Cargando…

Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies

OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence on the average bias and heterogeneity associated with reported methodological features of randomized trials. DESIGN: Systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies. METHODS: We retrieved eligible studies included in a recent AHRQ-EPC review on this topic (latest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Page, Matthew J., Higgins, Julian P. T., Clayton, Gemma, Sterne, Jonathan A. C., Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn, Savović, Jelena
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4939945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159267

Ejemplares similares

A new large-scale meta-epidemiological study on bias in randomized trials using routinely collected risk-of-bias assessments by cochrane reviewers: results from the robes study
por: Savovic, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study
por: Moustgaard, Helene, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study
por: Savović, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Development of a method for adjusting trial results for biases in meta-analysis
por: Turner, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
por: Savović, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Adjusting trial results for biases in meta‐analysis: combining data‐based evidence on bias with detailed trial assessment
por: Rhodes, K. M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Empirical evidence of study design biases in nutrition randomised controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Stadelmaier, Julia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Agreement was moderate between data-based and opinion-based assessments of biases affecting randomized trials within meta-analyses
por: Turner, Rebecca M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis
por: Naci, Huseyin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Mechanisms and direction of allocation bias in randomised clinical trials
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
por: Sterne, Jonathan AC, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics
por: Rhodes, Kirsty M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Empirical evidence about inconsistency among studies in a pair‐wise meta‐analysis
por: Rhodes, Kirsty M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Use of external evidence for design and Bayesian analysis of clinical trials: a qualitative study of trialists’ views
por: Clayton, Gemma L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain
por: Olsen, Mette Frahm, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study
por: Page, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
por: Whiting, Penny, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study
por: Tendal, Britta, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

A novel approach to understanding outcome selection and reporting during the evaluation of innovative surgery from first in human to pragmatic RCT: an evolution review
por: Howes, Noah, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Lack of Evidence for Ribavirin Treatment of Lassa Fever in Systematic Review of Published and Unpublished Studies
por: Cheng, Hung-Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Rethinking the assessment of risk of bias due to selective reporting: a cross-sectional study
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Label‐invariant models for the analysis of meta‐epidemiological data
por: Rhodes, K.M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Empirical evidence of the impact of study characteristics on the performance of prediction models: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
por: Page, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention
por: Krogsbøll, Lasse Theis, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Multiplicity of data in trial reports and the reliability of meta-analyses: empirical study
por: Tendal, Britta, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis
por: Chiocchia, Virginia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Local Literature Bias in Genetic Epidemiology: An Empirical Evaluation of the Chinese Literature
por: Pan, Zhenglun, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Empirical comparisons of meta-analysis methods for diagnostic studies: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Rosenberger, Kristine J, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Conflict of Interest Policies at Medical Schools and Teaching Hospitals: A Systematic Review of Cross-sectional Studies
por: Fabbri, Alice, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Empirical evidence of recall bias for primary health care visits
por: Brusco, Natasha Kareem, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Conflicts of Interest at Medical Journals: The Influence of Industry-Supported Randomised Trials on Journal Impact Factors and Revenue – Cohort Study
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Coding of adverse events of suicidality in clinical study reports of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: descriptive study
por: Maund, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Correction: Conflicts of Interest at Medical Journals: The Influence of Industry-Supported Randomised Trials on Journal Impact Factors and Revenue – Cohort Study
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_6bck11ddeu6qo166m99en5h770