Cargando…

Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections

BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VAD) are valuable options for patients with heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation. We assessed the impact of pre-transplant VAD implantation on the incidence of post-transplant infections in a nationwide cohort of heart transplant recipients. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Héquet, Delphine, Kralidis, Georg, Carrel, Thierry, Cusini, Alexia, Garzoni, Christian, Hullin, Roger, Meylan, Pascal R., Mohacsi, Paul, Mueller, Nicolas J., Ruschitzka, Frank, Tozzi, Piergiorgio, van Delden, Christian, Weisser, Maja, Wilhelm, Markus J., Pascual, Manuel, Manuel, Oriol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0
_version_ 1782441936546693120
author Héquet, Delphine
Kralidis, Georg
Carrel, Thierry
Cusini, Alexia
Garzoni, Christian
Hullin, Roger
Meylan, Pascal R.
Mohacsi, Paul
Mueller, Nicolas J.
Ruschitzka, Frank
Tozzi, Piergiorgio
van Delden, Christian
Weisser, Maja
Wilhelm, Markus J.
Pascual, Manuel
Manuel, Oriol
author_facet Héquet, Delphine
Kralidis, Georg
Carrel, Thierry
Cusini, Alexia
Garzoni, Christian
Hullin, Roger
Meylan, Pascal R.
Mohacsi, Paul
Mueller, Nicolas J.
Ruschitzka, Frank
Tozzi, Piergiorgio
van Delden, Christian
Weisser, Maja
Wilhelm, Markus J.
Pascual, Manuel
Manuel, Oriol
author_sort Héquet, Delphine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VAD) are valuable options for patients with heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation. We assessed the impact of pre-transplant VAD implantation on the incidence of post-transplant infections in a nationwide cohort of heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Heart transplant recipients included in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study between May 2008 and December 2012 were analyzed. Cumulative incidence curves were used to calculate the incidence of bacterial or Candida infections (primary endpoint) and of other infections (secondary endpoint) after transplant. Cox regression models treating death as a competing risk were used to identify risk factors for the development of infection after transplant. RESULTS: Overall, 119 patients were included in the study, 35 with a VAD and 84 without VAD. Cumulative incidences of post-transplant bacterial or Candida infections were 37.7 % in VAD patients and 40.4 % in non-VAD patients. In multivariate analysis, the use of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis was the only variable associated with bacterial/Candida infections after transplant (HR 0.29 [95 % CI 0.15-0.57], p < 0.001), but presence of a VAD was not (HR 0.94, [95 % CI 0.38-2.32], p = 0.89, for continuous-flow devices, and HR 0.45 [0.15 – 1.34], p = 0.15, for other devices). Risk for post-transplant viral and all fungal infections was not increased in patients with VAD. One-year survival was 82.9 % (29/35) in the VAD group and 82.1 % (69/84) in the non-VAD group. All 6 patients in the VAD group that died after transplant had a history of pre-transplant VAD infection. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort of heart transplant recipients, the presence of VAD at the time of transplant had no influence on the development of post-transplant infections. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49389722016-07-18 Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections Héquet, Delphine Kralidis, Georg Carrel, Thierry Cusini, Alexia Garzoni, Christian Hullin, Roger Meylan, Pascal R. Mohacsi, Paul Mueller, Nicolas J. Ruschitzka, Frank Tozzi, Piergiorgio van Delden, Christian Weisser, Maja Wilhelm, Markus J. Pascual, Manuel Manuel, Oriol BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VAD) are valuable options for patients with heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation. We assessed the impact of pre-transplant VAD implantation on the incidence of post-transplant infections in a nationwide cohort of heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Heart transplant recipients included in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study between May 2008 and December 2012 were analyzed. Cumulative incidence curves were used to calculate the incidence of bacterial or Candida infections (primary endpoint) and of other infections (secondary endpoint) after transplant. Cox regression models treating death as a competing risk were used to identify risk factors for the development of infection after transplant. RESULTS: Overall, 119 patients were included in the study, 35 with a VAD and 84 without VAD. Cumulative incidences of post-transplant bacterial or Candida infections were 37.7 % in VAD patients and 40.4 % in non-VAD patients. In multivariate analysis, the use of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis was the only variable associated with bacterial/Candida infections after transplant (HR 0.29 [95 % CI 0.15-0.57], p < 0.001), but presence of a VAD was not (HR 0.94, [95 % CI 0.38-2.32], p = 0.89, for continuous-flow devices, and HR 0.45 [0.15 – 1.34], p = 0.15, for other devices). Risk for post-transplant viral and all fungal infections was not increased in patients with VAD. One-year survival was 82.9 % (29/35) in the VAD group and 82.1 % (69/84) in the non-VAD group. All 6 patients in the VAD group that died after transplant had a history of pre-transplant VAD infection. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort of heart transplant recipients, the presence of VAD at the time of transplant had no influence on the development of post-transplant infections. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938972/ /pubmed/27391967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Héquet, Delphine
Kralidis, Georg
Carrel, Thierry
Cusini, Alexia
Garzoni, Christian
Hullin, Roger
Meylan, Pascal R.
Mohacsi, Paul
Mueller, Nicolas J.
Ruschitzka, Frank
Tozzi, Piergiorgio
van Delden, Christian
Weisser, Maja
Wilhelm, Markus J.
Pascual, Manuel
Manuel, Oriol
Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections
title Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections
title_full Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections
title_fullStr Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections
title_full_unstemmed Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections
title_short Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections
title_sort ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hequetdelphine ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT kralidisgeorg ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT carrelthierry ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT cusinialexia ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT garzonichristian ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT hullinroger ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT meylanpascalr ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT mohacsipaul ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT muellernicolasj ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT ruschitzkafrank ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT tozzipiergiorgio ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT vandeldenchristian ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT weissermaja ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT wilhelmmarkusj ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT pascualmanuel ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT manueloriol ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections
AT ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections