Cargando…
Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections
BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VAD) are valuable options for patients with heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation. We assessed the impact of pre-transplant VAD implantation on the incidence of post-transplant infections in a nationwide cohort of heart transplant recipients. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0 |
_version_ | 1782441936546693120 |
---|---|
author | Héquet, Delphine Kralidis, Georg Carrel, Thierry Cusini, Alexia Garzoni, Christian Hullin, Roger Meylan, Pascal R. Mohacsi, Paul Mueller, Nicolas J. Ruschitzka, Frank Tozzi, Piergiorgio van Delden, Christian Weisser, Maja Wilhelm, Markus J. Pascual, Manuel Manuel, Oriol |
author_facet | Héquet, Delphine Kralidis, Georg Carrel, Thierry Cusini, Alexia Garzoni, Christian Hullin, Roger Meylan, Pascal R. Mohacsi, Paul Mueller, Nicolas J. Ruschitzka, Frank Tozzi, Piergiorgio van Delden, Christian Weisser, Maja Wilhelm, Markus J. Pascual, Manuel Manuel, Oriol |
author_sort | Héquet, Delphine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VAD) are valuable options for patients with heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation. We assessed the impact of pre-transplant VAD implantation on the incidence of post-transplant infections in a nationwide cohort of heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Heart transplant recipients included in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study between May 2008 and December 2012 were analyzed. Cumulative incidence curves were used to calculate the incidence of bacterial or Candida infections (primary endpoint) and of other infections (secondary endpoint) after transplant. Cox regression models treating death as a competing risk were used to identify risk factors for the development of infection after transplant. RESULTS: Overall, 119 patients were included in the study, 35 with a VAD and 84 without VAD. Cumulative incidences of post-transplant bacterial or Candida infections were 37.7 % in VAD patients and 40.4 % in non-VAD patients. In multivariate analysis, the use of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis was the only variable associated with bacterial/Candida infections after transplant (HR 0.29 [95 % CI 0.15-0.57], p < 0.001), but presence of a VAD was not (HR 0.94, [95 % CI 0.38-2.32], p = 0.89, for continuous-flow devices, and HR 0.45 [0.15 – 1.34], p = 0.15, for other devices). Risk for post-transplant viral and all fungal infections was not increased in patients with VAD. One-year survival was 82.9 % (29/35) in the VAD group and 82.1 % (69/84) in the non-VAD group. All 6 patients in the VAD group that died after transplant had a history of pre-transplant VAD infection. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort of heart transplant recipients, the presence of VAD at the time of transplant had no influence on the development of post-transplant infections. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4938972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49389722016-07-18 Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections Héquet, Delphine Kralidis, Georg Carrel, Thierry Cusini, Alexia Garzoni, Christian Hullin, Roger Meylan, Pascal R. Mohacsi, Paul Mueller, Nicolas J. Ruschitzka, Frank Tozzi, Piergiorgio van Delden, Christian Weisser, Maja Wilhelm, Markus J. Pascual, Manuel Manuel, Oriol BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VAD) are valuable options for patients with heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation. We assessed the impact of pre-transplant VAD implantation on the incidence of post-transplant infections in a nationwide cohort of heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Heart transplant recipients included in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study between May 2008 and December 2012 were analyzed. Cumulative incidence curves were used to calculate the incidence of bacterial or Candida infections (primary endpoint) and of other infections (secondary endpoint) after transplant. Cox regression models treating death as a competing risk were used to identify risk factors for the development of infection after transplant. RESULTS: Overall, 119 patients were included in the study, 35 with a VAD and 84 without VAD. Cumulative incidences of post-transplant bacterial or Candida infections were 37.7 % in VAD patients and 40.4 % in non-VAD patients. In multivariate analysis, the use of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis was the only variable associated with bacterial/Candida infections after transplant (HR 0.29 [95 % CI 0.15-0.57], p < 0.001), but presence of a VAD was not (HR 0.94, [95 % CI 0.38-2.32], p = 0.89, for continuous-flow devices, and HR 0.45 [0.15 – 1.34], p = 0.15, for other devices). Risk for post-transplant viral and all fungal infections was not increased in patients with VAD. One-year survival was 82.9 % (29/35) in the VAD group and 82.1 % (69/84) in the non-VAD group. All 6 patients in the VAD group that died after transplant had a history of pre-transplant VAD infection. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort of heart transplant recipients, the presence of VAD at the time of transplant had no influence on the development of post-transplant infections. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938972/ /pubmed/27391967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Héquet, Delphine Kralidis, Georg Carrel, Thierry Cusini, Alexia Garzoni, Christian Hullin, Roger Meylan, Pascal R. Mohacsi, Paul Mueller, Nicolas J. Ruschitzka, Frank Tozzi, Piergiorgio van Delden, Christian Weisser, Maja Wilhelm, Markus J. Pascual, Manuel Manuel, Oriol Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections |
title | Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections |
title_full | Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections |
title_fullStr | Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections |
title_full_unstemmed | Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections |
title_short | Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections |
title_sort | ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hequetdelphine ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT kralidisgeorg ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT carrelthierry ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT cusinialexia ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT garzonichristian ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT hullinroger ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT meylanpascalr ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT mohacsipaul ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT muellernicolasj ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT ruschitzkafrank ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT tozzipiergiorgio ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT vandeldenchristian ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT weissermaja ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT wilhelmmarkusj ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT pascualmanuel ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT manueloriol ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections AT ventricularassistdevicesasbridgetohearttransplantationimpactonposttransplantinfections |