Cargando…
Affirming the Value of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 for Nursing Home Decision-Making and Quality Improvement
Background: We examined the agreement over time of the physical functioning domains of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (RAI-MDS) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in nursing home residents with dementia. Methods: We completed a secondary analysis of data...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4939556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27417788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare3030659 |
_version_ | 1782442023511392256 |
---|---|
author | Drummond, Lindsay S. Slaughter, Susan E. Jones, C. Allyson Wagg, Adrian S. Batchelor-Murphy, Melissa |
author_facet | Drummond, Lindsay S. Slaughter, Susan E. Jones, C. Allyson Wagg, Adrian S. Batchelor-Murphy, Melissa |
author_sort | Drummond, Lindsay S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: We examined the agreement over time of the physical functioning domains of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (RAI-MDS) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in nursing home residents with dementia. Methods: We completed a secondary analysis of data from a longitudinal quasi-experimental study of residents who could transfer independently or with the assistance of one person. FIM assessments were completed at up to three time points by researchers using interviews. RAI-MDS assessments, completed by nursing home staff, were matched to the FIM assessment by nearest time. FIM and RAI-MDS assessments were correlated based on time between assessments using Pearson’s correlation. Items for activities of daily living (ADL) from the RAI-MDS were rescaled using two previously published crosswalks. Motor and ADL subscales were also used, containing eight and six items, respectively. Results: A total of 362 paired interviews and assessments were collected from 130 residents. The mean scores and standard deviations were as follows: FIM: 19.64 (7.60); William’s RAI-MDS crosswalk: 18.04 (5.25); and Velozo’s RAI-MDS crosswalk: 18.09 (6.50). Using both crosswalks, most items showed medium (r > 0.3) or large (r > 0.5) correlations, even at greater than 41 days between assessments. Subscales showed large correlations for all time intervals for both crosswalks. Conclusions: The RAI-MDS remains stable when data are collected greater than 41 days from the FIM assessment. These findings should add confidence in the RAI-MDS data and its clinical utility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4939556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49395562016-07-12 Affirming the Value of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 for Nursing Home Decision-Making and Quality Improvement Drummond, Lindsay S. Slaughter, Susan E. Jones, C. Allyson Wagg, Adrian S. Batchelor-Murphy, Melissa Healthcare (Basel) Article Background: We examined the agreement over time of the physical functioning domains of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (RAI-MDS) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in nursing home residents with dementia. Methods: We completed a secondary analysis of data from a longitudinal quasi-experimental study of residents who could transfer independently or with the assistance of one person. FIM assessments were completed at up to three time points by researchers using interviews. RAI-MDS assessments, completed by nursing home staff, were matched to the FIM assessment by nearest time. FIM and RAI-MDS assessments were correlated based on time between assessments using Pearson’s correlation. Items for activities of daily living (ADL) from the RAI-MDS were rescaled using two previously published crosswalks. Motor and ADL subscales were also used, containing eight and six items, respectively. Results: A total of 362 paired interviews and assessments were collected from 130 residents. The mean scores and standard deviations were as follows: FIM: 19.64 (7.60); William’s RAI-MDS crosswalk: 18.04 (5.25); and Velozo’s RAI-MDS crosswalk: 18.09 (6.50). Using both crosswalks, most items showed medium (r > 0.3) or large (r > 0.5) correlations, even at greater than 41 days between assessments. Subscales showed large correlations for all time intervals for both crosswalks. Conclusions: The RAI-MDS remains stable when data are collected greater than 41 days from the FIM assessment. These findings should add confidence in the RAI-MDS data and its clinical utility. MDPI 2015-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4939556/ /pubmed/27417788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare3030659 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Drummond, Lindsay S. Slaughter, Susan E. Jones, C. Allyson Wagg, Adrian S. Batchelor-Murphy, Melissa Affirming the Value of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 for Nursing Home Decision-Making and Quality Improvement |
title | Affirming the Value of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 for Nursing Home Decision-Making and Quality Improvement |
title_full | Affirming the Value of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 for Nursing Home Decision-Making and Quality Improvement |
title_fullStr | Affirming the Value of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 for Nursing Home Decision-Making and Quality Improvement |
title_full_unstemmed | Affirming the Value of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 for Nursing Home Decision-Making and Quality Improvement |
title_short | Affirming the Value of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 for Nursing Home Decision-Making and Quality Improvement |
title_sort | affirming the value of the resident assessment instrument: minimum data set version 2.0 for nursing home decision-making and quality improvement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4939556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27417788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare3030659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drummondlindsays affirmingthevalueoftheresidentassessmentinstrumentminimumdatasetversion20fornursinghomedecisionmakingandqualityimprovement AT slaughtersusane affirmingthevalueoftheresidentassessmentinstrumentminimumdatasetversion20fornursinghomedecisionmakingandqualityimprovement AT jonescallyson affirmingthevalueoftheresidentassessmentinstrumentminimumdatasetversion20fornursinghomedecisionmakingandqualityimprovement AT waggadrians affirmingthevalueoftheresidentassessmentinstrumentminimumdatasetversion20fornursinghomedecisionmakingandqualityimprovement AT batchelormurphymelissa affirmingthevalueoftheresidentassessmentinstrumentminimumdatasetversion20fornursinghomedecisionmakingandqualityimprovement |