Cargando…

Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of radial access (RA) in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been predominantly established in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with limited exploration of this issue in the early postfibrinolytic patient. The purpose of this study was to com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shavadia, Jay, Welsh, Robert, Gershlick, Anthony, Zheng, Yinggan, Huber, Kurt, Halvorsen, Sigrun, Steg, Phillipe G., Van de Werf, Frans, Armstrong, Paul W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003559
_version_ 1782441682384453632
author Shavadia, Jay
Welsh, Robert
Gershlick, Anthony
Zheng, Yinggan
Huber, Kurt
Halvorsen, Sigrun
Steg, Phillipe G.
Van de Werf, Frans
Armstrong, Paul W.
author_facet Shavadia, Jay
Welsh, Robert
Gershlick, Anthony
Zheng, Yinggan
Huber, Kurt
Halvorsen, Sigrun
Steg, Phillipe G.
Van de Werf, Frans
Armstrong, Paul W.
author_sort Shavadia, Jay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of radial access (RA) in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been predominantly established in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with limited exploration of this issue in the early postfibrinolytic patient. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of RA versus femoral (FA) access in STEMI undergoing either a pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy or pPCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM), we evaluated the relationship between arterial access site and primary outcome (30‐day composite of death, shock, congestive heart failure, or reinfarction) and major bleeding according to the treatment strategy received. A total of 1820 STEMI patients were included: 895 PI (49.2%; rescue PCI [n=379; 42.3%], scheduled PCI [n=516; 57.7%]) and 925 pPCI (50.8%). Irrespective of treatment strategy, there was comparable utilization of either access site (FA: PI 53.4% and pPCI 57.6%). FA STEMI patients were younger, had lower presenting systolic blood pressure, lesser Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk, and more ∑ST‐elevation at baseline. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 8.9% RA versus 15.7% FA patients (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, this benefit on the primary composite outcome favoring RA persisted (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.78; P<0.001) and was evident in both pPCI (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43–0.92) and PI cohorts (adjusted OR, 0.57 95% CI, 0.37–0.86; P interaction=0.730). There was no difference in nonintracranial major bleeding with either access group (RA vs FA, 5.2% vs 6.0%; P=0.489). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the application of a PI or pPCI strategy, RA was associated with improved clinical outcomes, supporting current STEMI evidence in favor of RA in PCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00623623.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4937283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49372832016-07-18 Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study Shavadia, Jay Welsh, Robert Gershlick, Anthony Zheng, Yinggan Huber, Kurt Halvorsen, Sigrun Steg, Phillipe G. Van de Werf, Frans Armstrong, Paul W. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of radial access (RA) in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been predominantly established in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with limited exploration of this issue in the early postfibrinolytic patient. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of RA versus femoral (FA) access in STEMI undergoing either a pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy or pPCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM), we evaluated the relationship between arterial access site and primary outcome (30‐day composite of death, shock, congestive heart failure, or reinfarction) and major bleeding according to the treatment strategy received. A total of 1820 STEMI patients were included: 895 PI (49.2%; rescue PCI [n=379; 42.3%], scheduled PCI [n=516; 57.7%]) and 925 pPCI (50.8%). Irrespective of treatment strategy, there was comparable utilization of either access site (FA: PI 53.4% and pPCI 57.6%). FA STEMI patients were younger, had lower presenting systolic blood pressure, lesser Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk, and more ∑ST‐elevation at baseline. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 8.9% RA versus 15.7% FA patients (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, this benefit on the primary composite outcome favoring RA persisted (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.78; P<0.001) and was evident in both pPCI (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43–0.92) and PI cohorts (adjusted OR, 0.57 95% CI, 0.37–0.86; P interaction=0.730). There was no difference in nonintracranial major bleeding with either access group (RA vs FA, 5.2% vs 6.0%; P=0.489). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the application of a PI or pPCI strategy, RA was associated with improved clinical outcomes, supporting current STEMI evidence in favor of RA in PCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00623623. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4937283/ /pubmed/28525886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003559 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shavadia, Jay
Welsh, Robert
Gershlick, Anthony
Zheng, Yinggan
Huber, Kurt
Halvorsen, Sigrun
Steg, Phillipe G.
Van de Werf, Frans
Armstrong, Paul W.
Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study
title Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study
title_full Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study
title_fullStr Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study
title_full_unstemmed Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study
title_short Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study
title_sort relationship between arterial access and outcomes in st‐elevation myocardial infarction with a pharmacoinvasive versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention strategy: insights from the strategic reperfusion early after myocardial infarction (stream) study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003559
work_keys_str_mv AT shavadiajay relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy
AT welshrobert relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy
AT gershlickanthony relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy
AT zhengyinggan relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy
AT huberkurt relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy
AT halvorsensigrun relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy
AT stegphillipeg relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy
AT vandewerffrans relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy
AT armstrongpaulw relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy
AT relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy