Cargando…

A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials

Nowadays, the philosophy of treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is slowly evolving. Especially for the anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients, no standard therapy exists in this setting. Whether to choose doublet agents or single agent as salvage treatment remains fiercely debated. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Liang, Wu, Xiaobo, Hu, Chun, Zhang, Zhiying, Zhang, Le, Liang, Shujing, Xu, Yingchun, Zhang, Fengchun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445497
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S101423
_version_ 1782441815977230336
author Xu, Liang
Wu, Xiaobo
Hu, Chun
Zhang, Zhiying
Zhang, Le
Liang, Shujing
Xu, Yingchun
Zhang, Fengchun
author_facet Xu, Liang
Wu, Xiaobo
Hu, Chun
Zhang, Zhiying
Zhang, Le
Liang, Shujing
Xu, Yingchun
Zhang, Fengchun
author_sort Xu, Liang
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, the philosophy of treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is slowly evolving. Especially for the anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients, no standard therapy exists in this setting. Whether to choose doublet agents or single agent as salvage treatment remains fiercely debated. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to resolve this problem. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for Phase III randomized clinical trials (published before August 2015) comparing the efficacy and adverse effects between the combination therapy and single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients. The primary end point was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were the progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were used to evaluate the efficacy. Analyses were also performed to estimate the side effects and safety of both groups. In all, nine eligible randomized clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Improvements were proven in the doublet agents group on OS (HR 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.96, P=0.002), PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76–0.88, P<0.001), and ORR (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.34–2.21, P<0.001). Notably, subgroup analysis failed to favor the targeted agent-based combination in terms of OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89–1.31, P=0.365), PFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88–1.35, P=0.433), and ORR (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.69–3.71, P=0.278) compared with single agent. In addition, although more hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in the doublet agents group, they were acceptable and manageable. Taken together, when compared with single-agent therapy, doublet agents should be considered a treatment option because of the superior efficacy and the manageable safety profile for the prior anthracycline- and taxane-treated MBC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49381382016-07-21 A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials Xu, Liang Wu, Xiaobo Hu, Chun Zhang, Zhiying Zhang, Le Liang, Shujing Xu, Yingchun Zhang, Fengchun Onco Targets Ther Original Research Nowadays, the philosophy of treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is slowly evolving. Especially for the anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients, no standard therapy exists in this setting. Whether to choose doublet agents or single agent as salvage treatment remains fiercely debated. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to resolve this problem. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for Phase III randomized clinical trials (published before August 2015) comparing the efficacy and adverse effects between the combination therapy and single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients. The primary end point was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were the progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were used to evaluate the efficacy. Analyses were also performed to estimate the side effects and safety of both groups. In all, nine eligible randomized clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Improvements were proven in the doublet agents group on OS (HR 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.96, P=0.002), PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76–0.88, P<0.001), and ORR (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.34–2.21, P<0.001). Notably, subgroup analysis failed to favor the targeted agent-based combination in terms of OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89–1.31, P=0.365), PFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88–1.35, P=0.433), and ORR (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.69–3.71, P=0.278) compared with single agent. In addition, although more hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in the doublet agents group, they were acceptable and manageable. Taken together, when compared with single-agent therapy, doublet agents should be considered a treatment option because of the superior efficacy and the manageable safety profile for the prior anthracycline- and taxane-treated MBC patients. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4938138/ /pubmed/27445497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S101423 Text en © 2016 Xu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Xu, Liang
Wu, Xiaobo
Hu, Chun
Zhang, Zhiying
Zhang, Le
Liang, Shujing
Xu, Yingchun
Zhang, Fengchun
A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials
title A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials
title_full A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials
title_short A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials
title_sort meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized phase iii trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445497
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S101423
work_keys_str_mv AT xuliang ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT wuxiaobo ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT huchun ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT zhangzhiying ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT zhangle ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT liangshujing ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT xuyingchun ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT zhangfengchun ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT xuliang metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT wuxiaobo metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT huchun metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT zhangzhiying metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT zhangle metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT liangshujing metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT xuyingchun metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials
AT zhangfengchun metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials