Cargando…

Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the extent of the difference in elective (ELCS) and emergency (EMCS) caesarean section (CS) rates between nulliparous women in public maternity hospitals in Ireland by model of care, and to quantify the contribution of maternal, clinical, and hospital characteristics in expla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brick, Aoife, Layte, Richard, Nolan, Anne, Turner, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1494-3
_version_ 1782441930474389504
author Brick, Aoife
Layte, Richard
Nolan, Anne
Turner, Michael J.
author_facet Brick, Aoife
Layte, Richard
Nolan, Anne
Turner, Michael J.
author_sort Brick, Aoife
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the extent of the difference in elective (ELCS) and emergency (EMCS) caesarean section (CS) rates between nulliparous women in public maternity hospitals in Ireland by model of care, and to quantify the contribution of maternal, clinical, and hospital characteristics in explaining the difference in the rates. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis using a combination of two routinely collected administrative databases was performed. A non-linear extension of the Oaxaca-Blinder method is used to decompose the difference between public and private ELCS and EMCS rates into the proportion explained by the differences in observable maternal, clinical, and hospital characteristics and the proportion that remains unexplained. RESULTS: Of the 29,870 babies delivered to nulliparous women, 7,792 were delivered via CS (26.1 %), 79.6 % of which were coded as EMCS. Higher prevalence of ELCS was associated with breech presentation, other malpresentation, and the mother being over 40 years old. Higher prevalence of EMCS was associated with placenta praevia or placental abruption, diabetes (pre-existing and gestational), and being over 40 years old. The private model of care is associated with ELCS and EMCS rates 6 percentage points higher compared than the public model of care but this differential is insignificant in the fully adjusted models for EMCS. Just over half (53 %) of the 6 percentage point difference in ELCS rates between the two models of care can be accounted for by maternal, clinical and hospital characteristics. Almost 80 % of the difference for EMCS can be accounted for. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the difference in EMCS rates across models of care can be explained by differing characteristics between the two groups of women. The main contributor to the difference was advancing maternal age. The unexplained component of the difference for ELCS is larger; an excess private effect remains after accounting for maternal, clinical, and hospital characteristics. This requires further investigation and may be mitigated in future with the introduction of clinical guidelines related to CS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1494-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49389422016-07-10 Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis Brick, Aoife Layte, Richard Nolan, Anne Turner, Michael J. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the extent of the difference in elective (ELCS) and emergency (EMCS) caesarean section (CS) rates between nulliparous women in public maternity hospitals in Ireland by model of care, and to quantify the contribution of maternal, clinical, and hospital characteristics in explaining the difference in the rates. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis using a combination of two routinely collected administrative databases was performed. A non-linear extension of the Oaxaca-Blinder method is used to decompose the difference between public and private ELCS and EMCS rates into the proportion explained by the differences in observable maternal, clinical, and hospital characteristics and the proportion that remains unexplained. RESULTS: Of the 29,870 babies delivered to nulliparous women, 7,792 were delivered via CS (26.1 %), 79.6 % of which were coded as EMCS. Higher prevalence of ELCS was associated with breech presentation, other malpresentation, and the mother being over 40 years old. Higher prevalence of EMCS was associated with placenta praevia or placental abruption, diabetes (pre-existing and gestational), and being over 40 years old. The private model of care is associated with ELCS and EMCS rates 6 percentage points higher compared than the public model of care but this differential is insignificant in the fully adjusted models for EMCS. Just over half (53 %) of the 6 percentage point difference in ELCS rates between the two models of care can be accounted for by maternal, clinical and hospital characteristics. Almost 80 % of the difference for EMCS can be accounted for. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the difference in EMCS rates across models of care can be explained by differing characteristics between the two groups of women. The main contributor to the difference was advancing maternal age. The unexplained component of the difference for ELCS is larger; an excess private effect remains after accounting for maternal, clinical, and hospital characteristics. This requires further investigation and may be mitigated in future with the introduction of clinical guidelines related to CS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1494-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938942/ /pubmed/27392410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1494-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brick, Aoife
Layte, Richard
Nolan, Anne
Turner, Michael J.
Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis
title Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis
title_full Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis
title_fullStr Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis
title_full_unstemmed Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis
title_short Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis
title_sort differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1494-3
work_keys_str_mv AT brickaoife differencesinnulliparouscaesareansectionratesacrossmodelsofcareadecompositionanalysis
AT layterichard differencesinnulliparouscaesareansectionratesacrossmodelsofcareadecompositionanalysis
AT nolananne differencesinnulliparouscaesareansectionratesacrossmodelsofcareadecompositionanalysis
AT turnermichaelj differencesinnulliparouscaesareansectionratesacrossmodelsofcareadecompositionanalysis