Cargando…

Bacteraemia during Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: What Are the Risk Factors and Is It More Common than We Think?

The aim of this work was to investigate the microbial causes, incidence, duration, risk factors and clinical implications of bacteraemia occurring during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) surgery to better inform prophylaxis strategies. An ethically approved, prospective, cohort study o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohee, Amar Raj, Gascoyne-Binzi, Deborah, West, Robert, Bhattarai, Selina, Eardley, Ian, Sandoe, Jonathan A. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157864
_version_ 1782441814184165376
author Mohee, Amar Raj
Gascoyne-Binzi, Deborah
West, Robert
Bhattarai, Selina
Eardley, Ian
Sandoe, Jonathan A. T.
author_facet Mohee, Amar Raj
Gascoyne-Binzi, Deborah
West, Robert
Bhattarai, Selina
Eardley, Ian
Sandoe, Jonathan A. T.
author_sort Mohee, Amar Raj
collection PubMed
description The aim of this work was to investigate the microbial causes, incidence, duration, risk factors and clinical implications of bacteraemia occurring during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) surgery to better inform prophylaxis strategies. An ethically approved, prospective, cohort study of patients undergoing TURP was conducted. Clinical information and follow-up details were collected using standardized data collection sheets. Blood was obtained for culture at 6 different time points peri-procedure. Standard of care antibiotic prophylaxis was given prior to surgery. Bacteriuria was assessed in a pre-procedure urine sample. Histopathology from all prostate chips was assessed for inflammation and malignancy. 73 patients were consented and 276 blood samples obtained. No patients developed symptomatic bacteraemia during the procedure, 17 patients developed asymptomatic bacteraemia (23.2%). Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most common organisms cultured. 10 minutes after the start of the TURP, the odds ratio (OR) of developing bacteraemia was 5.38 (CI 0.97–29.87 p = 0.05), and 20 minutes after the start of the procedure, the OR was 6.46 (CI 1.12–37.24, p = 0.03), compared to before the procedure. We also found an association between the development of intra-operative bacteraemia and recent antibiotic use (OR 4.34, CI 1.14–16.62, p = 0.032), the presence of a urinary catheter (OR 4.92, CI 1.13–21.51, p = 0.034) and a malignant histology (OR 4.90, CI 1.30–18.46, p = 0.019). There was no statistical relationship between pre-operative urine culture results and blood culture results. This study shows that asymptomatic bacteraemia is commonly caused by TURP and occurs in spite of antibiotic prophylaxis. Our findings challenge the commonly held view that urine is the primary source of bacteraemia in TURP-associated sepsis and raise the possibility of occult prostatic infection as a cause of bacteraemia. More work will be needed to determine the significance of transient bacteraemia in relation to more serious complications like infective endocarditis and malignancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49381302016-07-22 Bacteraemia during Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: What Are the Risk Factors and Is It More Common than We Think? Mohee, Amar Raj Gascoyne-Binzi, Deborah West, Robert Bhattarai, Selina Eardley, Ian Sandoe, Jonathan A. T. PLoS One Research Article The aim of this work was to investigate the microbial causes, incidence, duration, risk factors and clinical implications of bacteraemia occurring during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) surgery to better inform prophylaxis strategies. An ethically approved, prospective, cohort study of patients undergoing TURP was conducted. Clinical information and follow-up details were collected using standardized data collection sheets. Blood was obtained for culture at 6 different time points peri-procedure. Standard of care antibiotic prophylaxis was given prior to surgery. Bacteriuria was assessed in a pre-procedure urine sample. Histopathology from all prostate chips was assessed for inflammation and malignancy. 73 patients were consented and 276 blood samples obtained. No patients developed symptomatic bacteraemia during the procedure, 17 patients developed asymptomatic bacteraemia (23.2%). Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most common organisms cultured. 10 minutes after the start of the TURP, the odds ratio (OR) of developing bacteraemia was 5.38 (CI 0.97–29.87 p = 0.05), and 20 minutes after the start of the procedure, the OR was 6.46 (CI 1.12–37.24, p = 0.03), compared to before the procedure. We also found an association between the development of intra-operative bacteraemia and recent antibiotic use (OR 4.34, CI 1.14–16.62, p = 0.032), the presence of a urinary catheter (OR 4.92, CI 1.13–21.51, p = 0.034) and a malignant histology (OR 4.90, CI 1.30–18.46, p = 0.019). There was no statistical relationship between pre-operative urine culture results and blood culture results. This study shows that asymptomatic bacteraemia is commonly caused by TURP and occurs in spite of antibiotic prophylaxis. Our findings challenge the commonly held view that urine is the primary source of bacteraemia in TURP-associated sepsis and raise the possibility of occult prostatic infection as a cause of bacteraemia. More work will be needed to determine the significance of transient bacteraemia in relation to more serious complications like infective endocarditis and malignancy. Public Library of Science 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938130/ /pubmed/27391962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157864 Text en © 2016 Mohee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mohee, Amar Raj
Gascoyne-Binzi, Deborah
West, Robert
Bhattarai, Selina
Eardley, Ian
Sandoe, Jonathan A. T.
Bacteraemia during Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: What Are the Risk Factors and Is It More Common than We Think?
title Bacteraemia during Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: What Are the Risk Factors and Is It More Common than We Think?
title_full Bacteraemia during Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: What Are the Risk Factors and Is It More Common than We Think?
title_fullStr Bacteraemia during Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: What Are the Risk Factors and Is It More Common than We Think?
title_full_unstemmed Bacteraemia during Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: What Are the Risk Factors and Is It More Common than We Think?
title_short Bacteraemia during Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: What Are the Risk Factors and Is It More Common than We Think?
title_sort bacteraemia during transurethral resection of the prostate: what are the risk factors and is it more common than we think?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157864
work_keys_str_mv AT moheeamarraj bacteraemiaduringtransurethralresectionoftheprostatewhataretheriskfactorsandisitmorecommonthanwethink
AT gascoynebinzideborah bacteraemiaduringtransurethralresectionoftheprostatewhataretheriskfactorsandisitmorecommonthanwethink
AT westrobert bacteraemiaduringtransurethralresectionoftheprostatewhataretheriskfactorsandisitmorecommonthanwethink
AT bhattaraiselina bacteraemiaduringtransurethralresectionoftheprostatewhataretheriskfactorsandisitmorecommonthanwethink
AT eardleyian bacteraemiaduringtransurethralresectionoftheprostatewhataretheriskfactorsandisitmorecommonthanwethink
AT sandoejonathanat bacteraemiaduringtransurethralresectionoftheprostatewhataretheriskfactorsandisitmorecommonthanwethink