Cargando…

Experimental Insights into the Cognitive Significance of Early Stone Tools

Stone-flaking technology is the most enduring evidence for the evolving cognitive abilities of our early ancestors. Flake-making was mastered by African hominins ~3.3 ma, followed by the appearance of handaxes ~1.75 ma and complex stone reduction strategies by ~1.6 ma. Handaxes are stones flaked on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Mark W., Perston, Yinika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158803
_version_ 1782441855973064704
author Moore, Mark W.
Perston, Yinika
author_facet Moore, Mark W.
Perston, Yinika
author_sort Moore, Mark W.
collection PubMed
description Stone-flaking technology is the most enduring evidence for the evolving cognitive abilities of our early ancestors. Flake-making was mastered by African hominins ~3.3 ma, followed by the appearance of handaxes ~1.75 ma and complex stone reduction strategies by ~1.6 ma. Handaxes are stones flaked on two opposed faces (‘bifacially’), creating a robust, sharp-edged tool, and complex reduction strategies are reflected in strategic prior flaking to prepare or ‘predetermine’ the nature of a later flake removal that served as a tool blank. These technologies are interpreted as major milestones in hominin evolution that reflect the development of higher-order cognitive abilities, and the presence and nature of these technologies are used to track movements of early hominin species or ‘cultures’ in the archaeological record. However, the warranting argument that certain variations in stone tool morphologies are caused by differences in cognitive abilities relies on analogy with technical replications by skilled modern stoneworkers, and this raises the possibility that researchers are projecting modern approaches to technical problems onto our non-modern hominin ancestors. Here we present the results of novel experiments that randomise flake removal and disrupt the modern stoneworker’s inclination to use higher-order reasoning to guide the stone reduction process. Although our protocols prevented goal-directed replication of stone tool types, the experimental assemblage is morphologically standardised and includes handaxe-like ‘protobifaces’ and cores with apparently ‘predetermined’ flake removals. This shows that the geometrical constraints of fracture mechanics can give rise to what appear to be highly-designed stoneworking products and techniques when multiple flakes are removed randomly from a stone core.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49384302016-07-22 Experimental Insights into the Cognitive Significance of Early Stone Tools Moore, Mark W. Perston, Yinika PLoS One Research Article Stone-flaking technology is the most enduring evidence for the evolving cognitive abilities of our early ancestors. Flake-making was mastered by African hominins ~3.3 ma, followed by the appearance of handaxes ~1.75 ma and complex stone reduction strategies by ~1.6 ma. Handaxes are stones flaked on two opposed faces (‘bifacially’), creating a robust, sharp-edged tool, and complex reduction strategies are reflected in strategic prior flaking to prepare or ‘predetermine’ the nature of a later flake removal that served as a tool blank. These technologies are interpreted as major milestones in hominin evolution that reflect the development of higher-order cognitive abilities, and the presence and nature of these technologies are used to track movements of early hominin species or ‘cultures’ in the archaeological record. However, the warranting argument that certain variations in stone tool morphologies are caused by differences in cognitive abilities relies on analogy with technical replications by skilled modern stoneworkers, and this raises the possibility that researchers are projecting modern approaches to technical problems onto our non-modern hominin ancestors. Here we present the results of novel experiments that randomise flake removal and disrupt the modern stoneworker’s inclination to use higher-order reasoning to guide the stone reduction process. Although our protocols prevented goal-directed replication of stone tool types, the experimental assemblage is morphologically standardised and includes handaxe-like ‘protobifaces’ and cores with apparently ‘predetermined’ flake removals. This shows that the geometrical constraints of fracture mechanics can give rise to what appear to be highly-designed stoneworking products and techniques when multiple flakes are removed randomly from a stone core. Public Library of Science 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938430/ /pubmed/27392022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158803 Text en © 2016 Moore, Perston http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moore, Mark W.
Perston, Yinika
Experimental Insights into the Cognitive Significance of Early Stone Tools
title Experimental Insights into the Cognitive Significance of Early Stone Tools
title_full Experimental Insights into the Cognitive Significance of Early Stone Tools
title_fullStr Experimental Insights into the Cognitive Significance of Early Stone Tools
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Insights into the Cognitive Significance of Early Stone Tools
title_short Experimental Insights into the Cognitive Significance of Early Stone Tools
title_sort experimental insights into the cognitive significance of early stone tools
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158803
work_keys_str_mv AT mooremarkw experimentalinsightsintothecognitivesignificanceofearlystonetools
AT perstonyinika experimentalinsightsintothecognitivesignificanceofearlystonetools