Cargando…

A cost effective analysis of fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Nigeria: a middle income perspective; using an interactive Markov model

BACKGROUND: The number of Nigerian men presenting with benign prostatic hyperplasia is on the rise because of increase awareness about the ailment. With the renewed effort by the national health insurance scheme to cover the informal sector, it becomes imperative to determine the cost implication fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Udeh, Emeka I., Ofoha, Chimaobi G., Adewole, David A., Nnabugwu, Ikenna I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2431-x
_version_ 1782441500494266368
author Udeh, Emeka I.
Ofoha, Chimaobi G.
Adewole, David A.
Nnabugwu, Ikenna I.
author_facet Udeh, Emeka I.
Ofoha, Chimaobi G.
Adewole, David A.
Nnabugwu, Ikenna I.
author_sort Udeh, Emeka I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of Nigerian men presenting with benign prostatic hyperplasia is on the rise because of increase awareness about the ailment. With the renewed effort by the national health insurance scheme to cover the informal sector, it becomes imperative to determine the cost implication for managing Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and the cost effective drug combination to be adopted. The objective of this study is to estimate cost effective analysis (CEA) of fixed -dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy from the health service provider perspective design. METHODS: An interactive Markov’s model was used to generate incremental cost per QALY and incremental cost per life years gained. 2.9 million Men who were 50 years of age were fed into the model. The outcome measures included: costs of drug treatment, consultation, acute urinary retention (AUR), transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), hospitalisation post TURP, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost per life years gained, and incremental cost per QALY gained. RESULTS: Fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin (FDCT) produced an Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US$1481.92 per Quality adjusted for life-years saved. CONCLUSION: Universal FDCT provision for Nigeria has major economic implications. This study in the context of its limitations has demonstrated the cost effectiveness of FDCT for the long term treatment of patients with moderate to severe BPH from the perspective of a developing country. Currently, there are few studies available to give economic data evidence to policy makers in Nigeria which is applicable to developing countries with similar economies. As such, the findings in this study will be relevant to policy makers in these countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4936011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49360112016-07-07 A cost effective analysis of fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Nigeria: a middle income perspective; using an interactive Markov model Udeh, Emeka I. Ofoha, Chimaobi G. Adewole, David A. Nnabugwu, Ikenna I. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The number of Nigerian men presenting with benign prostatic hyperplasia is on the rise because of increase awareness about the ailment. With the renewed effort by the national health insurance scheme to cover the informal sector, it becomes imperative to determine the cost implication for managing Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and the cost effective drug combination to be adopted. The objective of this study is to estimate cost effective analysis (CEA) of fixed -dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy from the health service provider perspective design. METHODS: An interactive Markov’s model was used to generate incremental cost per QALY and incremental cost per life years gained. 2.9 million Men who were 50 years of age were fed into the model. The outcome measures included: costs of drug treatment, consultation, acute urinary retention (AUR), transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), hospitalisation post TURP, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost per life years gained, and incremental cost per QALY gained. RESULTS: Fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin (FDCT) produced an Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US$1481.92 per Quality adjusted for life-years saved. CONCLUSION: Universal FDCT provision for Nigeria has major economic implications. This study in the context of its limitations has demonstrated the cost effectiveness of FDCT for the long term treatment of patients with moderate to severe BPH from the perspective of a developing country. Currently, there are few studies available to give economic data evidence to policy makers in Nigeria which is applicable to developing countries with similar economies. As such, the findings in this study will be relevant to policy makers in these countries. BioMed Central 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4936011/ /pubmed/27388750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2431-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Udeh, Emeka I.
Ofoha, Chimaobi G.
Adewole, David A.
Nnabugwu, Ikenna I.
A cost effective analysis of fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Nigeria: a middle income perspective; using an interactive Markov model
title A cost effective analysis of fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Nigeria: a middle income perspective; using an interactive Markov model
title_full A cost effective analysis of fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Nigeria: a middle income perspective; using an interactive Markov model
title_fullStr A cost effective analysis of fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Nigeria: a middle income perspective; using an interactive Markov model
title_full_unstemmed A cost effective analysis of fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Nigeria: a middle income perspective; using an interactive Markov model
title_short A cost effective analysis of fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Nigeria: a middle income perspective; using an interactive Markov model
title_sort cost effective analysis of fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin compared with dutasteride monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in nigeria: a middle income perspective; using an interactive markov model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2431-x
work_keys_str_mv AT udehemekai acosteffectiveanalysisoffixeddosecombinationofdutasterideandtamsulosincomparedwithdutasteridemonotherapyforbenignprostatichyperplasiainnigeriaamiddleincomeperspectiveusinganinteractivemarkovmodel
AT ofohachimaobig acosteffectiveanalysisoffixeddosecombinationofdutasterideandtamsulosincomparedwithdutasteridemonotherapyforbenignprostatichyperplasiainnigeriaamiddleincomeperspectiveusinganinteractivemarkovmodel
AT adewoledavida acosteffectiveanalysisoffixeddosecombinationofdutasterideandtamsulosincomparedwithdutasteridemonotherapyforbenignprostatichyperplasiainnigeriaamiddleincomeperspectiveusinganinteractivemarkovmodel
AT nnabugwuikennai acosteffectiveanalysisoffixeddosecombinationofdutasterideandtamsulosincomparedwithdutasteridemonotherapyforbenignprostatichyperplasiainnigeriaamiddleincomeperspectiveusinganinteractivemarkovmodel
AT udehemekai costeffectiveanalysisoffixeddosecombinationofdutasterideandtamsulosincomparedwithdutasteridemonotherapyforbenignprostatichyperplasiainnigeriaamiddleincomeperspectiveusinganinteractivemarkovmodel
AT ofohachimaobig costeffectiveanalysisoffixeddosecombinationofdutasterideandtamsulosincomparedwithdutasteridemonotherapyforbenignprostatichyperplasiainnigeriaamiddleincomeperspectiveusinganinteractivemarkovmodel
AT adewoledavida costeffectiveanalysisoffixeddosecombinationofdutasterideandtamsulosincomparedwithdutasteridemonotherapyforbenignprostatichyperplasiainnigeriaamiddleincomeperspectiveusinganinteractivemarkovmodel
AT nnabugwuikennai costeffectiveanalysisoffixeddosecombinationofdutasterideandtamsulosincomparedwithdutasteridemonotherapyforbenignprostatichyperplasiainnigeriaamiddleincomeperspectiveusinganinteractivemarkovmodel