Cargando…
Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of radial access (RA) in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been predominantly established in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with limited exploration of this issue in the early postfibrinolytic patient. The purpose of this study was to com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003559 |
_version_ | 1782441682384453632 |
---|---|
author | Shavadia, Jay Welsh, Robert Gershlick, Anthony Zheng, Yinggan Huber, Kurt Halvorsen, Sigrun Steg, Phillipe G. Van de Werf, Frans Armstrong, Paul W. |
author_facet | Shavadia, Jay Welsh, Robert Gershlick, Anthony Zheng, Yinggan Huber, Kurt Halvorsen, Sigrun Steg, Phillipe G. Van de Werf, Frans Armstrong, Paul W. |
author_sort | Shavadia, Jay |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of radial access (RA) in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been predominantly established in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with limited exploration of this issue in the early postfibrinolytic patient. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of RA versus femoral (FA) access in STEMI undergoing either a pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy or pPCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM), we evaluated the relationship between arterial access site and primary outcome (30‐day composite of death, shock, congestive heart failure, or reinfarction) and major bleeding according to the treatment strategy received. A total of 1820 STEMI patients were included: 895 PI (49.2%; rescue PCI [n=379; 42.3%], scheduled PCI [n=516; 57.7%]) and 925 pPCI (50.8%). Irrespective of treatment strategy, there was comparable utilization of either access site (FA: PI 53.4% and pPCI 57.6%). FA STEMI patients were younger, had lower presenting systolic blood pressure, lesser Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk, and more ∑ST‐elevation at baseline. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 8.9% RA versus 15.7% FA patients (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, this benefit on the primary composite outcome favoring RA persisted (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.78; P<0.001) and was evident in both pPCI (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43–0.92) and PI cohorts (adjusted OR, 0.57 95% CI, 0.37–0.86; P interaction=0.730). There was no difference in nonintracranial major bleeding with either access group (RA vs FA, 5.2% vs 6.0%; P=0.489). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the application of a PI or pPCI strategy, RA was associated with improved clinical outcomes, supporting current STEMI evidence in favor of RA in PCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00623623. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4937283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49372832016-07-18 Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study Shavadia, Jay Welsh, Robert Gershlick, Anthony Zheng, Yinggan Huber, Kurt Halvorsen, Sigrun Steg, Phillipe G. Van de Werf, Frans Armstrong, Paul W. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of radial access (RA) in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been predominantly established in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with limited exploration of this issue in the early postfibrinolytic patient. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of RA versus femoral (FA) access in STEMI undergoing either a pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy or pPCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM), we evaluated the relationship between arterial access site and primary outcome (30‐day composite of death, shock, congestive heart failure, or reinfarction) and major bleeding according to the treatment strategy received. A total of 1820 STEMI patients were included: 895 PI (49.2%; rescue PCI [n=379; 42.3%], scheduled PCI [n=516; 57.7%]) and 925 pPCI (50.8%). Irrespective of treatment strategy, there was comparable utilization of either access site (FA: PI 53.4% and pPCI 57.6%). FA STEMI patients were younger, had lower presenting systolic blood pressure, lesser Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk, and more ∑ST‐elevation at baseline. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 8.9% RA versus 15.7% FA patients (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, this benefit on the primary composite outcome favoring RA persisted (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.78; P<0.001) and was evident in both pPCI (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43–0.92) and PI cohorts (adjusted OR, 0.57 95% CI, 0.37–0.86; P interaction=0.730). There was no difference in nonintracranial major bleeding with either access group (RA vs FA, 5.2% vs 6.0%; P=0.489). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the application of a PI or pPCI strategy, RA was associated with improved clinical outcomes, supporting current STEMI evidence in favor of RA in PCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00623623. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4937283/ /pubmed/28525886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003559 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Shavadia, Jay Welsh, Robert Gershlick, Anthony Zheng, Yinggan Huber, Kurt Halvorsen, Sigrun Steg, Phillipe G. Van de Werf, Frans Armstrong, Paul W. Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study |
title | Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study |
title_full | Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study |
title_fullStr | Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study |
title_short | Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study |
title_sort | relationship between arterial access and outcomes in st‐elevation myocardial infarction with a pharmacoinvasive versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention strategy: insights from the strategic reperfusion early after myocardial infarction (stream) study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shavadiajay relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy AT welshrobert relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy AT gershlickanthony relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy AT zhengyinggan relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy AT huberkurt relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy AT halvorsensigrun relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy AT stegphillipeg relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy AT vandewerffrans relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy AT armstrongpaulw relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy AT relationshipbetweenarterialaccessandoutcomesinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithapharmacoinvasiveversusprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategyinsightsfromthestrategicreperfusionearlyaftermyocardialinfarctionstreamstudy |