Cargando…

Long-term survival of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, many researchers focused on to robot-assisted surgery. However, on long-term outcomes for patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whether the robotic procedure is superior to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy is unclear. None...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Yang, Hao-Xian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27389329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0117-z
_version_ 1782441543703986176
author Yang, Hao-Xian
author_facet Yang, Hao-Xian
author_sort Yang, Hao-Xian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the past decade, many researchers focused on to robot-assisted surgery. However, on long-term outcomes for patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whether the robotic procedure is superior to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy is unclear. Nonetheless, in the article titled “Long-term survival based on the surgical approach to lobectomy for clinical stage I non–small cell lung cancer: comparison of robotic, video assisted thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy lobectomy” by Yang et al. that was recently published in Annals of Surgery, the authors provided convincing evidence that the robotic procedure results in similar long-term survival as compared with VATS and thoracotomy. Minimally invasive procedures typically result in shorter lengths of hospital stay, and the robotic procedure in particular results in superior lymph node assessment. MAIN BODY: Our propensity score-matched study generated high-quality data. Based on our findings, we see promise in expanding patient access to robotic lung resections. In this study, propensity score matching minimized the bias involved between groups. Nevertheless, due to its retrospective nature, bias may still exist. Currently, the concept of rapid rehabilitation is widely accepted, and it is very difficult to set up a randomized controlled trial to compare robotic, VATS, and thoracotomy procedures for the treatment of NSCLC. Therefore, to overcome this limitation and to minimize bias, the best approach is to use a registry and prospectively collected, propensity score-matched data. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic lung resections result in similar long-term survival as compared with VATS and thoracotomy. Robot-assisted and VATS procedures are associated with short lengths of hospital stay, and the robotic procedure in particular results in superior lymph node assessment. Considering the alarming increase in the incidence of lung cancer in China, a nationwide database of prospectively collected data available for clinical research would be especially important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4936295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49362952016-07-08 Long-term survival of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study Yang, Hao-Xian Chin J Cancer Research Highlight BACKGROUND: In the past decade, many researchers focused on to robot-assisted surgery. However, on long-term outcomes for patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whether the robotic procedure is superior to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy is unclear. Nonetheless, in the article titled “Long-term survival based on the surgical approach to lobectomy for clinical stage I non–small cell lung cancer: comparison of robotic, video assisted thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy lobectomy” by Yang et al. that was recently published in Annals of Surgery, the authors provided convincing evidence that the robotic procedure results in similar long-term survival as compared with VATS and thoracotomy. Minimally invasive procedures typically result in shorter lengths of hospital stay, and the robotic procedure in particular results in superior lymph node assessment. MAIN BODY: Our propensity score-matched study generated high-quality data. Based on our findings, we see promise in expanding patient access to robotic lung resections. In this study, propensity score matching minimized the bias involved between groups. Nevertheless, due to its retrospective nature, bias may still exist. Currently, the concept of rapid rehabilitation is widely accepted, and it is very difficult to set up a randomized controlled trial to compare robotic, VATS, and thoracotomy procedures for the treatment of NSCLC. Therefore, to overcome this limitation and to minimize bias, the best approach is to use a registry and prospectively collected, propensity score-matched data. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic lung resections result in similar long-term survival as compared with VATS and thoracotomy. Robot-assisted and VATS procedures are associated with short lengths of hospital stay, and the robotic procedure in particular results in superior lymph node assessment. Considering the alarming increase in the incidence of lung cancer in China, a nationwide database of prospectively collected data available for clinical research would be especially important. BioMed Central 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4936295/ /pubmed/27389329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0117-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Highlight
Yang, Hao-Xian
Long-term survival of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title Long-term survival of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title_full Long-term survival of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title_fullStr Long-term survival of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title_full_unstemmed Long-term survival of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title_short Long-term survival of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study
title_sort long-term survival of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study
topic Research Highlight
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27389329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0117-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghaoxian longtermsurvivalofearlystagenonsmallcelllungcancerpatientswhounderwentroboticprocedureapropensityscorematchedstudy