP and LN specimens. CONCLUSION: Decipher scores were highly concordant between pre- and post-surgical specimens. Further, Decipher scores from RP tissue were predictive of LNI at RP. If validated in a larger cohort of prostate biopsy specimens for prediction of adverse pathology at RP, Decipher may be useful for improved pre-operative staging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4935177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49351772016-07-14 Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis Lee, Hak J Yousefi, Kasra Haddad, Zaid Abdollah, Firas Lam, Lucia LC Shin, Heesun Alshalalfa, Mohammed Godebu, Elana Wang, Song Shabaik, Ahmed Davicioni, Elai Kane, Christopher J Res Rep Urol Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Decipher test in predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. METHODS: We identified 1,987 consecutive patients with RP who received the Decipher test between February and August 2015 (contemporary cohort). In the contemporary cohort, only the Decipher score from RP specimens was available for analysis. In addition, we identified a consecutive cohort of patients treated with RP between 2006 and 2012 at the University of California, San Diego, with LNI upon pathologic examination (retrospective cohort). The retrospective cohort yielded seven, 22, and 18 tissue specimens from prostate biopsy, RP, and lymph nodes (LNs) for individual patients, respectively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the performance of Decipher in the contemporary cohort with LNI as the endpoint. In the retrospective cohort, concordance of risk groups was assessed using validated cut-points for low (<0.45), intermediate (0.45–0.60), and high (>0.60) Decipher scores. RESULTS: In the contemporary cohort, 51 (2.6%) patients had LNI. Decipher had an odds ratio of 1.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.46–2.05) and 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.19–1.7) per 10% increase in score on univariable and multivariable (adjusting for pathologic Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion), respectively. No significant difference in the clinical and pathologic characteristics between the LN positive patients of contemporary and retrospective cohorts was observed (all P>0.05). Accordingly, among LN-positive patients in the contemporary cohort and retrospective cohort, 80% and 77% had Decipher high risk scores (P=1). In the retrospective cohort, prostate biopsy cores with the highest Gleason grade and percentage of tumor involvement had 86% Decipher risk concordance with both RP and LN specimens. CONCLUSION: Decipher scores were highly concordant between pre- and post-surgical specimens. Further, Decipher scores from RP tissue were predictive of LNI at RP. If validated in a larger cohort of prostate biopsy specimens for prediction of adverse pathology at RP, Decipher may be useful for improved pre-operative staging. Dove Medical Press 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4935177/ /pubmed/27419104 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S99997 Text en © 2016 Lee et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lee, Hak J Yousefi, Kasra Haddad, Zaid Abdollah, Firas Lam, Lucia LC Shin, Heesun Alshalalfa, Mohammed Godebu, Elana Wang, Song Shabaik, Ahmed Davicioni, Elai Kane, Christopher J Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis |
title | Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis |
title_full | Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis |
title_short | Evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis |
title_sort | evaluation of a genomic classifier in radical prostatectomy patients with lymph node metastasis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4935177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27419104 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S99997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leehakj evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT yousefikasra evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT haddadzaid evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT abdollahfiras evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT lamlucialc evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT shinheesun evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT alshalalfamohammed evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT godebuelana evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT wangsong evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT shabaikahmed evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT davicionielai evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis AT kanechristopherj evaluationofagenomicclassifierinradicalprostatectomypatientswithlymphnodemetastasis |