Cargando…

Comparison of Multidetector CT and Gadobutrol-Enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Small, Solid Pancreatic Lesions

OBJECTIVE: To compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and MRI for lesion conspicuity, as well as the detection and characterization of small solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 193 patients with small SPLs (< 3 cm) and 52 patients with normal pancreas who underwent bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Tae Won, Lee, Jeong Min, Kim, Jung Hoon, Yu, Mi Hye, Han, Joon Koo, Choi, Byung Ihn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390542
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.509
_version_ 1782441521207836672
author Choi, Tae Won
Lee, Jeong Min
Kim, Jung Hoon
Yu, Mi Hye
Han, Joon Koo
Choi, Byung Ihn
author_facet Choi, Tae Won
Lee, Jeong Min
Kim, Jung Hoon
Yu, Mi Hye
Han, Joon Koo
Choi, Byung Ihn
author_sort Choi, Tae Won
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and MRI for lesion conspicuity, as well as the detection and characterization of small solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 193 patients with small SPLs (< 3 cm) and 52 patients with normal pancreas who underwent both multiphasic MDCT and gadobutrol-enhanced MRI were included in our study. Two radiologists blinded to the pathologic diagnoses independently reviewed those images, and determined the detection of "SPL per se" and "SPL in consideration of secondary features", the lesion conspicuity, the probability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and the most likely specific diagnosis. RESULTS: The sensitivity of MRI for "detection of SPL per se" was significantly higher than that of CT in both reviewers: 92.7% (179/193) and 97.9% (189/193), respectively, for reviewer 1 (p = 0.031) and 90.7% (175/193) and 99.5% (192/193), respectively, for reviewer 2 (p < 0.001). In addition, MRI provided better lesion conspicuity than MDCT for both reviewers (p < 0.001). However, CT and MRI did not show significant difference in sensitivity for "detection of SPL in consideration of secondary features", specificity for SPL detection, and differentiation of PDAC vs. non-PDAC (p > 0.05). The accuracies of CT and MRI for making a specific diagnosis were as follows: 85.7% (210/245) vs. 86.9% (213/245), respectively, for reviewer 1 (p = 0.736), and 91.8% (225/245) vs. 93.5% (229/245), respectively, for reviewer 2 (p = 0.454). CONCLUSION: MRI showed better lesion conspicuity than MDCT, but did not show significantly different diagnostic performance compared with MDCT for detecting and characterizing small SPLs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4936173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49361732016-07-07 Comparison of Multidetector CT and Gadobutrol-Enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Small, Solid Pancreatic Lesions Choi, Tae Won Lee, Jeong Min Kim, Jung Hoon Yu, Mi Hye Han, Joon Koo Choi, Byung Ihn Korean J Radiol Gastrointestinal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and MRI for lesion conspicuity, as well as the detection and characterization of small solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 193 patients with small SPLs (< 3 cm) and 52 patients with normal pancreas who underwent both multiphasic MDCT and gadobutrol-enhanced MRI were included in our study. Two radiologists blinded to the pathologic diagnoses independently reviewed those images, and determined the detection of "SPL per se" and "SPL in consideration of secondary features", the lesion conspicuity, the probability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and the most likely specific diagnosis. RESULTS: The sensitivity of MRI for "detection of SPL per se" was significantly higher than that of CT in both reviewers: 92.7% (179/193) and 97.9% (189/193), respectively, for reviewer 1 (p = 0.031) and 90.7% (175/193) and 99.5% (192/193), respectively, for reviewer 2 (p < 0.001). In addition, MRI provided better lesion conspicuity than MDCT for both reviewers (p < 0.001). However, CT and MRI did not show significant difference in sensitivity for "detection of SPL in consideration of secondary features", specificity for SPL detection, and differentiation of PDAC vs. non-PDAC (p > 0.05). The accuracies of CT and MRI for making a specific diagnosis were as follows: 85.7% (210/245) vs. 86.9% (213/245), respectively, for reviewer 1 (p = 0.736), and 91.8% (225/245) vs. 93.5% (229/245), respectively, for reviewer 2 (p = 0.454). CONCLUSION: MRI showed better lesion conspicuity than MDCT, but did not show significantly different diagnostic performance compared with MDCT for detecting and characterizing small SPLs. The Korean Society of Radiology 2016 2016-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4936173/ /pubmed/27390542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.509 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal Imaging
Choi, Tae Won
Lee, Jeong Min
Kim, Jung Hoon
Yu, Mi Hye
Han, Joon Koo
Choi, Byung Ihn
Comparison of Multidetector CT and Gadobutrol-Enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Small, Solid Pancreatic Lesions
title Comparison of Multidetector CT and Gadobutrol-Enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Small, Solid Pancreatic Lesions
title_full Comparison of Multidetector CT and Gadobutrol-Enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Small, Solid Pancreatic Lesions
title_fullStr Comparison of Multidetector CT and Gadobutrol-Enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Small, Solid Pancreatic Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Multidetector CT and Gadobutrol-Enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Small, Solid Pancreatic Lesions
title_short Comparison of Multidetector CT and Gadobutrol-Enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Small, Solid Pancreatic Lesions
title_sort comparison of multidetector ct and gadobutrol-enhanced mr imaging for evaluation of small, solid pancreatic lesions
topic Gastrointestinal Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390542
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.509
work_keys_str_mv AT choitaewon comparisonofmultidetectorctandgadobutrolenhancedmrimagingforevaluationofsmallsolidpancreaticlesions
AT leejeongmin comparisonofmultidetectorctandgadobutrolenhancedmrimagingforevaluationofsmallsolidpancreaticlesions
AT kimjunghoon comparisonofmultidetectorctandgadobutrolenhancedmrimagingforevaluationofsmallsolidpancreaticlesions
AT yumihye comparisonofmultidetectorctandgadobutrolenhancedmrimagingforevaluationofsmallsolidpancreaticlesions
AT hanjoonkoo comparisonofmultidetectorctandgadobutrolenhancedmrimagingforevaluationofsmallsolidpancreaticlesions
AT choibyungihn comparisonofmultidetectorctandgadobutrolenhancedmrimagingforevaluationofsmallsolidpancreaticlesions