Cargando…

Physical models have gender‐specific effects on student understanding of protein structure–function relationships

Understanding how basic structural units influence function is identified as a foundational/core concept for undergraduate biological and biochemical literacy. It is essential for students to understand this concept at all size scales, but it is often more difficult for students to understand struct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forbes‐Lorman, Robin M., Harris, Michelle A., Chang, Wesley S., Dent, Erik W., Nordheim, Erik V., Franzen, Margaret A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26923186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20956
_version_ 1782441621970747392
author Forbes‐Lorman, Robin M.
Harris, Michelle A.
Chang, Wesley S.
Dent, Erik W.
Nordheim, Erik V.
Franzen, Margaret A.
author_facet Forbes‐Lorman, Robin M.
Harris, Michelle A.
Chang, Wesley S.
Dent, Erik W.
Nordheim, Erik V.
Franzen, Margaret A.
author_sort Forbes‐Lorman, Robin M.
collection PubMed
description Understanding how basic structural units influence function is identified as a foundational/core concept for undergraduate biological and biochemical literacy. It is essential for students to understand this concept at all size scales, but it is often more difficult for students to understand structure–function relationships at the molecular level, which they cannot as effectively visualize. Students need to develop accurate, 3‐dimensional mental models of biomolecules to understand how biomolecular structure affects cellular functions at the molecular level, yet most traditional curricular tools such as textbooks include only 2‐dimensional representations. We used a controlled, backward design approach to investigate how hand‐held physical molecular model use affected students' ability to logically predict structure–function relationships. Brief (one class period) physical model use increased quiz score for females, whereas there was no significant increase in score for males using physical models. Females also self‐reported higher learning gains in their understanding of context‐specific protein function. Gender differences in spatial visualization may explain the gender‐specific benefits of physical model use observed. © 2016 The Authors Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 44(4):326–335, 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4936926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49369262016-07-07 Physical models have gender‐specific effects on student understanding of protein structure–function relationships Forbes‐Lorman, Robin M. Harris, Michelle A. Chang, Wesley S. Dent, Erik W. Nordheim, Erik V. Franzen, Margaret A. Biochem Mol Biol Educ Articles Understanding how basic structural units influence function is identified as a foundational/core concept for undergraduate biological and biochemical literacy. It is essential for students to understand this concept at all size scales, but it is often more difficult for students to understand structure–function relationships at the molecular level, which they cannot as effectively visualize. Students need to develop accurate, 3‐dimensional mental models of biomolecules to understand how biomolecular structure affects cellular functions at the molecular level, yet most traditional curricular tools such as textbooks include only 2‐dimensional representations. We used a controlled, backward design approach to investigate how hand‐held physical molecular model use affected students' ability to logically predict structure–function relationships. Brief (one class period) physical model use increased quiz score for females, whereas there was no significant increase in score for males using physical models. Females also self‐reported higher learning gains in their understanding of context‐specific protein function. Gender differences in spatial visualization may explain the gender‐specific benefits of physical model use observed. © 2016 The Authors Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 44(4):326–335, 2016. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4936926/ /pubmed/26923186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20956 Text en © 2016 The Authors Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Articles
Forbes‐Lorman, Robin M.
Harris, Michelle A.
Chang, Wesley S.
Dent, Erik W.
Nordheim, Erik V.
Franzen, Margaret A.
Physical models have gender‐specific effects on student understanding of protein structure–function relationships
title Physical models have gender‐specific effects on student understanding of protein structure–function relationships
title_full Physical models have gender‐specific effects on student understanding of protein structure–function relationships
title_fullStr Physical models have gender‐specific effects on student understanding of protein structure–function relationships
title_full_unstemmed Physical models have gender‐specific effects on student understanding of protein structure–function relationships
title_short Physical models have gender‐specific effects on student understanding of protein structure–function relationships
title_sort physical models have gender‐specific effects on student understanding of protein structure–function relationships
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26923186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20956
work_keys_str_mv AT forbeslormanrobinm physicalmodelshavegenderspecificeffectsonstudentunderstandingofproteinstructurefunctionrelationships
AT harrismichellea physicalmodelshavegenderspecificeffectsonstudentunderstandingofproteinstructurefunctionrelationships
AT changwesleys physicalmodelshavegenderspecificeffectsonstudentunderstandingofproteinstructurefunctionrelationships
AT denterikw physicalmodelshavegenderspecificeffectsonstudentunderstandingofproteinstructurefunctionrelationships
AT nordheimerikv physicalmodelshavegenderspecificeffectsonstudentunderstandingofproteinstructurefunctionrelationships
AT franzenmargareta physicalmodelshavegenderspecificeffectsonstudentunderstandingofproteinstructurefunctionrelationships