Cargando…

A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the newest bipolar vessel sealing system (BVSS; LigaSure™ Small Jaw) to that of conventional technique in axillary dissection. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with breast cancer were randomized to a conventional dissection surgical techni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seki, Tomoko, Hayashida, Tetsu, Takahashi, Maiko, Jinno, Hiromitsu, Kitagawa, Yuko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2710-7
_version_ 1782441629894836224
author Seki, Tomoko
Hayashida, Tetsu
Takahashi, Maiko
Jinno, Hiromitsu
Kitagawa, Yuko
author_facet Seki, Tomoko
Hayashida, Tetsu
Takahashi, Maiko
Jinno, Hiromitsu
Kitagawa, Yuko
author_sort Seki, Tomoko
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the newest bipolar vessel sealing system (BVSS; LigaSure™ Small Jaw) to that of conventional technique in axillary dissection. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with breast cancer were randomized to a conventional dissection surgical technique (CONV group; n = 30) by scalpel and monopolar cautery or that using a vessel sealing system (BVSS group; n = 31). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between both groups in the mean number of days until drain removal (6.4 ± 2.9 vs. 8.2 ± 3.8 days; P value = 0.033), and the mean total volume of drainage fluid (365.3 ± 242.2 vs. 625.1 ± 446.6 mL; P value = 0.009). The incidence of seroma was similar in both groups (43.3 vs. 37.9 %; P value = 0.673). There was no statistically significant difference in axillary dissection operating time (66 vs. 70 min; P value = 0.371), or the mean volume of blood loss (18.2 ± 31.1 vs. 20.6 ± 26.3 mL; P value = 0.663). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that BVSS is a more effective device when compared to the conventional techniques in axillary dissection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4937003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49370032016-07-08 A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer Seki, Tomoko Hayashida, Tetsu Takahashi, Maiko Jinno, Hiromitsu Kitagawa, Yuko Springerplus Research OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the newest bipolar vessel sealing system (BVSS; LigaSure™ Small Jaw) to that of conventional technique in axillary dissection. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with breast cancer were randomized to a conventional dissection surgical technique (CONV group; n = 30) by scalpel and monopolar cautery or that using a vessel sealing system (BVSS group; n = 31). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between both groups in the mean number of days until drain removal (6.4 ± 2.9 vs. 8.2 ± 3.8 days; P value = 0.033), and the mean total volume of drainage fluid (365.3 ± 242.2 vs. 625.1 ± 446.6 mL; P value = 0.009). The incidence of seroma was similar in both groups (43.3 vs. 37.9 %; P value = 0.673). There was no statistically significant difference in axillary dissection operating time (66 vs. 70 min; P value = 0.371), or the mean volume of blood loss (18.2 ± 31.1 vs. 20.6 ± 26.3 mL; P value = 0.663). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that BVSS is a more effective device when compared to the conventional techniques in axillary dissection. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4937003/ /pubmed/27398279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2710-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Seki, Tomoko
Hayashida, Tetsu
Takahashi, Maiko
Jinno, Hiromitsu
Kitagawa, Yuko
A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer
title A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer
title_full A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer
title_fullStr A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer
title_short A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer
title_sort randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2710-7
work_keys_str_mv AT sekitomoko arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer
AT hayashidatetsu arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer
AT takahashimaiko arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer
AT jinnohiromitsu arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer
AT kitagawayuko arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer
AT sekitomoko randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer
AT hayashidatetsu randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer
AT takahashimaiko randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer
AT jinnohiromitsu randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer
AT kitagawayuko randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer