Cargando…

Comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other London women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses

BACKGROUND: Data from providers of private cancer care are not yet formally included in English cancer registration data. This study aimed to test the exchange of breast cancer data from one Hospital Corporation of America International (HCAI) hospital in London with the cancer registration system a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Elizabeth A., Coupland, Victoria H., Dixon, Steve, Mokbel, Kefah, Jack, Ruth H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27389391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2439-2
_version_ 1782441736292794368
author Davies, Elizabeth A.
Coupland, Victoria H.
Dixon, Steve
Mokbel, Kefah
Jack, Ruth H.
author_facet Davies, Elizabeth A.
Coupland, Victoria H.
Dixon, Steve
Mokbel, Kefah
Jack, Ruth H.
author_sort Davies, Elizabeth A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data from providers of private cancer care are not yet formally included in English cancer registration data. This study aimed to test the exchange of breast cancer data from one Hospital Corporation of America International (HCAI) hospital in London with the cancer registration system and assess the suitability of these data for comparative analyses of case mix and adjusted survival. METHODS: Data on 199 London women receiving ‘only HCAI care’, 278 women receiving ‘some HCAI care’ (HCAI and other services), and 31,234 other London women diagnosed between 2005 and 2011 could be identified and compared. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression was used to adjust for age, socioeconomic deprivation, year of diagnosis, stage of disease and recorded treatment. RESULTS: Women receiving ‘only HCAI care’ were younger, lived in areas of higher affluence (47.8 % vs 27.6 %) and appeared less likely to be recorded as having screen-detected (2.5 % vs 25.0 %) disease than other London women. Women receiving ‘some HCAI care’ were more similar to ‘HCAI only’ women. Although HCAI stage of disease data completeness improved during the study period, this was less complete overall than cancer registration data and limited the comparative survival analyses. An apparent survival advantage for ‘HCAI only’ women compared with other London women (hazard ratio 0.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.74) was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after adjustment (0.79, 95 % CI: 0.51-1.21). Women receiving ‘some HCAI care’ appeared to have higher survival (hazard ratio 0.24, 95 % CI 0.14-0.41) which was attenuated to 0.48 (95 % CI: 0.28-0.80) in the fully adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange of data between the private cancer sector and the English cancer registration service can identify patients who receive all or some private care. The better survival of women receiving only or some HCAI breast cancer care appears to be at least partly explained by demographic, disease, and treatment factors. However, larger studies using similarly quality assured datasets and more complete staging data from the private sector are needed to produce definitive comparative results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4937595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49375952016-07-09 Comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other London women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses Davies, Elizabeth A. Coupland, Victoria H. Dixon, Steve Mokbel, Kefah Jack, Ruth H. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Data from providers of private cancer care are not yet formally included in English cancer registration data. This study aimed to test the exchange of breast cancer data from one Hospital Corporation of America International (HCAI) hospital in London with the cancer registration system and assess the suitability of these data for comparative analyses of case mix and adjusted survival. METHODS: Data on 199 London women receiving ‘only HCAI care’, 278 women receiving ‘some HCAI care’ (HCAI and other services), and 31,234 other London women diagnosed between 2005 and 2011 could be identified and compared. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression was used to adjust for age, socioeconomic deprivation, year of diagnosis, stage of disease and recorded treatment. RESULTS: Women receiving ‘only HCAI care’ were younger, lived in areas of higher affluence (47.8 % vs 27.6 %) and appeared less likely to be recorded as having screen-detected (2.5 % vs 25.0 %) disease than other London women. Women receiving ‘some HCAI care’ were more similar to ‘HCAI only’ women. Although HCAI stage of disease data completeness improved during the study period, this was less complete overall than cancer registration data and limited the comparative survival analyses. An apparent survival advantage for ‘HCAI only’ women compared with other London women (hazard ratio 0.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.74) was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after adjustment (0.79, 95 % CI: 0.51-1.21). Women receiving ‘some HCAI care’ appeared to have higher survival (hazard ratio 0.24, 95 % CI 0.14-0.41) which was attenuated to 0.48 (95 % CI: 0.28-0.80) in the fully adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange of data between the private cancer sector and the English cancer registration service can identify patients who receive all or some private care. The better survival of women receiving only or some HCAI breast cancer care appears to be at least partly explained by demographic, disease, and treatment factors. However, larger studies using similarly quality assured datasets and more complete staging data from the private sector are needed to produce definitive comparative results. BioMed Central 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4937595/ /pubmed/27389391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2439-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Davies, Elizabeth A.
Coupland, Victoria H.
Dixon, Steve
Mokbel, Kefah
Jack, Ruth H.
Comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other London women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses
title Comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other London women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses
title_full Comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other London women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses
title_fullStr Comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other London women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other London women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses
title_short Comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other London women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses
title_sort comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other london women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27389391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2439-2
work_keys_str_mv AT davieselizabetha comparingthecasemixandsurvivalofwomenreceivingbreastcancercarefromoneprivateproviderwithotherlondonwomenwithbreastcancerpilotdataexchangeandanalyses
AT couplandvictoriah comparingthecasemixandsurvivalofwomenreceivingbreastcancercarefromoneprivateproviderwithotherlondonwomenwithbreastcancerpilotdataexchangeandanalyses
AT dixonsteve comparingthecasemixandsurvivalofwomenreceivingbreastcancercarefromoneprivateproviderwithotherlondonwomenwithbreastcancerpilotdataexchangeandanalyses
AT mokbelkefah comparingthecasemixandsurvivalofwomenreceivingbreastcancercarefromoneprivateproviderwithotherlondonwomenwithbreastcancerpilotdataexchangeandanalyses
AT jackruthh comparingthecasemixandsurvivalofwomenreceivingbreastcancercarefromoneprivateproviderwithotherlondonwomenwithbreastcancerpilotdataexchangeandanalyses