Cargando…

Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal

Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adam, Asrul, Ibrahim, Zuwairie, Mokhtar, Norrima, Shapiai, Mohd Ibrahim, Cumming, Paul, Mubin, Marizan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27462484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0
_version_ 1782442123308564480
author Adam, Asrul
Ibrahim, Zuwairie
Mokhtar, Norrima
Shapiai, Mohd Ibrahim
Cumming, Paul
Mubin, Marizan
author_facet Adam, Asrul
Ibrahim, Zuwairie
Mokhtar, Norrima
Shapiai, Mohd Ibrahim
Cumming, Paul
Mubin, Marizan
author_sort Adam, Asrul
collection PubMed
description Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by Dumpala, Acir, Liu, and Dingle are routinely used to detect peaks in EEG signals acquired in clinical studies of epilepsy or eye blink. The optimal peak model is the most reliable peak detection performance in a particular application. A fair measure of performance of different models requires a common and unbiased platform. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the four different peak models using the extreme learning machine (ELM)-based peak detection algorithm. We found that the Dingle model gave the best performance, with 72 % accuracy in the analysis of real EEG data. Statistical analysis conferred that the Dingle model afforded significantly better mean testing accuracy than did the Acir and Liu models, which were in the range 37–52 %. Meanwhile, the Dingle model has no significant difference compared to Dumpala model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4940316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49403162016-07-26 Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal Adam, Asrul Ibrahim, Zuwairie Mokhtar, Norrima Shapiai, Mohd Ibrahim Cumming, Paul Mubin, Marizan Springerplus Research Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by Dumpala, Acir, Liu, and Dingle are routinely used to detect peaks in EEG signals acquired in clinical studies of epilepsy or eye blink. The optimal peak model is the most reliable peak detection performance in a particular application. A fair measure of performance of different models requires a common and unbiased platform. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the four different peak models using the extreme learning machine (ELM)-based peak detection algorithm. We found that the Dingle model gave the best performance, with 72 % accuracy in the analysis of real EEG data. Statistical analysis conferred that the Dingle model afforded significantly better mean testing accuracy than did the Acir and Liu models, which were in the range 37–52 %. Meanwhile, the Dingle model has no significant difference compared to Dumpala model. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4940316/ /pubmed/27462484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Adam, Asrul
Ibrahim, Zuwairie
Mokhtar, Norrima
Shapiai, Mohd Ibrahim
Cumming, Paul
Mubin, Marizan
Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title_full Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title_fullStr Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title_short Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title_sort evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for eeg signal
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27462484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0
work_keys_str_mv AT adamasrul evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal
AT ibrahimzuwairie evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal
AT mokhtarnorrima evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal
AT shapiaimohdibrahim evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal
AT cummingpaul evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal
AT mubinmarizan evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal