Cargando…
A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials
Nowadays, the philosophy of treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is slowly evolving. Especially for the anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients, no standard therapy exists in this setting. Whether to choose doublet agents or single agent as salvage treatment remains fiercely debated. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S101423 |
_version_ | 1782441815977230336 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Liang Wu, Xiaobo Hu, Chun Zhang, Zhiying Zhang, Le Liang, Shujing Xu, Yingchun Zhang, Fengchun |
author_facet | Xu, Liang Wu, Xiaobo Hu, Chun Zhang, Zhiying Zhang, Le Liang, Shujing Xu, Yingchun Zhang, Fengchun |
author_sort | Xu, Liang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nowadays, the philosophy of treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is slowly evolving. Especially for the anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients, no standard therapy exists in this setting. Whether to choose doublet agents or single agent as salvage treatment remains fiercely debated. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to resolve this problem. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for Phase III randomized clinical trials (published before August 2015) comparing the efficacy and adverse effects between the combination therapy and single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients. The primary end point was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were the progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were used to evaluate the efficacy. Analyses were also performed to estimate the side effects and safety of both groups. In all, nine eligible randomized clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Improvements were proven in the doublet agents group on OS (HR 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.96, P=0.002), PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76–0.88, P<0.001), and ORR (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.34–2.21, P<0.001). Notably, subgroup analysis failed to favor the targeted agent-based combination in terms of OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89–1.31, P=0.365), PFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88–1.35, P=0.433), and ORR (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.69–3.71, P=0.278) compared with single agent. In addition, although more hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in the doublet agents group, they were acceptable and manageable. Taken together, when compared with single-agent therapy, doublet agents should be considered a treatment option because of the superior efficacy and the manageable safety profile for the prior anthracycline- and taxane-treated MBC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4938138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49381382016-07-21 A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials Xu, Liang Wu, Xiaobo Hu, Chun Zhang, Zhiying Zhang, Le Liang, Shujing Xu, Yingchun Zhang, Fengchun Onco Targets Ther Original Research Nowadays, the philosophy of treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is slowly evolving. Especially for the anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients, no standard therapy exists in this setting. Whether to choose doublet agents or single agent as salvage treatment remains fiercely debated. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to resolve this problem. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for Phase III randomized clinical trials (published before August 2015) comparing the efficacy and adverse effects between the combination therapy and single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients. The primary end point was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were the progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were used to evaluate the efficacy. Analyses were also performed to estimate the side effects and safety of both groups. In all, nine eligible randomized clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Improvements were proven in the doublet agents group on OS (HR 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.96, P=0.002), PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76–0.88, P<0.001), and ORR (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.34–2.21, P<0.001). Notably, subgroup analysis failed to favor the targeted agent-based combination in terms of OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89–1.31, P=0.365), PFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88–1.35, P=0.433), and ORR (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.69–3.71, P=0.278) compared with single agent. In addition, although more hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in the doublet agents group, they were acceptable and manageable. Taken together, when compared with single-agent therapy, doublet agents should be considered a treatment option because of the superior efficacy and the manageable safety profile for the prior anthracycline- and taxane-treated MBC patients. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4938138/ /pubmed/27445497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S101423 Text en © 2016 Xu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Xu, Liang Wu, Xiaobo Hu, Chun Zhang, Zhiying Zhang, Le Liang, Shujing Xu, Yingchun Zhang, Fengchun A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials |
title | A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials |
title_full | A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials |
title_fullStr | A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials |
title_short | A meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized Phase III trials |
title_sort | meta-analysis of combination therapy versus single-agent therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: results from nine randomized phase iii trials |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S101423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuliang ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT wuxiaobo ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT huchun ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT zhangzhiying ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT zhangle ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT liangshujing ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT xuyingchun ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT zhangfengchun ametaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT xuliang metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT wuxiaobo metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT huchun metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT zhangzhiying metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT zhangle metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT liangshujing metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT xuyingchun metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials AT zhangfengchun metaanalysisofcombinationtherapyversussingleagenttherapyinanthracyclineandtaxanepretreatedmetastaticbreastcancerresultsfromninerandomizedphaseiiitrials |