Cargando…
Can “realist” randomised controlled trials be genuinely realist?
In this paper, we respond to a paper by Jamal and colleagues published in Trials in October 2015 and take an opportunity to continue the much-needed debate about what applied scientific realism is. The paper by Jamal et al. is useful because it exposes the challenges of combining a realist evaluatio...
Autores principales: | Van Belle, Sara, Wong, Geoff, Westhorp, Gill, Pearson, Mark, Emmel, Nick, Manzano, Ana, Marchal, Bruno |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1407-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations
por: Wong, Geoff, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
por: Wong, Geoff, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Protocol—the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation
por: Greenhalgh, Trisha, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES)
por: Greenhalgh, Trisha, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The possibility of critical realist randomised controlled trials
por: Porter, Sam, et al.
Publicado: (2017)