Cargando…

Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study

BACKGROUND: Third‐generation P2Y(12) antagonists (prasugrel and ticagrelor) are recommended in guidelines on ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Mechanisms translating their more potent antiplatelet activity into improved clinical outcomes versus the second‐generation P2Y(12) antagonist clop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Jamal N., Greenwood, John P., Nazir, Sheraz A., Lai, Florence Y., Dalby, Miles, Curzen, Nick, Hetherington, Simon, Kelly, Damian J., Blackman, Daniel, Peebles, Charles, Wong, Joyce, Flather, Marcus, Swanton, Howard, Gershlick, Anthony H., McCann, Gerry P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27247336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003403
_version_ 1782441681229971456
author Khan, Jamal N.
Greenwood, John P.
Nazir, Sheraz A.
Lai, Florence Y.
Dalby, Miles
Curzen, Nick
Hetherington, Simon
Kelly, Damian J.
Blackman, Daniel
Peebles, Charles
Wong, Joyce
Flather, Marcus
Swanton, Howard
Gershlick, Anthony H.
McCann, Gerry P.
author_facet Khan, Jamal N.
Greenwood, John P.
Nazir, Sheraz A.
Lai, Florence Y.
Dalby, Miles
Curzen, Nick
Hetherington, Simon
Kelly, Damian J.
Blackman, Daniel
Peebles, Charles
Wong, Joyce
Flather, Marcus
Swanton, Howard
Gershlick, Anthony H.
McCann, Gerry P.
author_sort Khan, Jamal N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Third‐generation P2Y(12) antagonists (prasugrel and ticagrelor) are recommended in guidelines on ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Mechanisms translating their more potent antiplatelet activity into improved clinical outcomes versus the second‐generation P2Y(12) antagonist clopidogrel are unclear. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the Complete Versus Lesion‐Only PRImary PCI Trial‐CMR (CvLPRIT‐CMR) substudy was to assess whether prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with reduced infarct size compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: CvLPRIT‐CMR was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open‐label, blinded end point trial in 203 ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with either infarct‐related artery–only or complete revascularization. P2Y(12) inhibitors were administered according to local guidelines. The primary end point of infarct size on cardiovascular magnetic resonance was not significantly different between the randomized groups. P2Y(12) antagonist administration was not randomized. Patients receiving clopidogrel (n=70) compared with those treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor (n=133) were older (67.8±12 versus 61.5±10 years, P<0.001), more frequently had hypertension (49% versus 29%, P=0.007), and tended to have longer symptom‐to‐revascularization time (234 versus 177 minutes, P=0.05). Infarct size (median 16.1% [quartiles 1–3, 10.5–27.7%] versus 12.1% [quartiles 1–3, 4.8–20.7%] of left ventricular mass, P=0.013) and microvascular obstruction incidence (65.7% versus 48.9%, P=0.022) were significantly greater in patients receiving clopidogrel. Infarct size remained significantly different after adjustment for important covariates using both generalized linear models (P=0.048) and propensity score matching (P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of CvLPRIT‐CMR, third‐generation P2Y(12) antagonists were associated with smaller infarct size and lower microvascular obstruction incidence versus the second‐generation P2Y(12) antagonist clopidogrel for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN70913605.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4937278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49372782016-07-18 Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study Khan, Jamal N. Greenwood, John P. Nazir, Sheraz A. Lai, Florence Y. Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. McCann, Gerry P. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Third‐generation P2Y(12) antagonists (prasugrel and ticagrelor) are recommended in guidelines on ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Mechanisms translating their more potent antiplatelet activity into improved clinical outcomes versus the second‐generation P2Y(12) antagonist clopidogrel are unclear. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the Complete Versus Lesion‐Only PRImary PCI Trial‐CMR (CvLPRIT‐CMR) substudy was to assess whether prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with reduced infarct size compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: CvLPRIT‐CMR was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open‐label, blinded end point trial in 203 ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with either infarct‐related artery–only or complete revascularization. P2Y(12) inhibitors were administered according to local guidelines. The primary end point of infarct size on cardiovascular magnetic resonance was not significantly different between the randomized groups. P2Y(12) antagonist administration was not randomized. Patients receiving clopidogrel (n=70) compared with those treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor (n=133) were older (67.8±12 versus 61.5±10 years, P<0.001), more frequently had hypertension (49% versus 29%, P=0.007), and tended to have longer symptom‐to‐revascularization time (234 versus 177 minutes, P=0.05). Infarct size (median 16.1% [quartiles 1–3, 10.5–27.7%] versus 12.1% [quartiles 1–3, 4.8–20.7%] of left ventricular mass, P=0.013) and microvascular obstruction incidence (65.7% versus 48.9%, P=0.022) were significantly greater in patients receiving clopidogrel. Infarct size remained significantly different after adjustment for important covariates using both generalized linear models (P=0.048) and propensity score matching (P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of CvLPRIT‐CMR, third‐generation P2Y(12) antagonists were associated with smaller infarct size and lower microvascular obstruction incidence versus the second‐generation P2Y(12) antagonist clopidogrel for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN70913605. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4937278/ /pubmed/27247336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003403 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Khan, Jamal N.
Greenwood, John P.
Nazir, Sheraz A.
Lai, Florence Y.
Dalby, Miles
Curzen, Nick
Hetherington, Simon
Kelly, Damian J.
Blackman, Daniel
Peebles, Charles
Wong, Joyce
Flather, Marcus
Swanton, Howard
Gershlick, Anthony H.
McCann, Gerry P.
Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study
title Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study
title_full Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study
title_fullStr Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study
title_full_unstemmed Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study
title_short Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second‐ Versus Third‐Generation P2Y(12) Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study
title_sort infarct size following treatment with second‐ versus third‐generation p2y(12) antagonists in patients with multivessel coronary disease at st‐segment elevation myocardial infarction in the cvlprit study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27247336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003403
work_keys_str_mv AT khanjamaln infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT greenwoodjohnp infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT nazirsheraza infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT laiflorencey infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT dalbymiles infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT curzennick infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT hetheringtonsimon infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT kellydamianj infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT blackmandaniel infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT peeblescharles infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT wongjoyce infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT flathermarcus infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT swantonhoward infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT gershlickanthonyh infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy
AT mccanngerryp infarctsizefollowingtreatmentwithsecondversusthirdgenerationp2y12antagonistsinpatientswithmultivesselcoronarydiseaseatstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninthecvlpritstudy