Cargando…
Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients
BACKGROUND: To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with cisplatinum/paclitaxel versus cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received nonsurgical treatment. METHODS: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445460 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S105441 |
_version_ | 1782441616032661504 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Guofang Wang, Zhehai Wang, Yuan Zhang, Qingqing Tang, Ning Guo, Jun Liu, Liyan Han, Xiao |
author_facet | Hu, Guofang Wang, Zhehai Wang, Yuan Zhang, Qingqing Tang, Ning Guo, Jun Liu, Liyan Han, Xiao |
author_sort | Hu, Guofang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with cisplatinum/paclitaxel versus cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received nonsurgical treatment. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 202 patients with locally advanced ESCC treated at Shandong Cancer Hospital between January 2009 and December 2013. All the patients initially received dCRT, including platinum and paclitaxel or 5-fluorouracil, with concurrent 1.8 or 2 Gy/fraction radiation (total dose, 54–60 Gy). The patient population was divided into two treatment groups: 105 patients who received the cisplatinum/paclitaxel regimen were allocated to group A, and 97 patients who received the cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil regimen were allocated to group B. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by various clinical variables, including prior treatment characteristics, major toxicities (mainly in grade 3 and 4 hematological), and response to dCRT. We used the receiver operating curve analysis to determine the optimal cutoff value of clinical stage and radiation dose. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival comparison and Cox regression for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Median PFS and OS in group A were significantly better compared with group B (median PFS, 15.9 versus 13.0 months, P=0.016 and median OS, 33.9 versus 23.1 months, P=0.014, respectively). The 1- and 2-year survival rates of the two groups were 82.9% versus 76.3%, and 61.9% versus 47.6%, respectively. The complete response and response rate were 17.1% versus 7.2% (P=0.032) and 52.4% versus 30.9% (P=0.042) in group A and B, respectively. Meanwhile, group B was associated with a significantly lower rate of grade 3/4 overall toxicity than group A (P=0.039). CONCLUSION: Our data showed that patients with locally advanced ESCC in group A had longer PFS and OS compared with group B. Cisplatinum/paclitaxel can be considered a good candidate chemotherapy regimen for patients with locally advanced ESCC who are being treated with nonsurgical therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4936807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49368072016-07-21 Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients Hu, Guofang Wang, Zhehai Wang, Yuan Zhang, Qingqing Tang, Ning Guo, Jun Liu, Liyan Han, Xiao Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with cisplatinum/paclitaxel versus cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received nonsurgical treatment. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 202 patients with locally advanced ESCC treated at Shandong Cancer Hospital between January 2009 and December 2013. All the patients initially received dCRT, including platinum and paclitaxel or 5-fluorouracil, with concurrent 1.8 or 2 Gy/fraction radiation (total dose, 54–60 Gy). The patient population was divided into two treatment groups: 105 patients who received the cisplatinum/paclitaxel regimen were allocated to group A, and 97 patients who received the cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil regimen were allocated to group B. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by various clinical variables, including prior treatment characteristics, major toxicities (mainly in grade 3 and 4 hematological), and response to dCRT. We used the receiver operating curve analysis to determine the optimal cutoff value of clinical stage and radiation dose. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival comparison and Cox regression for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Median PFS and OS in group A were significantly better compared with group B (median PFS, 15.9 versus 13.0 months, P=0.016 and median OS, 33.9 versus 23.1 months, P=0.014, respectively). The 1- and 2-year survival rates of the two groups were 82.9% versus 76.3%, and 61.9% versus 47.6%, respectively. The complete response and response rate were 17.1% versus 7.2% (P=0.032) and 52.4% versus 30.9% (P=0.042) in group A and B, respectively. Meanwhile, group B was associated with a significantly lower rate of grade 3/4 overall toxicity than group A (P=0.039). CONCLUSION: Our data showed that patients with locally advanced ESCC in group A had longer PFS and OS compared with group B. Cisplatinum/paclitaxel can be considered a good candidate chemotherapy regimen for patients with locally advanced ESCC who are being treated with nonsurgical therapy. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4936807/ /pubmed/27445460 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S105441 Text en © 2016 Hu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hu, Guofang Wang, Zhehai Wang, Yuan Zhang, Qingqing Tang, Ning Guo, Jun Liu, Liyan Han, Xiao Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title | Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title_full | Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title_fullStr | Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title_short | Comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title_sort | comparison of cisplatinum/paclitaxel with cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for nonsurgical locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445460 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S105441 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huguofang comparisonofcisplatinumpaclitaxelwithcisplatinum5fluorouracilasfirstlinetherapyfornonsurgicallocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT wangzhehai comparisonofcisplatinumpaclitaxelwithcisplatinum5fluorouracilasfirstlinetherapyfornonsurgicallocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT wangyuan comparisonofcisplatinumpaclitaxelwithcisplatinum5fluorouracilasfirstlinetherapyfornonsurgicallocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT zhangqingqing comparisonofcisplatinumpaclitaxelwithcisplatinum5fluorouracilasfirstlinetherapyfornonsurgicallocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT tangning comparisonofcisplatinumpaclitaxelwithcisplatinum5fluorouracilasfirstlinetherapyfornonsurgicallocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT guojun comparisonofcisplatinumpaclitaxelwithcisplatinum5fluorouracilasfirstlinetherapyfornonsurgicallocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT liuliyan comparisonofcisplatinumpaclitaxelwithcisplatinum5fluorouracilasfirstlinetherapyfornonsurgicallocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT hanxiao comparisonofcisplatinumpaclitaxelwithcisplatinum5fluorouracilasfirstlinetherapyfornonsurgicallocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatients |