Cargando…
A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting
Electron beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) are two advanced rapid prototyping manufacturing technologies capable of fabricating complex structures and geometric shapes from metallic materials using computer tomography (CT) and Computer-aided Design (CAD) data. Compared to traditio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158513 |
_version_ | 1782441888269205504 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Hong Zhao, Bingjing Liu, Changkui Wang, Chao Tan, Xinying Hu, Min |
author_facet | Wang, Hong Zhao, Bingjing Liu, Changkui Wang, Chao Tan, Xinying Hu, Min |
author_sort | Wang, Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electron beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) are two advanced rapid prototyping manufacturing technologies capable of fabricating complex structures and geometric shapes from metallic materials using computer tomography (CT) and Computer-aided Design (CAD) data. Compared to traditional technologies used for metallic products, EBM and SLM alter the mechanical, physical and chemical properties, which are closely related to the biocompatibility of metallic products. In this study, we evaluate and compare the biocompatibility, including cytocompatibility, haemocompatibility, skin irritation and skin sensitivity of Ti6Al4V fabricated by EBM and SLM. The results were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Both the EBM and SLM Ti6Al4V exhibited good cytobiocompatibility. The haemolytic ratios of the SLM and EBM were 2.24% and 2.46%, respectively, which demonstrated good haemocompatibility. The EBM and SLM Ti6Al4V samples showed no dermal irritation when exposed to rabbits. In a delayed hypersensitivity test, no skin allergic reaction from the EBM or the SLM Ti6Al4V was observed in guinea pigs. Based on these results, Ti6Al4V fabricated by EBM and SLM were good cytobiocompatible, haemocompatible, non-irritant and non-sensitizing materials. Although the data for cell adhesion, proliferation, ALP activity and the haemolytic ratio was higher for the SLM group, there were no significant differences between the different manufacturing methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4938601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49386012016-07-22 A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting Wang, Hong Zhao, Bingjing Liu, Changkui Wang, Chao Tan, Xinying Hu, Min PLoS One Research Article Electron beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) are two advanced rapid prototyping manufacturing technologies capable of fabricating complex structures and geometric shapes from metallic materials using computer tomography (CT) and Computer-aided Design (CAD) data. Compared to traditional technologies used for metallic products, EBM and SLM alter the mechanical, physical and chemical properties, which are closely related to the biocompatibility of metallic products. In this study, we evaluate and compare the biocompatibility, including cytocompatibility, haemocompatibility, skin irritation and skin sensitivity of Ti6Al4V fabricated by EBM and SLM. The results were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Both the EBM and SLM Ti6Al4V exhibited good cytobiocompatibility. The haemolytic ratios of the SLM and EBM were 2.24% and 2.46%, respectively, which demonstrated good haemocompatibility. The EBM and SLM Ti6Al4V samples showed no dermal irritation when exposed to rabbits. In a delayed hypersensitivity test, no skin allergic reaction from the EBM or the SLM Ti6Al4V was observed in guinea pigs. Based on these results, Ti6Al4V fabricated by EBM and SLM were good cytobiocompatible, haemocompatible, non-irritant and non-sensitizing materials. Although the data for cell adhesion, proliferation, ALP activity and the haemolytic ratio was higher for the SLM group, there were no significant differences between the different manufacturing methods. Public Library of Science 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938601/ /pubmed/27391895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158513 Text en © 2016 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Hong Zhao, Bingjing Liu, Changkui Wang, Chao Tan, Xinying Hu, Min A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting |
title | A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting |
title_full | A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting |
title_short | A Comparison of Biocompatibility of a Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting |
title_sort | comparison of biocompatibility of a titanium alloy fabricated by electron beam melting and selective laser melting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghong acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT zhaobingjing acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT liuchangkui acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT wangchao acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT tanxinying acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT humin acomparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT wanghong comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT zhaobingjing comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT liuchangkui comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT wangchao comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT tanxinying comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting AT humin comparisonofbiocompatibilityofatitaniumalloyfabricatedbyelectronbeammeltingandselectivelasermelting |