Cargando…
Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study
BACKGROUND: Third‐generation P2Y(12) antagonists (prasugrel and ticagrelor) are recommended in guidelines on ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Mechanisms translating their more potent antiplatelet activity into improved clinical outcomes versus the second‐generation P2Y(12) antagonist clop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27247336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003403 |
_version_ | 1782441681229971456 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Jamal N. Greenwood, John P. Nazir, Sheraz A. Lai, Florence Y. Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. McCann, Gerry P. |
author_facet | Khan, Jamal N. Greenwood, John P. Nazir, Sheraz A. Lai, Florence Y. Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. McCann, Gerry P. |
author_sort | Khan, Jamal N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Third‐generation P2Y(12) antagonists (prasugrel and ticagrelor) are recommended in guidelines on ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Mechanisms translating their more potent antiplatelet activity into improved clinical outcomes versus the second‐generation P2Y(12) antagonist clopidogrel are unclear. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the Complete Versus Lesion‐Only PRImary PCI Trial‐CMR (CvLPRIT‐CMR) substudy was to assess whether prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with reduced infarct size compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: CvLPRIT‐CMR was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open‐label, blinded end point trial in 203 ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with either infarct‐related artery–only or complete revascularization. P2Y(12) inhibitors were administered according to local guidelines. The primary end point of infarct size on cardiovascular magnetic resonance was not significantly different between the randomized groups. P2Y(12) antagonist administration was not randomized. Patients receiving clopidogrel (n=70) compared with those treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor (n=133) were older (67.8±12 versus 61.5±10 years, P<0.001), more frequently had hypertension (49% versus 29%, P=0.007), and tended to have longer symptom‐to‐revascularization time (234 versus 177 minutes, P=0.05). Infarct size (median 16.1% [quartiles 1–3, 10.5–27.7%] versus 12.1% [quartiles 1–3, 4.8–20.7%] of left ventricular mass, P=0.013) and microvascular obstruction incidence (65.7% versus 48.9%, P=0.022) were significantly greater in patients receiving clopidogrel. Infarct size remained significantly different after adjustment for important covariates using both generalized linear models (P=0.048) and propensity score matching (P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of CvLPRIT‐CMR, third‐generation P2Y(12) antagonists were associated with smaller infarct size and lower microvascular obstruction incidence versus the second‐generation P2Y(12) antagonist clopidogrel for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN70913605. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4937278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49372782016-07-18 Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study Khan, Jamal N. Greenwood, John P. Nazir, Sheraz A. Lai, Florence Y. Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. McCann, Gerry P. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Third‐generation P2Y(12) antagonists (prasugrel and ticagrelor) are recommended in guidelines on ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Mechanisms translating their more potent antiplatelet activity into improved clinical outcomes versus the second‐generation P2Y(12) antagonist clopidogrel are unclear. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the Complete Versus Lesion‐Only PRImary PCI Trial‐CMR (CvLPRIT‐CMR) substudy was to assess whether prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with reduced infarct size compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: CvLPRIT‐CMR was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open‐label, blinded end point trial in 203 ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with either infarct‐related artery–only or complete revascularization. P2Y(12) inhibitors were administered according to local guidelines. The primary end point of infarct size on cardiovascular magnetic resonance was not significantly different between the randomized groups. P2Y(12) antagonist administration was not randomized. Patients receiving clopidogrel (n=70) compared with those treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor (n=133) were older (67.8±12 versus 61.5±10 years, P<0.001), more frequently had hypertension (49% versus 29%, P=0.007), and tended to have longer symptom‐to‐revascularization time (234 versus 177 minutes, P=0.05). Infarct size (median 16.1% [quartiles 1–3, 10.5–27.7%] versus 12.1% [quartiles 1–3, 4.8–20.7%] of left ventricular mass, P=0.013) and microvascular obstruction incidence (65.7% versus 48.9%, P=0.022) were significantly greater in patients receiving clopidogrel. Infarct size remained significantly different after adjustment for important covariates using both generalized linear models (P=0.048) and propensity score matching (P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of CvLPRIT‐CMR, third‐generation P2Y(12) antagonists were associated with smaller infarct size and lower microvascular obstruction incidence versus the second‐generation P2Y(12) antagonist clopidogrel for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN70913605. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4937278/ /pubmed/27247336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003403 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Khan, Jamal N. Greenwood, John P. Nazir, Sheraz A. Lai, Florence Y. Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. McCann, Gerry P. Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study |
title | Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study |
title_full | Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study |
title_fullStr | Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study |
title_short | Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study |
title_sort | infarct size following treatment with second‐ versus third‐generation p2y(12) antagonists in patients with multivessel coronary disease at st‐segment elevation myocardial infarction in the cvlprit study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27247336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanjamaln infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT greenwoodjohnp infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT nazirsheraza infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT laiflorencey infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT dalbymiles infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT curzennick infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT hetheringtonsimon infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT kellydamianj infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT blackmandaniel infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT peeblescharles infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT wongjoyce infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT flathermarcus infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT swantonhoward infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT gershlickanthonyh infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy AT mccanngerryp infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy |