Cargando…

A Blind Test of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis

The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH) states that North America was devastated by some sort of extraterrestrial event ~12,800 calendar years before present. Two fundamental questions persist in the debate over the YDIH: Can the results of analyses for purported impact indicators be reproduced?...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holliday, Vance, Surovell, Todd, Johnson, Eileen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155470
_version_ 1782441888976994304
author Holliday, Vance
Surovell, Todd
Johnson, Eileen
author_facet Holliday, Vance
Surovell, Todd
Johnson, Eileen
author_sort Holliday, Vance
collection PubMed
description The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH) states that North America was devastated by some sort of extraterrestrial event ~12,800 calendar years before present. Two fundamental questions persist in the debate over the YDIH: Can the results of analyses for purported impact indicators be reproduced? And are the indicators unique to the lower YD boundary (YDB), i.e., ~12.8k cal yrs BP? A test reported here presents the results of analyses that address these questions. Two different labs analyzed identical splits of samples collected at, above, and below the ~12.8ka zone at the Lubbock Lake archaeological site (LL) in northwest Texas. Both labs reported similar variation in levels of magnetic micrograins (>300 mg/kg >12.8ka and <11.5ka, but <150 mg/kg 12.8ka to 11.5ka). Analysis for magnetic microspheres in one split, reported elsewhere, produced very low to nonexistent levels throughout the section. In the other split, reported here, the levels of magnetic microspherules and nanodiamonds are low or nonexistent at, below, and above the YDB with the notable exception of a sample <11,500 cal years old. In that sample the claimed impact proxies were recovered at abundances two to four orders of magnitude above that from the other samples. Reproducibility of at least some analyses are problematic. In particular, no standard criteria exist for identification of magnetic spheres. Moreover, the purported impact proxies are not unique to the YDB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49386042016-07-22 A Blind Test of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis Holliday, Vance Surovell, Todd Johnson, Eileen PLoS One Research Article The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH) states that North America was devastated by some sort of extraterrestrial event ~12,800 calendar years before present. Two fundamental questions persist in the debate over the YDIH: Can the results of analyses for purported impact indicators be reproduced? And are the indicators unique to the lower YD boundary (YDB), i.e., ~12.8k cal yrs BP? A test reported here presents the results of analyses that address these questions. Two different labs analyzed identical splits of samples collected at, above, and below the ~12.8ka zone at the Lubbock Lake archaeological site (LL) in northwest Texas. Both labs reported similar variation in levels of magnetic micrograins (>300 mg/kg >12.8ka and <11.5ka, but <150 mg/kg 12.8ka to 11.5ka). Analysis for magnetic microspheres in one split, reported elsewhere, produced very low to nonexistent levels throughout the section. In the other split, reported here, the levels of magnetic microspherules and nanodiamonds are low or nonexistent at, below, and above the YDB with the notable exception of a sample <11,500 cal years old. In that sample the claimed impact proxies were recovered at abundances two to four orders of magnitude above that from the other samples. Reproducibility of at least some analyses are problematic. In particular, no standard criteria exist for identification of magnetic spheres. Moreover, the purported impact proxies are not unique to the YDB. Public Library of Science 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938604/ /pubmed/27391147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155470 Text en © 2016 Holliday et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Holliday, Vance
Surovell, Todd
Johnson, Eileen
A Blind Test of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
title A Blind Test of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
title_full A Blind Test of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
title_fullStr A Blind Test of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed A Blind Test of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
title_short A Blind Test of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
title_sort blind test of the younger dryas impact hypothesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155470
work_keys_str_mv AT hollidayvance ablindtestoftheyoungerdryasimpacthypothesis
AT surovelltodd ablindtestoftheyoungerdryasimpacthypothesis
AT johnsoneileen ablindtestoftheyoungerdryasimpacthypothesis
AT hollidayvance blindtestoftheyoungerdryasimpacthypothesis
AT surovelltodd blindtestoftheyoungerdryasimpacthypothesis
AT johnsoneileen blindtestoftheyoungerdryasimpacthypothesis