Cargando…

Mutagenicity and Pollutant Emission Factors of Solid-Fuel Cookstoves: Comparison with Other Combustion Sources

BACKGROUND: Emissions from solid fuels used for cooking cause ~4 million premature deaths per year. Advanced solid-fuel cookstoves are a potential solution, but they should be assessed by appropriate performance indicators, including biological effects. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated two categories of soli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mutlu, Esra, Warren, Sarah H., Ebersviller, Seth M., Kooter, Ingeborg M., Schmid, Judith E., Dye, Janice A., Linak, William P., Gilmour, M. Ian, Jetter, James J., Higuchi, Mark, DeMarini, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26895221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509852
_version_ 1782441780878245888
author Mutlu, Esra
Warren, Sarah H.
Ebersviller, Seth M.
Kooter, Ingeborg M.
Schmid, Judith E.
Dye, Janice A.
Linak, William P.
Gilmour, M. Ian
Jetter, James J.
Higuchi, Mark
DeMarini, David M.
author_facet Mutlu, Esra
Warren, Sarah H.
Ebersviller, Seth M.
Kooter, Ingeborg M.
Schmid, Judith E.
Dye, Janice A.
Linak, William P.
Gilmour, M. Ian
Jetter, James J.
Higuchi, Mark
DeMarini, David M.
author_sort Mutlu, Esra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emissions from solid fuels used for cooking cause ~4 million premature deaths per year. Advanced solid-fuel cookstoves are a potential solution, but they should be assessed by appropriate performance indicators, including biological effects. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated two categories of solid-fuel cookstoves for eight pollutant and four mutagenicity emission factors, correlated the mutagenicity emission factors, and compared them to those of other combustion emissions. METHODS: We burned red oak in a 3-stone fire (TSF), a natural-draft stove (NDS), and a forced-draft stove (FDS), and we combusted propane as a liquified petroleum gas control fuel. We determined emission factors based on useful energy (megajoules delivered, MJd) for carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides (NOx), black carbon, methane, total hydrocarbons, 32 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, PM2.5, levoglucosan (a wood-smoke marker), and mutagenicity in Salmonella. RESULTS: With the exception of NOx, the emission factors per MJd were highly correlated (r ≥ 0.97); the correlation for NOx with the other emission factors was 0.58–0.76. Excluding NOx, the NDS and FDS reduced the emission factors an average of 68 and 92%, respectively, relative to the TSF. Nevertheless, the mutagenicity emission factor based on fuel energy used (MJthermal) for the most efficient stove (FDS) was between those of a large diesel bus engine and a small diesel generator. CONCLUSIONS: Both mutagenicity and pollutant emission factors may be informative for characterizing cookstove performance. However, mutagenicity emission factors may be especially useful for characterizing potential health effects and should be evaluated in relation to health outcomes in future research. An FDS operated as intended by the manufacturer is safer than a TSF, but without adequate ventilation, it will still result in poor indoor air quality. CITATION: Mutlu E, Warren SH, Ebersviller SM, Kooter IM, Schmid JE, Dye JA, Linak WP, Gilmour MI, Jetter JJ, Higuchi M, DeMarini DM. 2016. Mutagenicity and pollutant emission factors of solid-fuel cookstoves: comparison with other combustion sources. Environ Health Perspect 124:974–982; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509852
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4937857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49378572016-07-13 Mutagenicity and Pollutant Emission Factors of Solid-Fuel Cookstoves: Comparison with Other Combustion Sources Mutlu, Esra Warren, Sarah H. Ebersviller, Seth M. Kooter, Ingeborg M. Schmid, Judith E. Dye, Janice A. Linak, William P. Gilmour, M. Ian Jetter, James J. Higuchi, Mark DeMarini, David M. Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: Emissions from solid fuels used for cooking cause ~4 million premature deaths per year. Advanced solid-fuel cookstoves are a potential solution, but they should be assessed by appropriate performance indicators, including biological effects. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated two categories of solid-fuel cookstoves for eight pollutant and four mutagenicity emission factors, correlated the mutagenicity emission factors, and compared them to those of other combustion emissions. METHODS: We burned red oak in a 3-stone fire (TSF), a natural-draft stove (NDS), and a forced-draft stove (FDS), and we combusted propane as a liquified petroleum gas control fuel. We determined emission factors based on useful energy (megajoules delivered, MJd) for carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides (NOx), black carbon, methane, total hydrocarbons, 32 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, PM2.5, levoglucosan (a wood-smoke marker), and mutagenicity in Salmonella. RESULTS: With the exception of NOx, the emission factors per MJd were highly correlated (r ≥ 0.97); the correlation for NOx with the other emission factors was 0.58–0.76. Excluding NOx, the NDS and FDS reduced the emission factors an average of 68 and 92%, respectively, relative to the TSF. Nevertheless, the mutagenicity emission factor based on fuel energy used (MJthermal) for the most efficient stove (FDS) was between those of a large diesel bus engine and a small diesel generator. CONCLUSIONS: Both mutagenicity and pollutant emission factors may be informative for characterizing cookstove performance. However, mutagenicity emission factors may be especially useful for characterizing potential health effects and should be evaluated in relation to health outcomes in future research. An FDS operated as intended by the manufacturer is safer than a TSF, but without adequate ventilation, it will still result in poor indoor air quality. CITATION: Mutlu E, Warren SH, Ebersviller SM, Kooter IM, Schmid JE, Dye JA, Linak WP, Gilmour MI, Jetter JJ, Higuchi M, DeMarini DM. 2016. Mutagenicity and pollutant emission factors of solid-fuel cookstoves: comparison with other combustion sources. Environ Health Perspect 124:974–982; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509852 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2016-02-19 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4937857/ /pubmed/26895221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509852 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Mutlu, Esra
Warren, Sarah H.
Ebersviller, Seth M.
Kooter, Ingeborg M.
Schmid, Judith E.
Dye, Janice A.
Linak, William P.
Gilmour, M. Ian
Jetter, James J.
Higuchi, Mark
DeMarini, David M.
Mutagenicity and Pollutant Emission Factors of Solid-Fuel Cookstoves: Comparison with Other Combustion Sources
title Mutagenicity and Pollutant Emission Factors of Solid-Fuel Cookstoves: Comparison with Other Combustion Sources
title_full Mutagenicity and Pollutant Emission Factors of Solid-Fuel Cookstoves: Comparison with Other Combustion Sources
title_fullStr Mutagenicity and Pollutant Emission Factors of Solid-Fuel Cookstoves: Comparison with Other Combustion Sources
title_full_unstemmed Mutagenicity and Pollutant Emission Factors of Solid-Fuel Cookstoves: Comparison with Other Combustion Sources
title_short Mutagenicity and Pollutant Emission Factors of Solid-Fuel Cookstoves: Comparison with Other Combustion Sources
title_sort mutagenicity and pollutant emission factors of solid-fuel cookstoves: comparison with other combustion sources
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26895221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509852
work_keys_str_mv AT mutluesra mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources
AT warrensarahh mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources
AT ebersvillersethm mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources
AT kooteringeborgm mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources
AT schmidjudithe mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources
AT dyejanicea mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources
AT linakwilliamp mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources
AT gilmourmian mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources
AT jetterjamesj mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources
AT higuchimark mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources
AT demarinidavidm mutagenicityandpollutantemissionfactorsofsolidfuelcookstovescomparisonwithothercombustionsources