Cargando…

Health Worker Compliance with a ‘Test And Treat’ Malaria Case Management Protocol in Papua New Guinea

The Papua New Guinea (PNG) Department of Health introduced a ‘test and treat’ malaria case management protocol in 2011. This study assesses health worker compliance with the test and treat protocol on a wide range of measures, examines self-reported barriers to health worker compliance as well as he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pulford, Justin, Smith, Iso, Mueller, Ivo, Siba, Peter M., Hetzel, Manuel W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158780
_version_ 1782441867090067456
author Pulford, Justin
Smith, Iso
Mueller, Ivo
Siba, Peter M.
Hetzel, Manuel W.
author_facet Pulford, Justin
Smith, Iso
Mueller, Ivo
Siba, Peter M.
Hetzel, Manuel W.
author_sort Pulford, Justin
collection PubMed
description The Papua New Guinea (PNG) Department of Health introduced a ‘test and treat’ malaria case management protocol in 2011. This study assesses health worker compliance with the test and treat protocol on a wide range of measures, examines self-reported barriers to health worker compliance as well as health worker attitudes towards the test and treat protocol. Data were collected by cross-sectional survey conducted in randomly selected primary health care facilities in 2012 and repeated in 2014. The combined survey data included passive observation of current or recently febrile patients (N = 771) and interviewer administered questionnaires completed with health workers (N = 265). Across the two surveys, 77.6% of patients were tested for malaria infection by rapid diagnostic test (RDT) or microscopy, 65.6% of confirmed malaria cases were prescribed the correct antimalarials and 15.3% of febrile patients who tested negative for malaria infection were incorrectly prescribed an antimalarial. Overall compliance with a strictly defined test and treat protocol was 62.8%. A reluctance to test current/recently febrile patients for malaria infection by RDT or microscopy in the absence of acute malaria symptoms, reserving recommended antimalarials for confirmed malaria cases only and choosing to clinically diagnose a malaria infection, despite a negative RDT result were the most frequently reported barriers to protocol compliance. Attitudinal support for the test and treat protocol, as assessed by a nine-item measure, improved across time. In conclusion, health worker compliance with the full test and treat malaria protocol requires improvement in PNG and additional health worker support will likely be required to achieve this. The broader evidence base would suggest any such support should be delivered over a longer period of time, be multi-dimensional and multi-modal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49385052016-07-22 Health Worker Compliance with a ‘Test And Treat’ Malaria Case Management Protocol in Papua New Guinea Pulford, Justin Smith, Iso Mueller, Ivo Siba, Peter M. Hetzel, Manuel W. PLoS One Research Article The Papua New Guinea (PNG) Department of Health introduced a ‘test and treat’ malaria case management protocol in 2011. This study assesses health worker compliance with the test and treat protocol on a wide range of measures, examines self-reported barriers to health worker compliance as well as health worker attitudes towards the test and treat protocol. Data were collected by cross-sectional survey conducted in randomly selected primary health care facilities in 2012 and repeated in 2014. The combined survey data included passive observation of current or recently febrile patients (N = 771) and interviewer administered questionnaires completed with health workers (N = 265). Across the two surveys, 77.6% of patients were tested for malaria infection by rapid diagnostic test (RDT) or microscopy, 65.6% of confirmed malaria cases were prescribed the correct antimalarials and 15.3% of febrile patients who tested negative for malaria infection were incorrectly prescribed an antimalarial. Overall compliance with a strictly defined test and treat protocol was 62.8%. A reluctance to test current/recently febrile patients for malaria infection by RDT or microscopy in the absence of acute malaria symptoms, reserving recommended antimalarials for confirmed malaria cases only and choosing to clinically diagnose a malaria infection, despite a negative RDT result were the most frequently reported barriers to protocol compliance. Attitudinal support for the test and treat protocol, as assessed by a nine-item measure, improved across time. In conclusion, health worker compliance with the full test and treat malaria protocol requires improvement in PNG and additional health worker support will likely be required to achieve this. The broader evidence base would suggest any such support should be delivered over a longer period of time, be multi-dimensional and multi-modal. Public Library of Science 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938505/ /pubmed/27391594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158780 Text en © 2016 Pulford et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pulford, Justin
Smith, Iso
Mueller, Ivo
Siba, Peter M.
Hetzel, Manuel W.
Health Worker Compliance with a ‘Test And Treat’ Malaria Case Management Protocol in Papua New Guinea
title Health Worker Compliance with a ‘Test And Treat’ Malaria Case Management Protocol in Papua New Guinea
title_full Health Worker Compliance with a ‘Test And Treat’ Malaria Case Management Protocol in Papua New Guinea
title_fullStr Health Worker Compliance with a ‘Test And Treat’ Malaria Case Management Protocol in Papua New Guinea
title_full_unstemmed Health Worker Compliance with a ‘Test And Treat’ Malaria Case Management Protocol in Papua New Guinea
title_short Health Worker Compliance with a ‘Test And Treat’ Malaria Case Management Protocol in Papua New Guinea
title_sort health worker compliance with a ‘test and treat’ malaria case management protocol in papua new guinea
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158780
work_keys_str_mv AT pulfordjustin healthworkercompliancewithatestandtreatmalariacasemanagementprotocolinpapuanewguinea
AT smithiso healthworkercompliancewithatestandtreatmalariacasemanagementprotocolinpapuanewguinea
AT muellerivo healthworkercompliancewithatestandtreatmalariacasemanagementprotocolinpapuanewguinea
AT sibapeterm healthworkercompliancewithatestandtreatmalariacasemanagementprotocolinpapuanewguinea
AT hetzelmanuelw healthworkercompliancewithatestandtreatmalariacasemanagementprotocolinpapuanewguinea