Cargando…

Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor VIII for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND: No head-to-head trials comparing recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products currently exist. This was a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 with antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM) and turoctocog alfa for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pocoski, Jennifer, Li, Nanxin, Ayyagari, Rajeev, Church, Nikki, Maas Enriquez, Monika, Xiang, Quer, Kelkar, Sneha, Du, Ella X, Wu, Eric Q, Xie, Jipan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445511
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S104074
_version_ 1782441815751786496
author Pocoski, Jennifer
Li, Nanxin
Ayyagari, Rajeev
Church, Nikki
Maas Enriquez, Monika
Xiang, Quer
Kelkar, Sneha
Du, Ella X
Wu, Eric Q
Xie, Jipan
author_facet Pocoski, Jennifer
Li, Nanxin
Ayyagari, Rajeev
Church, Nikki
Maas Enriquez, Monika
Xiang, Quer
Kelkar, Sneha
Du, Ella X
Wu, Eric Q
Xie, Jipan
author_sort Pocoski, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No head-to-head trials comparing recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products currently exist. This was a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 with antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM) and turoctocog alfa for the prophylaxis of severe hemophilia A. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify trials of rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa. Comparisons were conducted using BAY 81-8973 individual patient data (IPD) from LEOPOLD trials and published data from rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa trials. Differences in outcome reporting were reconciled using transformation of BAY 81-8973 IPD. Patients in pooled LEOPOLD trials were weighted to match baseline characteristics for rAHF-PFM or turoctocog alfa trials using MAICs. After matching, annualized bleed rates (ABRs) were compared using weighted t-tests. RESULTS: Two rAHF-PFM trials and one turoctocog alfa trial were identified. In these trials, rFVIIIs were dosed thrice weekly or every other day; in LEOPOLD trials, BAY 81-8973 was dosed twice- or thrice weekly. Three MAICs were conducted because the two rAHF-PFM trials calculated ABRs differently, matching for age, race, and weight (turoctocog alfa only). BAY 81-8973 had similar ABR of all bleeds vs rAHF-PFM (two trials: 4.8 vs 6.3, 1.9 vs 1.8 [square root transform]) and lower ABR of spontaneous bleeds and trauma bleeds (2.6 vs 4.1, 2.1 vs 4.7; both P<0.05). BAY 81-8973 showed lower ABR of all bleeds and spontaneous bleeds vs turoctocog alfa (4.3 vs 6.5, 2.8 vs 4.3; both P<0.05) and similar ABR of trauma bleeds (1.5 vs 1.6). In subgroup analysis, twice-weekly BAY 81-8973 had similar ABRs of all bleeds, spontaneous bleeds, and trauma bleeds compared to rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa. CONCLUSION: This indirect comparison found that prophylaxis with BAY 81-8973, even including the lower frequency of two times a week and lower factor VIII consumption, has efficacy comparable to rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa, which were dosed thrice weekly or every other day. The use of IPD enabled adjustments for differences in calculation of ABRs and population characteristics between trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49381372016-07-21 Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor VIII for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A Pocoski, Jennifer Li, Nanxin Ayyagari, Rajeev Church, Nikki Maas Enriquez, Monika Xiang, Quer Kelkar, Sneha Du, Ella X Wu, Eric Q Xie, Jipan J Blood Med Original Research BACKGROUND: No head-to-head trials comparing recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products currently exist. This was a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 with antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM) and turoctocog alfa for the prophylaxis of severe hemophilia A. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify trials of rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa. Comparisons were conducted using BAY 81-8973 individual patient data (IPD) from LEOPOLD trials and published data from rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa trials. Differences in outcome reporting were reconciled using transformation of BAY 81-8973 IPD. Patients in pooled LEOPOLD trials were weighted to match baseline characteristics for rAHF-PFM or turoctocog alfa trials using MAICs. After matching, annualized bleed rates (ABRs) were compared using weighted t-tests. RESULTS: Two rAHF-PFM trials and one turoctocog alfa trial were identified. In these trials, rFVIIIs were dosed thrice weekly or every other day; in LEOPOLD trials, BAY 81-8973 was dosed twice- or thrice weekly. Three MAICs were conducted because the two rAHF-PFM trials calculated ABRs differently, matching for age, race, and weight (turoctocog alfa only). BAY 81-8973 had similar ABR of all bleeds vs rAHF-PFM (two trials: 4.8 vs 6.3, 1.9 vs 1.8 [square root transform]) and lower ABR of spontaneous bleeds and trauma bleeds (2.6 vs 4.1, 2.1 vs 4.7; both P<0.05). BAY 81-8973 showed lower ABR of all bleeds and spontaneous bleeds vs turoctocog alfa (4.3 vs 6.5, 2.8 vs 4.3; both P<0.05) and similar ABR of trauma bleeds (1.5 vs 1.6). In subgroup analysis, twice-weekly BAY 81-8973 had similar ABRs of all bleeds, spontaneous bleeds, and trauma bleeds compared to rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa. CONCLUSION: This indirect comparison found that prophylaxis with BAY 81-8973, even including the lower frequency of two times a week and lower factor VIII consumption, has efficacy comparable to rAHF-PFM and turoctocog alfa, which were dosed thrice weekly or every other day. The use of IPD enabled adjustments for differences in calculation of ABRs and population characteristics between trials. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4938137/ /pubmed/27445511 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S104074 Text en © 2016 Pocoski et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pocoski, Jennifer
Li, Nanxin
Ayyagari, Rajeev
Church, Nikki
Maas Enriquez, Monika
Xiang, Quer
Kelkar, Sneha
Du, Ella X
Wu, Eric Q
Xie, Jipan
Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor VIII for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A
title Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor VIII for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A
title_full Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor VIII for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A
title_fullStr Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor VIII for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A
title_full_unstemmed Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor VIII for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A
title_short Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor VIII for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A
title_sort matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of bay 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor viii for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia a
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445511
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S104074
work_keys_str_mv AT pocoskijennifer matchingadjustedindirectcomparisonsofefficacyofbay818973vstworecombinantfactorviiifortheprophylactictreatmentofseverehemophiliaa
AT linanxin matchingadjustedindirectcomparisonsofefficacyofbay818973vstworecombinantfactorviiifortheprophylactictreatmentofseverehemophiliaa
AT ayyagarirajeev matchingadjustedindirectcomparisonsofefficacyofbay818973vstworecombinantfactorviiifortheprophylactictreatmentofseverehemophiliaa
AT churchnikki matchingadjustedindirectcomparisonsofefficacyofbay818973vstworecombinantfactorviiifortheprophylactictreatmentofseverehemophiliaa
AT maasenriquezmonika matchingadjustedindirectcomparisonsofefficacyofbay818973vstworecombinantfactorviiifortheprophylactictreatmentofseverehemophiliaa
AT xiangquer matchingadjustedindirectcomparisonsofefficacyofbay818973vstworecombinantfactorviiifortheprophylactictreatmentofseverehemophiliaa
AT kelkarsneha matchingadjustedindirectcomparisonsofefficacyofbay818973vstworecombinantfactorviiifortheprophylactictreatmentofseverehemophiliaa
AT duellax matchingadjustedindirectcomparisonsofefficacyofbay818973vstworecombinantfactorviiifortheprophylactictreatmentofseverehemophiliaa
AT wuericq matchingadjustedindirectcomparisonsofefficacyofbay818973vstworecombinantfactorviiifortheprophylactictreatmentofseverehemophiliaa
AT xiejipan matchingadjustedindirectcomparisonsofefficacyofbay818973vstworecombinantfactorviiifortheprophylactictreatmentofseverehemophiliaa