Cargando…

Left ventricular pacing vector selection by novel echo-particle imaging velocimetry analysis for optimization of quadripolar cardiac resynchronization device: a case report

BACKGROUND: The availability of pacing configurations offered by quadripolar left ventricular leads could improve patients’ response to cardiac resynchronization therapy; however, the selection of an optimal setting remains a challenge. Echo-particle imaging velocimetry has shown that regional anoma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Martiniello, Alfonso/A. Roberto/R., Pedrizzetti, Gianni/G., Bianchi, Valter/V., Tonti, Giovanni/G., D’Onofrio, Antonio/A., Caso, Pio/P.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2016
Materias:	Case Report
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0965-9

Ejemplares similares

Combined flow-based imaging assessment of optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing vector: a case report
por: Martiniello, A. R., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization
por: Leyva, Francisco, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Intentional anodal capture of a left ventricular quadripolar lead enhances resynchronization equally with multipoint pacing
por: Morishima, Itsuro, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Vector Selection of a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Pacing Lead Affects Acute Hemodynamic Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial
por: Asbach, Stefan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP)
por: Forleo, Giovanni B., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison among left ventricular bipolar, quadripolar and active fixation leads
por: Ziacchi, M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Repetitive optimizing left ventricular pacing configurations with quadripolar leads improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A single-center randomized clinical trial
por: Gu, Min, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Intraventricular flow patterns during right ventricular apical pacing
por: Bianco, Francesco, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Performance and clinical comparison between left ventricular quadripolar and bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Observational research
por: Ziacchi, M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Short-Term Availability of Viable Left Ventricular Pacing Sites with Quartet™ Quadripolar Leads
por: Gu, Min, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

An active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy with reduced postoperative complication rates
por: Robertson, Calum, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with multipoint pacing via quadripolar lead versus traditional biventricular pacing: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies on hemodynamic, clinical, and prognostic parameters
por: Massacesi, Cristiano, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Anodal Capture for Multisite Pacing with a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead: A Feasibility Study
por: Bodin, Alexandre, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Novel lead anchor technique using an active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Inamura, Yukihiro, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Shetty, Anoop K., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Impact of anatomical reverse remodelling in the design of optimal quadripolar pacing leads: A computational study
por: Rodero, Cristobal, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Therapy in a Large, Multicenter UK Registry
por: Behar, Jonathan M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Performance of an active fixation bipolar left ventricular lead vs passive fixation quadripolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy, a randomized trial
por: Keilegavlen, Havard, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Right ventricular only pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Hermes-Laufer, Julia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Left ventricular high frame rate echo-particle image velocimetry: clinical application and comparison with conventional imaging
por: Strachinaru, Mihai, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular septal pacing: An alternative to biventricular pacing?
por: Gu, Min, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Electrical remodelling and response following cardiac resynchronization therapy: A novel analysis of intracardiac electrogram using a quadripolar lead
por: Toner, Liam, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative Analysis of Right Ventricle Fluid Dynamics
por: Collia, Dario, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Hospitalization rates and associated cost analysis of cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable defibrillator and quadripolar vs. bipolar left ventricular leads: a comparative effectiveness study
por: Forleo, Giovanni B., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead: An Effective Alternative for Phrenic Nerve Stimulation
por: Nair, Krishnakumar
Publicado: (2013)

Lead related complications in quadripolar versus bipolar left ventricular leads
por: Rijal, Shasank, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cerebral microcirculation mapped by echo particle tracking velocimetry quantifies the intracranial pressure and detects ischemia
por: Zhang, Zeng, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
por: Cano, Óscar, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Six months clinical outcome comparison between quadripolar and bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A prospective, non-randomized, single-centre observational study
por: Raj, Ajay, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Therapy for cardiac resynchronization: When left ventricular–only “fusion” pacing is not enough
por: Varma, Niraj
Publicado: (2020)

Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with chronic right ventricular pacing
por: Rath, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Quadripolar left ventricle only single lead pacing in a patient with a tricuspid mechanical valve: A less invasive approach
por: Grazina, André, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cancer-Related Cardiotoxicity
por: Melillo, Enrico, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cardiac resynchronization in pacing-associated cardiomyopathy: Is it time to upgrade?
por: Hutchinson, Mathew D.
Publicado: (2021)

Alternative pacing strategies for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Hua, Juan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Wijesuriya, Nadeev, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Epicardial versus endocardial pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Marciniak, M, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Feasibility of physiological pacing rate in cardiac resynchronization therapy
por: Spaggiari, Caio V., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Improvement of Right Ventricular Hemodynamics with Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
por: HYDE, EOIN R., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_dojm9n9ejo1daqfg6j4t13q9iu