Cargando…

Implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands: results of a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Child mortality in the Netherlands declined gradually in the past decades. In total 1130 children and youth aged 0 to 19 years died in 2014 (i.e. 29.4 per 100,000 live births). A better understanding of the background and the circumstances surrounding the death of children as well as the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gijzen, Sandra, Hilhorst, Michaëla I., L’Hoir, Monique P., Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M., Need, Ariana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1500-9
_version_ 1782441927497482240
author Gijzen, Sandra
Hilhorst, Michaëla I.
L’Hoir, Monique P.
Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M.
Need, Ariana
author_facet Gijzen, Sandra
Hilhorst, Michaëla I.
L’Hoir, Monique P.
Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M.
Need, Ariana
author_sort Gijzen, Sandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Child mortality in the Netherlands declined gradually in the past decades. In total 1130 children and youth aged 0 to 19 years died in 2014 (i.e. 29.4 per 100,000 live births). A better understanding of the background and the circumstances surrounding the death of children as well as the manner and cause of death may lead to preventive measures. Child Death Review (CDR) is a method to systematically analyze child deaths by a multidisciplinary team to identify avoidable factors that may have contributed to the death and to give directions for prevention. CDR could be an addition to further reduce avoidable child deaths in the Netherlands. The purpose of this study is to explore the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the pilot-implementation of CDR in a Dutch region. The results are translated in recommendations for future implementation of the CDR method in the Netherlands. METHODS: Children who lived in the pilot region and died aged 29 days after birth until 2 years were, after parental consent, included for reviewing by a regional CDR team. Eighteen logs and seven transcribed records of CDR meetings concerning 6 deceased children were analyzed using Atlas ti. The SWOT framework was used to identify important themes. RESULTS: The most important strengths identified were the expertise of and cooperation within the CDR team and the available materials. An important weakness was the poor cooperation of some professional groups. The fact that parents and professionals endorse the objective of CDR was an important opportunity. The lack of statutory basis was a threat. CONCLUSIONS: Many obstacles need to be taken away before large-scale implementation of CDR in the Netherlands becomes possible. The most important precondition for implementation is the acceptance among professionals and the statutory basis of the CDR method. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1500-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49389292016-07-10 Implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands: results of a pilot study Gijzen, Sandra Hilhorst, Michaëla I. L’Hoir, Monique P. Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M. Need, Ariana BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Child mortality in the Netherlands declined gradually in the past decades. In total 1130 children and youth aged 0 to 19 years died in 2014 (i.e. 29.4 per 100,000 live births). A better understanding of the background and the circumstances surrounding the death of children as well as the manner and cause of death may lead to preventive measures. Child Death Review (CDR) is a method to systematically analyze child deaths by a multidisciplinary team to identify avoidable factors that may have contributed to the death and to give directions for prevention. CDR could be an addition to further reduce avoidable child deaths in the Netherlands. The purpose of this study is to explore the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the pilot-implementation of CDR in a Dutch region. The results are translated in recommendations for future implementation of the CDR method in the Netherlands. METHODS: Children who lived in the pilot region and died aged 29 days after birth until 2 years were, after parental consent, included for reviewing by a regional CDR team. Eighteen logs and seven transcribed records of CDR meetings concerning 6 deceased children were analyzed using Atlas ti. The SWOT framework was used to identify important themes. RESULTS: The most important strengths identified were the expertise of and cooperation within the CDR team and the available materials. An important weakness was the poor cooperation of some professional groups. The fact that parents and professionals endorse the objective of CDR was an important opportunity. The lack of statutory basis was a threat. CONCLUSIONS: Many obstacles need to be taken away before large-scale implementation of CDR in the Netherlands becomes possible. The most important precondition for implementation is the acceptance among professionals and the statutory basis of the CDR method. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1500-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938929/ /pubmed/27392027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1500-9 Text en © Gijzen et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gijzen, Sandra
Hilhorst, Michaëla I.
L’Hoir, Monique P.
Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M.
Need, Ariana
Implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands: results of a pilot study
title Implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands: results of a pilot study
title_full Implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands: results of a pilot study
title_fullStr Implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands: results of a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands: results of a pilot study
title_short Implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands: results of a pilot study
title_sort implementation of child death review in the netherlands: results of a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1500-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gijzensandra implementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlandsresultsofapilotstudy
AT hilhorstmichaelai implementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlandsresultsofapilotstudy
AT lhoirmoniquep implementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlandsresultsofapilotstudy
AT boereboonekampmagdam implementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlandsresultsofapilotstudy
AT needariana implementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlandsresultsofapilotstudy