Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss

BACKGROUND: Presbycusis has a direct influence on autonomy of the elderly but hearing aids lack of affordability. Moreover a recent review demonstrate that electroacoustic characteristics of OTC hearing aids were generally not suitable for the elderly people. In our study, we assessed the clinical v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sacco, Guillaume, Gonfrier, Sébastien, Teboul, Bernard, Gahide, Ivan, Prate, Fredéric, Demory-Zory, Mathilde, Turpin, Jean-Michel, Vuagnoux, Claire, Genovese, Philippe, Schneider, Stéphane, Guérin, Olivier, Guevara, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0304-4
_version_ 1782441937910890496
author Sacco, Guillaume
Gonfrier, Sébastien
Teboul, Bernard
Gahide, Ivan
Prate, Fredéric
Demory-Zory, Mathilde
Turpin, Jean-Michel
Vuagnoux, Claire
Genovese, Philippe
Schneider, Stéphane
Guérin, Olivier
Guevara, Nicolas
author_facet Sacco, Guillaume
Gonfrier, Sébastien
Teboul, Bernard
Gahide, Ivan
Prate, Fredéric
Demory-Zory, Mathilde
Turpin, Jean-Michel
Vuagnoux, Claire
Genovese, Philippe
Schneider, Stéphane
Guérin, Olivier
Guevara, Nicolas
author_sort Sacco, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Presbycusis has a direct influence on autonomy of the elderly but hearing aids lack of affordability. Moreover a recent review demonstrate that electroacoustic characteristics of OTC hearing aids were generally not suitable for the elderly people. In our study, we assessed the clinical value of a new over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid device (TEO First®) in the elderly. METHOD: This prospective monocentric open label study included patients over 60 years of age with a mild to moderate presbycusis. Patients were assessed with acceptable noise level test (ANL), pure tone (PTA) and speech (SA) audiometry in silent and noisy environment, with and without TEO First®. A Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile, acceptability and satisfaction surveys were completed after one month of using the device. RESULTS: Thirty one patients were included. There was an improvement of hearing with TEO First® in silence (SA: +39.2 %, p < 0.01; PTA: -9.04 dB, p < 0.01) or in noise (SA +47.7 %, p < 0.01; PTA: -5.23 dB, p < 0.05). After one month of use of the device, quality of life has improved with regards to the following parameters: decrease of perceived hearing difficulties during conversation without background noise (-9.6 % p = 0.018), in conversation with several people (-16.2 % p = 0.0076), decrease of negative emotions while watching TV (-18.5 % p = 0.011), during conversation without background noise (-16.5 % p = 0.0024), during conversation in noisy background (-17.1 % p = 0.027) and during conversation with several people (-20 % p = 0.014). The acceptability of the device was low to moderate. CONCLUSION: TEO First® is an effective OTC hearing aid that improves the patient’s quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT01815788
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49389782016-07-10 Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss Sacco, Guillaume Gonfrier, Sébastien Teboul, Bernard Gahide, Ivan Prate, Fredéric Demory-Zory, Mathilde Turpin, Jean-Michel Vuagnoux, Claire Genovese, Philippe Schneider, Stéphane Guérin, Olivier Guevara, Nicolas BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Presbycusis has a direct influence on autonomy of the elderly but hearing aids lack of affordability. Moreover a recent review demonstrate that electroacoustic characteristics of OTC hearing aids were generally not suitable for the elderly people. In our study, we assessed the clinical value of a new over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid device (TEO First®) in the elderly. METHOD: This prospective monocentric open label study included patients over 60 years of age with a mild to moderate presbycusis. Patients were assessed with acceptable noise level test (ANL), pure tone (PTA) and speech (SA) audiometry in silent and noisy environment, with and without TEO First®. A Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile, acceptability and satisfaction surveys were completed after one month of using the device. RESULTS: Thirty one patients were included. There was an improvement of hearing with TEO First® in silence (SA: +39.2 %, p < 0.01; PTA: -9.04 dB, p < 0.01) or in noise (SA +47.7 %, p < 0.01; PTA: -5.23 dB, p < 0.05). After one month of use of the device, quality of life has improved with regards to the following parameters: decrease of perceived hearing difficulties during conversation without background noise (-9.6 % p = 0.018), in conversation with several people (-16.2 % p = 0.0076), decrease of negative emotions while watching TV (-18.5 % p = 0.011), during conversation without background noise (-16.5 % p = 0.0024), during conversation in noisy background (-17.1 % p = 0.027) and during conversation with several people (-20 % p = 0.014). The acceptability of the device was low to moderate. CONCLUSION: TEO First® is an effective OTC hearing aid that improves the patient’s quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT01815788 BioMed Central 2016-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4938978/ /pubmed/27392722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0304-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sacco, Guillaume
Gonfrier, Sébastien
Teboul, Bernard
Gahide, Ivan
Prate, Fredéric
Demory-Zory, Mathilde
Turpin, Jean-Michel
Vuagnoux, Claire
Genovese, Philippe
Schneider, Stéphane
Guérin, Olivier
Guevara, Nicolas
Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss
title Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss
title_full Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss
title_short Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss
title_sort clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (teo first®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0304-4
work_keys_str_mv AT saccoguillaume clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT gonfriersebastien clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT teboulbernard clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT gahideivan clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT pratefrederic clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT demoryzorymathilde clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT turpinjeanmichel clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT vuagnouxclaire clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT genovesephilippe clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT schneiderstephane clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT guerinolivier clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss
AT guevaranicolas clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss