Cargando…

Cognitive effort and pupil dilation in controlled and automatic processes

The Five Digits Test (FDT) is a Stroop paradigm test that aims to evaluate executive functions. It is composed of four parts, two of which are related to automatic and two of which are related to controlled processes. It is known that pupillary diameter increases as the task’s cognitive demand incre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Querino, Emanuel, dos Santos, Lafaiete, Ginani, Giuliano, Nicolau, Eduardo, Miranda, Débora, Romano-Silva, Marco, Malloy-Diniz, Leandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter Open 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2015-0017
_version_ 1782441581418119168
author Querino, Emanuel
dos Santos, Lafaiete
Ginani, Giuliano
Nicolau, Eduardo
Miranda, Débora
Romano-Silva, Marco
Malloy-Diniz, Leandro
author_facet Querino, Emanuel
dos Santos, Lafaiete
Ginani, Giuliano
Nicolau, Eduardo
Miranda, Débora
Romano-Silva, Marco
Malloy-Diniz, Leandro
author_sort Querino, Emanuel
collection PubMed
description The Five Digits Test (FDT) is a Stroop paradigm test that aims to evaluate executive functions. It is composed of four parts, two of which are related to automatic and two of which are related to controlled processes. It is known that pupillary diameter increases as the task’s cognitive demand increases. In the present study, we evaluated whether the pupillary diameter could distinguish cognitive effort between automated and controlled cognitive processing during the FDT as the task progressed. As a control task, we used a simple reading paradigm with a similar visual aspect as the FDT. We then divided each of the four parts into two blocks in order to evaluate the differences between the first and second half of the task. Results indicated that, compared to a control task, the FDT required higher cognitive effort for each consecutive part. Moreover, the first half of every part of the FDT induced dilation more than the second. The differences in pupil dilation during the first half of the four FDT parts were statistically significant between the parts 2 and 4 (p=0.023), and between the parts 3 and 4 (p=0.006). These results provide further evidence that cognitive effort and pupil diameter can distinguish controlled from automatic processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4936625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher De Gruyter Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49366252017-01-25 Cognitive effort and pupil dilation in controlled and automatic processes Querino, Emanuel dos Santos, Lafaiete Ginani, Giuliano Nicolau, Eduardo Miranda, Débora Romano-Silva, Marco Malloy-Diniz, Leandro Transl Neurosci Research Article The Five Digits Test (FDT) is a Stroop paradigm test that aims to evaluate executive functions. It is composed of four parts, two of which are related to automatic and two of which are related to controlled processes. It is known that pupillary diameter increases as the task’s cognitive demand increases. In the present study, we evaluated whether the pupillary diameter could distinguish cognitive effort between automated and controlled cognitive processing during the FDT as the task progressed. As a control task, we used a simple reading paradigm with a similar visual aspect as the FDT. We then divided each of the four parts into two blocks in order to evaluate the differences between the first and second half of the task. Results indicated that, compared to a control task, the FDT required higher cognitive effort for each consecutive part. Moreover, the first half of every part of the FDT induced dilation more than the second. The differences in pupil dilation during the first half of the four FDT parts were statistically significant between the parts 2 and 4 (p=0.023), and between the parts 3 and 4 (p=0.006). These results provide further evidence that cognitive effort and pupil diameter can distinguish controlled from automatic processes. De Gruyter Open 2015-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4936625/ /pubmed/28123801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2015-0017 Text en © 2015 Emanuel Querino, et al. licensee De Gruyter Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Querino, Emanuel
dos Santos, Lafaiete
Ginani, Giuliano
Nicolau, Eduardo
Miranda, Débora
Romano-Silva, Marco
Malloy-Diniz, Leandro
Cognitive effort and pupil dilation in controlled and automatic processes
title Cognitive effort and pupil dilation in controlled and automatic processes
title_full Cognitive effort and pupil dilation in controlled and automatic processes
title_fullStr Cognitive effort and pupil dilation in controlled and automatic processes
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive effort and pupil dilation in controlled and automatic processes
title_short Cognitive effort and pupil dilation in controlled and automatic processes
title_sort cognitive effort and pupil dilation in controlled and automatic processes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2015-0017
work_keys_str_mv AT querinoemanuel cognitiveeffortandpupildilationincontrolledandautomaticprocesses
AT dossantoslafaiete cognitiveeffortandpupildilationincontrolledandautomaticprocesses
AT ginanigiuliano cognitiveeffortandpupildilationincontrolledandautomaticprocesses
AT nicolaueduardo cognitiveeffortandpupildilationincontrolledandautomaticprocesses
AT mirandadebora cognitiveeffortandpupildilationincontrolledandautomaticprocesses
AT romanosilvamarco cognitiveeffortandpupildilationincontrolledandautomaticprocesses
AT malloydinizleandro cognitiveeffortandpupildilationincontrolledandautomaticprocesses