Cargando…
A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the newest bipolar vessel sealing system (BVSS; LigaSure™ Small Jaw) to that of conventional technique in axillary dissection. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with breast cancer were randomized to a conventional dissection surgical techni...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2710-7 |
_version_ | 1782441629894836224 |
---|---|
author | Seki, Tomoko Hayashida, Tetsu Takahashi, Maiko Jinno, Hiromitsu Kitagawa, Yuko |
author_facet | Seki, Tomoko Hayashida, Tetsu Takahashi, Maiko Jinno, Hiromitsu Kitagawa, Yuko |
author_sort | Seki, Tomoko |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the newest bipolar vessel sealing system (BVSS; LigaSure™ Small Jaw) to that of conventional technique in axillary dissection. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with breast cancer were randomized to a conventional dissection surgical technique (CONV group; n = 30) by scalpel and monopolar cautery or that using a vessel sealing system (BVSS group; n = 31). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between both groups in the mean number of days until drain removal (6.4 ± 2.9 vs. 8.2 ± 3.8 days; P value = 0.033), and the mean total volume of drainage fluid (365.3 ± 242.2 vs. 625.1 ± 446.6 mL; P value = 0.009). The incidence of seroma was similar in both groups (43.3 vs. 37.9 %; P value = 0.673). There was no statistically significant difference in axillary dissection operating time (66 vs. 70 min; P value = 0.371), or the mean volume of blood loss (18.2 ± 31.1 vs. 20.6 ± 26.3 mL; P value = 0.663). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that BVSS is a more effective device when compared to the conventional techniques in axillary dissection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4937003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49370032016-07-08 A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer Seki, Tomoko Hayashida, Tetsu Takahashi, Maiko Jinno, Hiromitsu Kitagawa, Yuko Springerplus Research OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the newest bipolar vessel sealing system (BVSS; LigaSure™ Small Jaw) to that of conventional technique in axillary dissection. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with breast cancer were randomized to a conventional dissection surgical technique (CONV group; n = 30) by scalpel and monopolar cautery or that using a vessel sealing system (BVSS group; n = 31). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between both groups in the mean number of days until drain removal (6.4 ± 2.9 vs. 8.2 ± 3.8 days; P value = 0.033), and the mean total volume of drainage fluid (365.3 ± 242.2 vs. 625.1 ± 446.6 mL; P value = 0.009). The incidence of seroma was similar in both groups (43.3 vs. 37.9 %; P value = 0.673). There was no statistically significant difference in axillary dissection operating time (66 vs. 70 min; P value = 0.371), or the mean volume of blood loss (18.2 ± 31.1 vs. 20.6 ± 26.3 mL; P value = 0.663). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that BVSS is a more effective device when compared to the conventional techniques in axillary dissection. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4937003/ /pubmed/27398279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2710-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Seki, Tomoko Hayashida, Tetsu Takahashi, Maiko Jinno, Hiromitsu Kitagawa, Yuko A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer |
title | A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer |
title_full | A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer |
title_fullStr | A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer |
title_short | A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer |
title_sort | randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2710-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sekitomoko arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer AT hayashidatetsu arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer AT takahashimaiko arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer AT jinnohiromitsu arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer AT kitagawayuko arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer AT sekitomoko randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer AT hayashidatetsu randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer AT takahashimaiko randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer AT jinnohiromitsu randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer AT kitagawayuko randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingavesselsealingsystemwiththeconventionaltechniqueinaxillarylymphnodedissectionforprimarybreastcancer |