Cargando…

Interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND: Foot surgery is common in RA but the current lack of understanding of how patients interpret outcomes inhibits evaluation of procedures in clinical and research settings. This study aimed to explore which factors are important to people with RA when they evaluate the outcome of foot and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Backhouse, Michael R., Vinall-Collier, Karen A., Redmond, Anthony C., Helliwell, Philip S., Keenan, Anne-Maree
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0153-6
_version_ 1782441942325395456
author Backhouse, Michael R.
Vinall-Collier, Karen A.
Redmond, Anthony C.
Helliwell, Philip S.
Keenan, Anne-Maree
author_facet Backhouse, Michael R.
Vinall-Collier, Karen A.
Redmond, Anthony C.
Helliwell, Philip S.
Keenan, Anne-Maree
author_sort Backhouse, Michael R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Foot surgery is common in RA but the current lack of understanding of how patients interpret outcomes inhibits evaluation of procedures in clinical and research settings. This study aimed to explore which factors are important to people with RA when they evaluate the outcome of foot and ankle surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Semi structured interviews with 11 RA participants who had mixed experiences of foot surgery were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. Responses showed that while participants interpreted surgical outcome in respect to a multitude of factors, five major themes emerged: functional ability, participation, appearance of feet and footwear, surgeons’ opinion, and pain. Participants interpreted levels of physical function in light of other aspects of their disease, reflecting on relative change from their preoperative state more than absolute levels of ability. Appearance was important to almost all participants: physical appearance, foot shape, and footwear were closely interlinked, yet participants saw these as distinct concepts and frequently entered into a defensive repertoire, feeling the need to justify that their perception of outcome was not about cosmesis. Surgeons’ post-operative evaluation of the procedure was highly influential and made a lasting impression, irrespective of how the outcome compared to the participants’ initial goals. Whilst pain was important to almost all participants, it had the greatest impact upon them when it interfered with their ability to undertake valued activities. CONCLUSIONS: People with RA interpret the outcome of foot surgery using multiple interrelated factors, particularly functional ability, appearance and surgeons’ appraisal of the procedure. While pain was often noted, this appeared less important than anticipated. These factors can help clinicians in discussing surgical options in patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-016-0153-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4938997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49389972016-07-10 Interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis Backhouse, Michael R. Vinall-Collier, Karen A. Redmond, Anthony C. Helliwell, Philip S. Keenan, Anne-Maree J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Foot surgery is common in RA but the current lack of understanding of how patients interpret outcomes inhibits evaluation of procedures in clinical and research settings. This study aimed to explore which factors are important to people with RA when they evaluate the outcome of foot and ankle surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Semi structured interviews with 11 RA participants who had mixed experiences of foot surgery were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. Responses showed that while participants interpreted surgical outcome in respect to a multitude of factors, five major themes emerged: functional ability, participation, appearance of feet and footwear, surgeons’ opinion, and pain. Participants interpreted levels of physical function in light of other aspects of their disease, reflecting on relative change from their preoperative state more than absolute levels of ability. Appearance was important to almost all participants: physical appearance, foot shape, and footwear were closely interlinked, yet participants saw these as distinct concepts and frequently entered into a defensive repertoire, feeling the need to justify that their perception of outcome was not about cosmesis. Surgeons’ post-operative evaluation of the procedure was highly influential and made a lasting impression, irrespective of how the outcome compared to the participants’ initial goals. Whilst pain was important to almost all participants, it had the greatest impact upon them when it interfered with their ability to undertake valued activities. CONCLUSIONS: People with RA interpret the outcome of foot surgery using multiple interrelated factors, particularly functional ability, appearance and surgeons’ appraisal of the procedure. While pain was often noted, this appeared less important than anticipated. These factors can help clinicians in discussing surgical options in patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-016-0153-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4938997/ /pubmed/27398097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0153-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Backhouse, Michael R.
Vinall-Collier, Karen A.
Redmond, Anthony C.
Helliwell, Philip S.
Keenan, Anne-Maree
Interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title Interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0153-6
work_keys_str_mv AT backhousemichaelr interpretingoutcomefollowingfootsurgeryinpeoplewithrheumatoidarthritis
AT vinallcollierkarena interpretingoutcomefollowingfootsurgeryinpeoplewithrheumatoidarthritis
AT redmondanthonyc interpretingoutcomefollowingfootsurgeryinpeoplewithrheumatoidarthritis
AT helliwellphilips interpretingoutcomefollowingfootsurgeryinpeoplewithrheumatoidarthritis
AT keenanannemaree interpretingoutcomefollowingfootsurgeryinpeoplewithrheumatoidarthritis