Cargando…

The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures

BACKGROUND: Evaluating different approaches to identifying frail home care clients at heightened risk for adverse health outcomes is an important but understudied area. Our objectives were to determine the prevalence and correlates of frailty (as operationally defined by three measures) in a home ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campitelli, Michael A., Bronskill, Susan E., Hogan, David B., Diong, Christina, Amuah, Joseph E., Gill, Sudeep, Seitz, Dallas, Thavorn, Kednapa, Wodchis, Walter P., Maxwell, Colleen J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0309-z
_version_ 1782441736063156224
author Campitelli, Michael A.
Bronskill, Susan E.
Hogan, David B.
Diong, Christina
Amuah, Joseph E.
Gill, Sudeep
Seitz, Dallas
Thavorn, Kednapa
Wodchis, Walter P.
Maxwell, Colleen J.
author_facet Campitelli, Michael A.
Bronskill, Susan E.
Hogan, David B.
Diong, Christina
Amuah, Joseph E.
Gill, Sudeep
Seitz, Dallas
Thavorn, Kednapa
Wodchis, Walter P.
Maxwell, Colleen J.
author_sort Campitelli, Michael A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluating different approaches to identifying frail home care clients at heightened risk for adverse health outcomes is an important but understudied area. Our objectives were to determine the prevalence and correlates of frailty (as operationally defined by three measures) in a home care cohort, the agreement between these measures, and their predictive validity for several outcomes assessed over one year. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with linked population-based administrative and clinical (Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI]) data for all long-stay home care clients (aged 66+) assessed between April 2010–2013 in Ontario, Canada (n = 234,552). We examined two versions of a frailty index (FI), a full and modified FI, and the CHESS scale, compared their baseline characteristics and their predictive accuracy (by calculating the area under the ROC curve [AUC]) for death, long-term care (LTC) admission, and hospitalization endpoints in models adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity. RESULTS: Frailty prevalence varied by measure (19.5, 24.4 and 44.1 %, for full FI, modified FI and CHESS, respectively) and was similar among female and male clients. All three measures were associated with a significantly increased risk of death, LTC admission and hospitalization endpoints in adjusted analyses but their addition to base models resulted in modest improvement for most AUC estimates. There were significant differences between measures in predictive accuracy, with the full FI demonstrating a higher AUC for LTC admission and CHESS a higher AUC for hospitalization - although none of the measures performed well for the hospitalization endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The different approaches to detecting vulnerability resulted in different estimates of frailty prevalence among home care clients in Ontario. Although all three measures were significant predictors of the health outcomes examined, the gains in predictive accuracy were often modest with the exception of the full FI in predicting LTC admission. Our findings provide some support for the clinical utility of a comprehensive FI measure and also illustrate that it is feasible to derive such a measure at the population level using routinely collected data. This may facilitate further research on frailty in this setting, including the development and evaluation of interventions for frailty. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0309-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4937594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49375942016-07-09 The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures Campitelli, Michael A. Bronskill, Susan E. Hogan, David B. Diong, Christina Amuah, Joseph E. Gill, Sudeep Seitz, Dallas Thavorn, Kednapa Wodchis, Walter P. Maxwell, Colleen J. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Evaluating different approaches to identifying frail home care clients at heightened risk for adverse health outcomes is an important but understudied area. Our objectives were to determine the prevalence and correlates of frailty (as operationally defined by three measures) in a home care cohort, the agreement between these measures, and their predictive validity for several outcomes assessed over one year. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with linked population-based administrative and clinical (Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI]) data for all long-stay home care clients (aged 66+) assessed between April 2010–2013 in Ontario, Canada (n = 234,552). We examined two versions of a frailty index (FI), a full and modified FI, and the CHESS scale, compared their baseline characteristics and their predictive accuracy (by calculating the area under the ROC curve [AUC]) for death, long-term care (LTC) admission, and hospitalization endpoints in models adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity. RESULTS: Frailty prevalence varied by measure (19.5, 24.4 and 44.1 %, for full FI, modified FI and CHESS, respectively) and was similar among female and male clients. All three measures were associated with a significantly increased risk of death, LTC admission and hospitalization endpoints in adjusted analyses but their addition to base models resulted in modest improvement for most AUC estimates. There were significant differences between measures in predictive accuracy, with the full FI demonstrating a higher AUC for LTC admission and CHESS a higher AUC for hospitalization - although none of the measures performed well for the hospitalization endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The different approaches to detecting vulnerability resulted in different estimates of frailty prevalence among home care clients in Ontario. Although all three measures were significant predictors of the health outcomes examined, the gains in predictive accuracy were often modest with the exception of the full FI in predicting LTC admission. Our findings provide some support for the clinical utility of a comprehensive FI measure and also illustrate that it is feasible to derive such a measure at the population level using routinely collected data. This may facilitate further research on frailty in this setting, including the development and evaluation of interventions for frailty. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0309-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4937594/ /pubmed/27388294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0309-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Campitelli, Michael A.
Bronskill, Susan E.
Hogan, David B.
Diong, Christina
Amuah, Joseph E.
Gill, Sudeep
Seitz, Dallas
Thavorn, Kednapa
Wodchis, Walter P.
Maxwell, Colleen J.
The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures
title The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures
title_full The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures
title_fullStr The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures
title_short The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures
title_sort prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0309-z
work_keys_str_mv AT campitellimichaela theprevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT bronskillsusane theprevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT hogandavidb theprevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT diongchristina theprevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT amuahjosephe theprevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT gillsudeep theprevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT seitzdallas theprevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT thavornkednapa theprevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT wodchiswalterp theprevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT maxwellcolleenj theprevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT campitellimichaela prevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT bronskillsusane prevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT hogandavidb prevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT diongchristina prevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT amuahjosephe prevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT gillsudeep prevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT seitzdallas prevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT thavornkednapa prevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT wodchiswalterp prevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures
AT maxwellcolleenj prevalenceandhealthconsequencesoffrailtyinapopulationbasedolderhomecarecohortacomparisonofdifferentmeasures