Cargando…

Retraction pattern of delaminated rotator cuff tears: dual-layer rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND: There has been no report to date regarding retraction patterns of delaminated rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and tearing patterns of delamination and repair integrity after the dual-layer repair of delaminated cuff tears. METHODS/DESIGN: A con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cha, Sang-Won, Lee, Choon-Key, Sugaya, Hiroyuki, Kim, Taegyun, Lee, Su-Chan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27384069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0407-9
_version_ 1782441523882754048
author Cha, Sang-Won
Lee, Choon-Key
Sugaya, Hiroyuki
Kim, Taegyun
Lee, Su-Chan
author_facet Cha, Sang-Won
Lee, Choon-Key
Sugaya, Hiroyuki
Kim, Taegyun
Lee, Su-Chan
author_sort Cha, Sang-Won
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been no report to date regarding retraction patterns of delaminated rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and tearing patterns of delamination and repair integrity after the dual-layer repair of delaminated cuff tears. METHODS/DESIGN: A consecutive series of 64 patients with posterosuperior rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from August 2011 to September 2012. Among the patients, 53 who received either dual-layer double-row (DLDR) repair or dual-layer suture bridge (DLSB) repair and 11 who received a single-layer repair were evaluated. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 26.5 months. The retraction direction of the deep and superficial layers was analyzed, and the integrity of the repaired constructs was determined in 37 patients through magnetic resonance imaging at a mean of 12.1 months after surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of delamination was 82.8 %. Posteromedial retraction of the deep and superficial layers was observed in 98.1 and 88.5 % of cases, respectively. The Constant score and UCLA score increased preoperatively to postoperatively, showing no significant differences between the dual-layer repair group and single-layer repair group. Retear was found in two (7.6 %) patients in the dual-layer repair group and three (27.2 %) patients in the single-layer repair group (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Differential rotator cuff repair strategies are needed to address rotator cuff tears, since recent studies have changed our concept of rotator cuff tears. We have focused on three areas: incidence, retraction patterns, and clinical outcomes. The incidence of delamination was extremely high. Both the superficial layer and deep layer were mainly retracted posteromedially. The retraction of the deep layer and superficial layer may be affected by the infraspinatus. Dual-layer rotator cuff repair based on the retraction pattern of delamination is recommended for improvement of repair integrity and of clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4936190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49361902016-07-07 Retraction pattern of delaminated rotator cuff tears: dual-layer rotator cuff repair Cha, Sang-Won Lee, Choon-Key Sugaya, Hiroyuki Kim, Taegyun Lee, Su-Chan J Orthop Surg Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There has been no report to date regarding retraction patterns of delaminated rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and tearing patterns of delamination and repair integrity after the dual-layer repair of delaminated cuff tears. METHODS/DESIGN: A consecutive series of 64 patients with posterosuperior rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from August 2011 to September 2012. Among the patients, 53 who received either dual-layer double-row (DLDR) repair or dual-layer suture bridge (DLSB) repair and 11 who received a single-layer repair were evaluated. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 26.5 months. The retraction direction of the deep and superficial layers was analyzed, and the integrity of the repaired constructs was determined in 37 patients through magnetic resonance imaging at a mean of 12.1 months after surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of delamination was 82.8 %. Posteromedial retraction of the deep and superficial layers was observed in 98.1 and 88.5 % of cases, respectively. The Constant score and UCLA score increased preoperatively to postoperatively, showing no significant differences between the dual-layer repair group and single-layer repair group. Retear was found in two (7.6 %) patients in the dual-layer repair group and three (27.2 %) patients in the single-layer repair group (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Differential rotator cuff repair strategies are needed to address rotator cuff tears, since recent studies have changed our concept of rotator cuff tears. We have focused on three areas: incidence, retraction patterns, and clinical outcomes. The incidence of delamination was extremely high. Both the superficial layer and deep layer were mainly retracted posteromedially. The retraction of the deep layer and superficial layer may be affected by the infraspinatus. Dual-layer rotator cuff repair based on the retraction pattern of delamination is recommended for improvement of repair integrity and of clinical outcomes. BioMed Central 2016-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4936190/ /pubmed/27384069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0407-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cha, Sang-Won
Lee, Choon-Key
Sugaya, Hiroyuki
Kim, Taegyun
Lee, Su-Chan
Retraction pattern of delaminated rotator cuff tears: dual-layer rotator cuff repair
title Retraction pattern of delaminated rotator cuff tears: dual-layer rotator cuff repair
title_full Retraction pattern of delaminated rotator cuff tears: dual-layer rotator cuff repair
title_fullStr Retraction pattern of delaminated rotator cuff tears: dual-layer rotator cuff repair
title_full_unstemmed Retraction pattern of delaminated rotator cuff tears: dual-layer rotator cuff repair
title_short Retraction pattern of delaminated rotator cuff tears: dual-layer rotator cuff repair
title_sort retraction pattern of delaminated rotator cuff tears: dual-layer rotator cuff repair
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27384069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0407-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chasangwon retractionpatternofdelaminatedrotatorcufftearsduallayerrotatorcuffrepair
AT leechoonkey retractionpatternofdelaminatedrotatorcufftearsduallayerrotatorcuffrepair
AT sugayahiroyuki retractionpatternofdelaminatedrotatorcufftearsduallayerrotatorcuffrepair
AT kimtaegyun retractionpatternofdelaminatedrotatorcufftearsduallayerrotatorcuffrepair
AT leesuchan retractionpatternofdelaminatedrotatorcufftearsduallayerrotatorcuffrepair