Cargando…
A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating the Combination of Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin Together with Capecitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Esophago-Gastric Cancer
INTRODUCTION: Current treatment options for advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC) are still unsatisfactory. The aim of this prospective phase Ib/II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen, AVDCX, consisting of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin together with capecitabine and be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157548 |
_version_ | 1782441868911443968 |
---|---|
author | Brenner, Baruch Sarfaty, Michal Purim, Ofer Kundel, Yulia Amit, Limor Abramovich, Amir Sadeh Gonik, Udi Idelevich, Efraim Gordon, Noa Medalia, Gal Sulkes, Aaron |
author_facet | Brenner, Baruch Sarfaty, Michal Purim, Ofer Kundel, Yulia Amit, Limor Abramovich, Amir Sadeh Gonik, Udi Idelevich, Efraim Gordon, Noa Medalia, Gal Sulkes, Aaron |
author_sort | Brenner, Baruch |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Current treatment options for advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC) are still unsatisfactory. The aim of this prospective phase Ib/II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen, AVDCX, consisting of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin together with capecitabine and bevacizumab, in AEGC. METHODS: Patients with AEGC received treatment with different dose levels of AVDCX (cisplatin and docetaxel 25–35 mg/m(2), days 1,8, capecitabine 1,600 mg/m(2) days 1–14, bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, day 1, Q:21 days). The study's primary objectives were to establish the recommended phase II doses of docetaxel and cisplatin in AVDCX (phase Ib part) and to determine the tumor response rate (phase II part). RESULTS: The study was closed early, after the accrual of 22 patients, due to accumulating toxicity-related deaths. The median age was 59 years and 77% of patients had gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. Grade ≥3 adverse events were documented in 18 patients (82%), usually neutropenia (36%), fatigue (54%) or diarrhea (23%). There were three fatal toxicities (14%): mesenteric thromboembolism, gastric perforation and pancytopenic sepsis. The recommended phase II doses of cisplatin and docetaxel were determined to be 25 mg/m(2) and 30 mg/m(2), respectively. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for response: 12 (54%) had partial response (PR), 4 (18%) had stable disease (SD) and none had complete response (CR). Hence, the objective response rate (CR+PR) was 54% and the disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 72%. For the 17 patients treated at the MTD, the objective response rate was 41% and the disease control rate was 88%. The median overall survival (OS) for these patients was 13.9 months (range, 1.5–52.2 months) and the median progression-free survival was 7.6 months (range, 1.3–26.6 months). The 2-year OS rate reached 23.7%. CONCLUSIONS: AVDCX was associated with a high rate of regimen related fatal adverse events and is not appropriate for further development in AEGC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00845884, |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4938513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49385132016-07-22 A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating the Combination of Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin Together with Capecitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Esophago-Gastric Cancer Brenner, Baruch Sarfaty, Michal Purim, Ofer Kundel, Yulia Amit, Limor Abramovich, Amir Sadeh Gonik, Udi Idelevich, Efraim Gordon, Noa Medalia, Gal Sulkes, Aaron PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Current treatment options for advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC) are still unsatisfactory. The aim of this prospective phase Ib/II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen, AVDCX, consisting of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin together with capecitabine and bevacizumab, in AEGC. METHODS: Patients with AEGC received treatment with different dose levels of AVDCX (cisplatin and docetaxel 25–35 mg/m(2), days 1,8, capecitabine 1,600 mg/m(2) days 1–14, bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, day 1, Q:21 days). The study's primary objectives were to establish the recommended phase II doses of docetaxel and cisplatin in AVDCX (phase Ib part) and to determine the tumor response rate (phase II part). RESULTS: The study was closed early, after the accrual of 22 patients, due to accumulating toxicity-related deaths. The median age was 59 years and 77% of patients had gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. Grade ≥3 adverse events were documented in 18 patients (82%), usually neutropenia (36%), fatigue (54%) or diarrhea (23%). There were three fatal toxicities (14%): mesenteric thromboembolism, gastric perforation and pancytopenic sepsis. The recommended phase II doses of cisplatin and docetaxel were determined to be 25 mg/m(2) and 30 mg/m(2), respectively. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for response: 12 (54%) had partial response (PR), 4 (18%) had stable disease (SD) and none had complete response (CR). Hence, the objective response rate (CR+PR) was 54% and the disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 72%. For the 17 patients treated at the MTD, the objective response rate was 41% and the disease control rate was 88%. The median overall survival (OS) for these patients was 13.9 months (range, 1.5–52.2 months) and the median progression-free survival was 7.6 months (range, 1.3–26.6 months). The 2-year OS rate reached 23.7%. CONCLUSIONS: AVDCX was associated with a high rate of regimen related fatal adverse events and is not appropriate for further development in AEGC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00845884, Public Library of Science 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938513/ /pubmed/27390847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157548 Text en © 2016 Brenner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brenner, Baruch Sarfaty, Michal Purim, Ofer Kundel, Yulia Amit, Limor Abramovich, Amir Sadeh Gonik, Udi Idelevich, Efraim Gordon, Noa Medalia, Gal Sulkes, Aaron A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating the Combination of Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin Together with Capecitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Esophago-Gastric Cancer |
title | A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating the Combination of Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin Together with Capecitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Esophago-Gastric Cancer |
title_full | A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating the Combination of Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin Together with Capecitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Esophago-Gastric Cancer |
title_fullStr | A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating the Combination of Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin Together with Capecitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Esophago-Gastric Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating the Combination of Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin Together with Capecitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Esophago-Gastric Cancer |
title_short | A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating the Combination of Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin Together with Capecitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Esophago-Gastric Cancer |
title_sort | phase ib/ii study evaluating the combination of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin together with capecitabine and bevacizumab in patients with advanced esophago-gastric cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157548 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brennerbaruch aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT sarfatymichal aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT purimofer aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT kundelyulia aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT amitlimor aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT abramovichamir aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT sadehgonikudi aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT idelevichefraim aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT gordonnoa aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT medaliagal aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT sulkesaaron aphaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT brennerbaruch phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT sarfatymichal phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT purimofer phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT kundelyulia phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT amitlimor phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT abramovichamir phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT sadehgonikudi phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT idelevichefraim phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT gordonnoa phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT medaliagal phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer AT sulkesaaron phaseibiistudyevaluatingthecombinationofweeklydocetaxelandcisplatintogetherwithcapecitabineandbevacizumabinpatientswithadvancedesophagogastriccancer |