Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss
BACKGROUND: Presbycusis has a direct influence on autonomy of the elderly but hearing aids lack of affordability. Moreover a recent review demonstrate that electroacoustic characteristics of OTC hearing aids were generally not suitable for the elderly people. In our study, we assessed the clinical v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0304-4 |
_version_ | 1782441937910890496 |
---|---|
author | Sacco, Guillaume Gonfrier, Sébastien Teboul, Bernard Gahide, Ivan Prate, Fredéric Demory-Zory, Mathilde Turpin, Jean-Michel Vuagnoux, Claire Genovese, Philippe Schneider, Stéphane Guérin, Olivier Guevara, Nicolas |
author_facet | Sacco, Guillaume Gonfrier, Sébastien Teboul, Bernard Gahide, Ivan Prate, Fredéric Demory-Zory, Mathilde Turpin, Jean-Michel Vuagnoux, Claire Genovese, Philippe Schneider, Stéphane Guérin, Olivier Guevara, Nicolas |
author_sort | Sacco, Guillaume |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Presbycusis has a direct influence on autonomy of the elderly but hearing aids lack of affordability. Moreover a recent review demonstrate that electroacoustic characteristics of OTC hearing aids were generally not suitable for the elderly people. In our study, we assessed the clinical value of a new over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid device (TEO First®) in the elderly. METHOD: This prospective monocentric open label study included patients over 60 years of age with a mild to moderate presbycusis. Patients were assessed with acceptable noise level test (ANL), pure tone (PTA) and speech (SA) audiometry in silent and noisy environment, with and without TEO First®. A Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile, acceptability and satisfaction surveys were completed after one month of using the device. RESULTS: Thirty one patients were included. There was an improvement of hearing with TEO First® in silence (SA: +39.2 %, p < 0.01; PTA: -9.04 dB, p < 0.01) or in noise (SA +47.7 %, p < 0.01; PTA: -5.23 dB, p < 0.05). After one month of use of the device, quality of life has improved with regards to the following parameters: decrease of perceived hearing difficulties during conversation without background noise (-9.6 % p = 0.018), in conversation with several people (-16.2 % p = 0.0076), decrease of negative emotions while watching TV (-18.5 % p = 0.011), during conversation without background noise (-16.5 % p = 0.0024), during conversation in noisy background (-17.1 % p = 0.027) and during conversation with several people (-20 % p = 0.014). The acceptability of the device was low to moderate. CONCLUSION: TEO First® is an effective OTC hearing aid that improves the patient’s quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT01815788 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4938978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49389782016-07-10 Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss Sacco, Guillaume Gonfrier, Sébastien Teboul, Bernard Gahide, Ivan Prate, Fredéric Demory-Zory, Mathilde Turpin, Jean-Michel Vuagnoux, Claire Genovese, Philippe Schneider, Stéphane Guérin, Olivier Guevara, Nicolas BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Presbycusis has a direct influence on autonomy of the elderly but hearing aids lack of affordability. Moreover a recent review demonstrate that electroacoustic characteristics of OTC hearing aids were generally not suitable for the elderly people. In our study, we assessed the clinical value of a new over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid device (TEO First®) in the elderly. METHOD: This prospective monocentric open label study included patients over 60 years of age with a mild to moderate presbycusis. Patients were assessed with acceptable noise level test (ANL), pure tone (PTA) and speech (SA) audiometry in silent and noisy environment, with and without TEO First®. A Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile, acceptability and satisfaction surveys were completed after one month of using the device. RESULTS: Thirty one patients were included. There was an improvement of hearing with TEO First® in silence (SA: +39.2 %, p < 0.01; PTA: -9.04 dB, p < 0.01) or in noise (SA +47.7 %, p < 0.01; PTA: -5.23 dB, p < 0.05). After one month of use of the device, quality of life has improved with regards to the following parameters: decrease of perceived hearing difficulties during conversation without background noise (-9.6 % p = 0.018), in conversation with several people (-16.2 % p = 0.0076), decrease of negative emotions while watching TV (-18.5 % p = 0.011), during conversation without background noise (-16.5 % p = 0.0024), during conversation in noisy background (-17.1 % p = 0.027) and during conversation with several people (-20 % p = 0.014). The acceptability of the device was low to moderate. CONCLUSION: TEO First® is an effective OTC hearing aid that improves the patient’s quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials NCT01815788 BioMed Central 2016-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4938978/ /pubmed/27392722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0304-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sacco, Guillaume Gonfrier, Sébastien Teboul, Bernard Gahide, Ivan Prate, Fredéric Demory-Zory, Mathilde Turpin, Jean-Michel Vuagnoux, Claire Genovese, Philippe Schneider, Stéphane Guérin, Olivier Guevara, Nicolas Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss |
title | Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (teo first®) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0304-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saccoguillaume clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT gonfriersebastien clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT teboulbernard clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT gahideivan clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT pratefrederic clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT demoryzorymathilde clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT turpinjeanmichel clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT vuagnouxclaire clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT genovesephilippe clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT schneiderstephane clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT guerinolivier clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss AT guevaranicolas clinicalevaluationofanoverthecounterhearingaidteofirstinelderlypatientssufferingofmildtomoderatehearingloss |