Cargando…

Spontaneous ureteric rupture, a reality or a faux pas?

BACKGROUND: Rupture of the urinary collecting system with or without any perinephric extravasation is an extremely rare occurrence and usually known to occur following an obstructive pathology. Spontaneous or non-traumatic rupture, in the absence of any distal obstruction, though reported in literat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aggarwal, Gaurav, Adhikary, Samiran Das
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-016-0158-2
_version_ 1782441513501851648
author Aggarwal, Gaurav
Adhikary, Samiran Das
author_facet Aggarwal, Gaurav
Adhikary, Samiran Das
author_sort Aggarwal, Gaurav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rupture of the urinary collecting system with or without any perinephric extravasation is an extremely rare occurrence and usually known to occur following an obstructive pathology. Spontaneous or non-traumatic rupture, in the absence of any distal obstruction, though reported in literature, is not yet a proven entity and needs to be distinguished from physiological forniceal rupture, to validate its occurrence. Our case illustrates that spontaneous ureteric rupture does exist and requires a high level of vigil for prompt diagnosis and early simple management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65 year old non diabetic gentleman presented with a 2 day history of right sided severe abdominal pain with no history of any prior trauma, surgery, urinary retention or calculus disease. His ultrasound whole-abdomen was suggestive of increased liver echogenicity, but his contrast enhanced CT scan (CECT) documented a ureteric rupture, with leakage of contrast from the upper ureters, well away from the renal pelvis He was promptly managed with cysto-ureteroscopy, retrograde pyelography (RGP) and double-J (DJ) stenting. His post operative course was uneventful and he was discharged on the second post operative day, without event. An RGP at 6 weeks of follow up showed no contrast extravasation from the ureter and his DJ stent was removed without event. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous ureteric rupture, in the absence of any inciting cause, is an entity which exists and is easily manageable, once diagnosed timely. Thus, the need to maintain a high index of vigil, in order to identify this clinically entity at the earnest, institute prompt treatment and hence ensure that a “spontaneous” rupture, doesn’t become a “faux pas” in the true sense of the word.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4936092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49360922016-07-07 Spontaneous ureteric rupture, a reality or a faux pas? Aggarwal, Gaurav Adhikary, Samiran Das BMC Urol Case Report BACKGROUND: Rupture of the urinary collecting system with or without any perinephric extravasation is an extremely rare occurrence and usually known to occur following an obstructive pathology. Spontaneous or non-traumatic rupture, in the absence of any distal obstruction, though reported in literature, is not yet a proven entity and needs to be distinguished from physiological forniceal rupture, to validate its occurrence. Our case illustrates that spontaneous ureteric rupture does exist and requires a high level of vigil for prompt diagnosis and early simple management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65 year old non diabetic gentleman presented with a 2 day history of right sided severe abdominal pain with no history of any prior trauma, surgery, urinary retention or calculus disease. His ultrasound whole-abdomen was suggestive of increased liver echogenicity, but his contrast enhanced CT scan (CECT) documented a ureteric rupture, with leakage of contrast from the upper ureters, well away from the renal pelvis He was promptly managed with cysto-ureteroscopy, retrograde pyelography (RGP) and double-J (DJ) stenting. His post operative course was uneventful and he was discharged on the second post operative day, without event. An RGP at 6 weeks of follow up showed no contrast extravasation from the ureter and his DJ stent was removed without event. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous ureteric rupture, in the absence of any inciting cause, is an entity which exists and is easily manageable, once diagnosed timely. Thus, the need to maintain a high index of vigil, in order to identify this clinically entity at the earnest, institute prompt treatment and hence ensure that a “spontaneous” rupture, doesn’t become a “faux pas” in the true sense of the word. BioMed Central 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4936092/ /pubmed/27388295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-016-0158-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Aggarwal, Gaurav
Adhikary, Samiran Das
Spontaneous ureteric rupture, a reality or a faux pas?
title Spontaneous ureteric rupture, a reality or a faux pas?
title_full Spontaneous ureteric rupture, a reality or a faux pas?
title_fullStr Spontaneous ureteric rupture, a reality or a faux pas?
title_full_unstemmed Spontaneous ureteric rupture, a reality or a faux pas?
title_short Spontaneous ureteric rupture, a reality or a faux pas?
title_sort spontaneous ureteric rupture, a reality or a faux pas?
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-016-0158-2
work_keys_str_mv AT aggarwalgaurav spontaneousuretericrupturearealityorafauxpas
AT adhikarysamirandas spontaneousuretericrupturearealityorafauxpas