Cargando…

Comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin

OBJECTIVES: Saxagliptin and sitagliptin are two commonly used dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Little is known about their comparative effectiveness in the real world, particularly their impact on cost and resources use. The objective of this study was to analyze charges and resource use a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaidya, Varun, Adhikari, Keyuri, Sheehan, Jack, Kalsekar, Iftekhar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-016-0104-8
_version_ 1782441624232525824
author Vaidya, Varun
Adhikari, Keyuri
Sheehan, Jack
Kalsekar, Iftekhar
author_facet Vaidya, Varun
Adhikari, Keyuri
Sheehan, Jack
Kalsekar, Iftekhar
author_sort Vaidya, Varun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Saxagliptin and sitagliptin are two commonly used dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Little is known about their comparative effectiveness in the real world, particularly their impact on cost and resources use. The objective of this study was to analyze charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin to understand the impact of these DPP-4 inhibitor treatment options in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, new-user study approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Toledo. Data were collected from a US insurance claims dataset (OptumInsight) for patients newly initiating treatment with saxagliptin or sitagliptin between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2011. ICD-9 code 250 was used to identify patients with T2D. Overall and diabetes-related medical and pharmacy charges were observed. Inpatient hospitalizations were also compared. Propensity score matching was used to balance the cohorts of patients prescribed saxagliptin and sitagliptin. Appropriate univariate statistical tests were applied to the propensity-matched sample to examine differences in resource utilization outcomes. Statistical significance was evaluated at P < 0.05. RESULT: After the propensity score matching, each cohort included 7711 patients. Saxagliptin treatment was associated with lower overall charges ($13,292 vs $14,032; P = 0.0023) and overall medical charges ($9,540 vs $10,296; P = 0.0024) during the 6-month follow-up period compared with sitagliptin treatment. No significant differences were observed in the overall pharmacy charges ($3,751 vs $3,753; P = 0.6937) and the diabetes-related charges ($5,141 vs $5,232; P = 0.2957). All-cause and diabetes-related inpatient hospitalization rates were significantly lower with saxagliptin treatment (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0019, respectively). All-caused inpatient charges were also significantly lower with saxagliptin ($2,917.26 vs $3445.89; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compared with patients initiating sitagliptin treatment, patients initiating saxagliptin treatment reported lower overall and medical charges and lower overall and diabetes-related hospitalization rates. These findings may aid payers in managing patients with T2D.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4936976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49369762016-07-08 Comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin Vaidya, Varun Adhikari, Keyuri Sheehan, Jack Kalsekar, Iftekhar Health Econ Rev Research OBJECTIVES: Saxagliptin and sitagliptin are two commonly used dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Little is known about their comparative effectiveness in the real world, particularly their impact on cost and resources use. The objective of this study was to analyze charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin to understand the impact of these DPP-4 inhibitor treatment options in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, new-user study approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Toledo. Data were collected from a US insurance claims dataset (OptumInsight) for patients newly initiating treatment with saxagliptin or sitagliptin between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2011. ICD-9 code 250 was used to identify patients with T2D. Overall and diabetes-related medical and pharmacy charges were observed. Inpatient hospitalizations were also compared. Propensity score matching was used to balance the cohorts of patients prescribed saxagliptin and sitagliptin. Appropriate univariate statistical tests were applied to the propensity-matched sample to examine differences in resource utilization outcomes. Statistical significance was evaluated at P < 0.05. RESULT: After the propensity score matching, each cohort included 7711 patients. Saxagliptin treatment was associated with lower overall charges ($13,292 vs $14,032; P = 0.0023) and overall medical charges ($9,540 vs $10,296; P = 0.0024) during the 6-month follow-up period compared with sitagliptin treatment. No significant differences were observed in the overall pharmacy charges ($3,751 vs $3,753; P = 0.6937) and the diabetes-related charges ($5,141 vs $5,232; P = 0.2957). All-cause and diabetes-related inpatient hospitalization rates were significantly lower with saxagliptin treatment (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0019, respectively). All-caused inpatient charges were also significantly lower with saxagliptin ($2,917.26 vs $3445.89; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compared with patients initiating sitagliptin treatment, patients initiating saxagliptin treatment reported lower overall and medical charges and lower overall and diabetes-related hospitalization rates. These findings may aid payers in managing patients with T2D. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4936976/ /pubmed/27388897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-016-0104-8 Text en © Vaidya et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Vaidya, Varun
Adhikari, Keyuri
Sheehan, Jack
Kalsekar, Iftekhar
Comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin
title Comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin
title_full Comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin
title_fullStr Comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin
title_short Comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin
title_sort comparison of charges and resource use associated with saxagliptin and sitagliptin
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-016-0104-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vaidyavarun comparisonofchargesandresourceuseassociatedwithsaxagliptinandsitagliptin
AT adhikarikeyuri comparisonofchargesandresourceuseassociatedwithsaxagliptinandsitagliptin
AT sheehanjack comparisonofchargesandresourceuseassociatedwithsaxagliptinandsitagliptin
AT kalsekariftekhar comparisonofchargesandresourceuseassociatedwithsaxagliptinandsitagliptin