Cargando…
Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by D...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27462484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0 |
_version_ | 1782442123308564480 |
---|---|
author | Adam, Asrul Ibrahim, Zuwairie Mokhtar, Norrima Shapiai, Mohd Ibrahim Cumming, Paul Mubin, Marizan |
author_facet | Adam, Asrul Ibrahim, Zuwairie Mokhtar, Norrima Shapiai, Mohd Ibrahim Cumming, Paul Mubin, Marizan |
author_sort | Adam, Asrul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by Dumpala, Acir, Liu, and Dingle are routinely used to detect peaks in EEG signals acquired in clinical studies of epilepsy or eye blink. The optimal peak model is the most reliable peak detection performance in a particular application. A fair measure of performance of different models requires a common and unbiased platform. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the four different peak models using the extreme learning machine (ELM)-based peak detection algorithm. We found that the Dingle model gave the best performance, with 72 % accuracy in the analysis of real EEG data. Statistical analysis conferred that the Dingle model afforded significantly better mean testing accuracy than did the Acir and Liu models, which were in the range 37–52 %. Meanwhile, the Dingle model has no significant difference compared to Dumpala model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4940316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49403162016-07-26 Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal Adam, Asrul Ibrahim, Zuwairie Mokhtar, Norrima Shapiai, Mohd Ibrahim Cumming, Paul Mubin, Marizan Springerplus Research Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by Dumpala, Acir, Liu, and Dingle are routinely used to detect peaks in EEG signals acquired in clinical studies of epilepsy or eye blink. The optimal peak model is the most reliable peak detection performance in a particular application. A fair measure of performance of different models requires a common and unbiased platform. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the four different peak models using the extreme learning machine (ELM)-based peak detection algorithm. We found that the Dingle model gave the best performance, with 72 % accuracy in the analysis of real EEG data. Statistical analysis conferred that the Dingle model afforded significantly better mean testing accuracy than did the Acir and Liu models, which were in the range 37–52 %. Meanwhile, the Dingle model has no significant difference compared to Dumpala model. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4940316/ /pubmed/27462484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Adam, Asrul Ibrahim, Zuwairie Mokhtar, Norrima Shapiai, Mohd Ibrahim Cumming, Paul Mubin, Marizan Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
title | Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
title_full | Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
title_short | Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
title_sort | evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for eeg signal |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27462484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamasrul evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal AT ibrahimzuwairie evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal AT mokhtarnorrima evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal AT shapiaimohdibrahim evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal AT cummingpaul evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal AT mubinmarizan evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal |