Cargando…

A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting

Electron beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) are two advanced rapid prototyping manufacturing technologies capable of fabricating complex structures and geometric shapes from metallic materials using computer tomography (CT) and Computer-aided Design (CAD) data. Compared to traditio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hong, Zhao, Bingjing, Liu, Changkui, Wang, Chao, Tan, Xinying, Hu, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158513
_version_ 1782441888269205504
author Wang, Hong
Zhao, Bingjing
Liu, Changkui
Wang, Chao
Tan, Xinying
Hu, Min
author_facet Wang, Hong
Zhao, Bingjing
Liu, Changkui
Wang, Chao
Tan, Xinying
Hu, Min
author_sort Wang, Hong
collection PubMed
description Electron beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) are two advanced rapid prototyping manufacturing technologies capable of fabricating complex structures and geometric shapes from metallic materials using computer tomography (CT) and Computer-aided Design (CAD) data. Compared to traditional technologies used for metallic products, EBM and SLM alter the mechanical, physical and chemical properties, which are closely related to the biocompatibility of metallic products. In this study, we evaluate and compare the biocompatibility, including cytocompatibility, haemocompatibility, skin irritation and skin sensitivity of Ti6Al4V fabricated by EBM and SLM. The results were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Both the EBM and SLM Ti6Al4V exhibited good cytobiocompatibility. The haemolytic ratios of the SLM and EBM were 2.24% and 2.46%, respectively, which demonstrated good haemocompatibility. The EBM and SLM Ti6Al4V samples showed no dermal irritation when exposed to rabbits. In a delayed hypersensitivity test, no skin allergic reaction from the EBM or the SLM Ti6Al4V was observed in guinea pigs. Based on these results, Ti6Al4V fabricated by EBM and SLM were good cytobiocompatible, haemocompatible, non-irritant and non-sensitizing materials. Although the data for cell adhesion, proliferation, ALP activity and the haemolytic ratio was higher for the SLM group, there were no significant differences between the different manufacturing methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49386012016-07-22 A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting Wang, Hong Zhao, Bingjing Liu, Changkui Wang, Chao Tan, Xinying Hu, Min PLoS One Research Article Electron beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) are two advanced rapid prototyping manufacturing technologies capable of fabricating complex structures and geometric shapes from metallic materials using computer tomography (CT) and Computer-aided Design (CAD) data. Compared to traditional technologies used for metallic products, EBM and SLM alter the mechanical, physical and chemical properties, which are closely related to the biocompatibility of metallic products. In this study, we evaluate and compare the biocompatibility, including cytocompatibility, haemocompatibility, skin irritation and skin sensitivity of Ti6Al4V fabricated by EBM and SLM. The results were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Both the EBM and SLM Ti6Al4V exhibited good cytobiocompatibility. The haemolytic ratios of the SLM and EBM were 2.24% and 2.46%, respectively, which demonstrated good haemocompatibility. The EBM and SLM Ti6Al4V samples showed no dermal irritation when exposed to rabbits. In a delayed hypersensitivity test, no skin allergic reaction from the EBM or the SLM Ti6Al4V was observed in guinea pigs. Based on these results, Ti6Al4V fabricated by EBM and SLM were good cytobiocompatible, haemocompatible, non-irritant and non-sensitizing materials. Although the data for cell adhesion, proliferation, ALP activity and the haemolytic ratio was higher for the SLM group, there were no significant differences between the different manufacturing methods. Public Library of Science 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938601/ /pubmed/27391895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158513 Text en © 2016 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Hong
Zhao, Bingjing
Liu, Changkui
Wang, Chao
Tan, Xinying
Hu, Min
A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting
title A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting
title_full A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting
title_fullStr A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting
title_short A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting
title_sort comparison of biocompatibility of a titanium alloy fabricated by electron beam melting and selective laser melting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158513
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghong acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT zhaobingjing acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT liuchangkui acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT wangchao acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT tanxinying acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT humin acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT wanghong comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT zhaobingjing comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT liuchangkui comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT wangchao comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT tanxinying comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting
AT humin comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting