Cargando…

A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) applications and technologies are fast advancing. New SCS technologies are being used increasingly in the clinical environment, but often there is a lag period between the clinical application and the publishing of high-quality evidence on safety and efficacy. Recent de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verrills, Paul, Sinclair, Chantelle, Barnard, Adele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445503
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S108884
_version_ 1782441818279903232
author Verrills, Paul
Sinclair, Chantelle
Barnard, Adele
author_facet Verrills, Paul
Sinclair, Chantelle
Barnard, Adele
author_sort Verrills, Paul
collection PubMed
description Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) applications and technologies are fast advancing. New SCS technologies are being used increasingly in the clinical environment, but often there is a lag period between the clinical application and the publishing of high-quality evidence on safety and efficacy. Recent developments will undoubtedly expand the applicability of SCS, allowing more effective and individualized treatment for patients, and may have the potential to salvage patients who have previously failed neuromodulation. Already, high-level evidence exists for the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness (Level I–II) of traditional SCS therapies in the treatment of chronic refractory low back with predominant limb pain (regardless of surgical history). More than half of all patients with chronic painful conditions experience sustained and significant levels of pain reduction following SCS treatment. Although only limited evidence exists for burst stimulation, there is now Level I evidence for both dorsal root ganglion SCS and high-frequency SCS that demonstrates compelling results compared with traditional therapies. The body of evidence built on traditional SCS research may be redundant, with newer iterations of SCS therapies such as dorsal root ganglion SCS, high-frequency SCS, and burst SCS. A number of variables have been identified that can affect SCS efficacy: implanter experience, appropriate patient selection, etiologies of patient pain, existence of comorbidities, including psychiatric illness, smoking status, and delay to SCS implant following pain onset. Overall, scientific literature demonstrates SCS to be a safe, effective, and drug-free treatment option for many chronic pain etiologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49381482016-07-21 A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain Verrills, Paul Sinclair, Chantelle Barnard, Adele J Pain Res Review Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) applications and technologies are fast advancing. New SCS technologies are being used increasingly in the clinical environment, but often there is a lag period between the clinical application and the publishing of high-quality evidence on safety and efficacy. Recent developments will undoubtedly expand the applicability of SCS, allowing more effective and individualized treatment for patients, and may have the potential to salvage patients who have previously failed neuromodulation. Already, high-level evidence exists for the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness (Level I–II) of traditional SCS therapies in the treatment of chronic refractory low back with predominant limb pain (regardless of surgical history). More than half of all patients with chronic painful conditions experience sustained and significant levels of pain reduction following SCS treatment. Although only limited evidence exists for burst stimulation, there is now Level I evidence for both dorsal root ganglion SCS and high-frequency SCS that demonstrates compelling results compared with traditional therapies. The body of evidence built on traditional SCS research may be redundant, with newer iterations of SCS therapies such as dorsal root ganglion SCS, high-frequency SCS, and burst SCS. A number of variables have been identified that can affect SCS efficacy: implanter experience, appropriate patient selection, etiologies of patient pain, existence of comorbidities, including psychiatric illness, smoking status, and delay to SCS implant following pain onset. Overall, scientific literature demonstrates SCS to be a safe, effective, and drug-free treatment option for many chronic pain etiologies. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4938148/ /pubmed/27445503 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S108884 Text en © 2016 Verrills et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Verrills, Paul
Sinclair, Chantelle
Barnard, Adele
A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain
title A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain
title_full A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain
title_fullStr A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain
title_full_unstemmed A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain
title_short A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain
title_sort review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445503
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S108884
work_keys_str_mv AT verrillspaul areviewofspinalcordstimulationsystemsforchronicpain
AT sinclairchantelle areviewofspinalcordstimulationsystemsforchronicpain
AT barnardadele areviewofspinalcordstimulationsystemsforchronicpain
AT verrillspaul reviewofspinalcordstimulationsystemsforchronicpain
AT sinclairchantelle reviewofspinalcordstimulationsystemsforchronicpain
AT barnardadele reviewofspinalcordstimulationsystemsforchronicpain