Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes

Background. Minimally invasive spinal transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) at L5-S1 is technically more demanding than it is at other levels because of the anatomical and biomechanical traits. Objective. To determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIS-TLIF for treatment of si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Won-Suh, Kim, Jin-Sung, Ryu, Kyeong-Sik, Hur, Jung-Woo, Seong, Ji-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2518394
_version_ 1782442158038450176
author Choi, Won-Suh
Kim, Jin-Sung
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
Hur, Jung-Woo
Seong, Ji-Hoon
author_facet Choi, Won-Suh
Kim, Jin-Sung
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
Hur, Jung-Woo
Seong, Ji-Hoon
author_sort Choi, Won-Suh
collection PubMed
description Background. Minimally invasive spinal transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) at L5-S1 is technically more demanding than it is at other levels because of the anatomical and biomechanical traits. Objective. To determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIS-TLIF for treatment of single-level spinal stenosis low-grade isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1. Methods. Radiological data and electronic medical records of patients who underwent MIS-TLIF between May 2012 and December 2014 were reviewed. Fusion rate, cage position, disc height (DH), disc angle (DA), disc slope angle, segmental lordotic angle (SLA), lumbar lordotic angle (LLA), and pelvic parameters were assessed. For functional assessment, the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and patient satisfaction rate (PSR) were utilized. Results. A total of 21 levels in 21 patients were studied. DH, DA, SLA, and LLA had increased from their preoperative measures at the final follow-up. Fusion rate was 86.7% (18/21) at 12 months' follow-up. The most common cage position was anteromedial (15/21). The mean VAS scores for back and leg pain mean ODI scores improved significantly at the final follow-up. PSR was 88%. Cage subsidence was observed in 33.3% (7/21). Conclusions. The clinical and radiologic outcomes after MIS-TLIF at L5-S1 in patients with spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis are generally favorable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4940521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49405212016-07-18 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes Choi, Won-Suh Kim, Jin-Sung Ryu, Kyeong-Sik Hur, Jung-Woo Seong, Ji-Hoon Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Background. Minimally invasive spinal transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) at L5-S1 is technically more demanding than it is at other levels because of the anatomical and biomechanical traits. Objective. To determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIS-TLIF for treatment of single-level spinal stenosis low-grade isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1. Methods. Radiological data and electronic medical records of patients who underwent MIS-TLIF between May 2012 and December 2014 were reviewed. Fusion rate, cage position, disc height (DH), disc angle (DA), disc slope angle, segmental lordotic angle (SLA), lumbar lordotic angle (LLA), and pelvic parameters were assessed. For functional assessment, the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and patient satisfaction rate (PSR) were utilized. Results. A total of 21 levels in 21 patients were studied. DH, DA, SLA, and LLA had increased from their preoperative measures at the final follow-up. Fusion rate was 86.7% (18/21) at 12 months' follow-up. The most common cage position was anteromedial (15/21). The mean VAS scores for back and leg pain mean ODI scores improved significantly at the final follow-up. PSR was 88%. Cage subsidence was observed in 33.3% (7/21). Conclusions. The clinical and radiologic outcomes after MIS-TLIF at L5-S1 in patients with spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis are generally favorable. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4940521/ /pubmed/27433472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2518394 Text en Copyright © 2016 Won-Suh Choi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Choi, Won-Suh
Kim, Jin-Sung
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
Hur, Jung-Woo
Seong, Ji-Hoon
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes
title Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes
title_full Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes
title_short Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes
title_sort minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at l5-s1 through a unilateral approach: technical feasibility and outcomes
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2518394
work_keys_str_mv AT choiwonsuh minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionatl5s1throughaunilateralapproachtechnicalfeasibilityandoutcomes
AT kimjinsung minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionatl5s1throughaunilateralapproachtechnicalfeasibilityandoutcomes
AT ryukyeongsik minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionatl5s1throughaunilateralapproachtechnicalfeasibilityandoutcomes
AT hurjungwoo minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionatl5s1throughaunilateralapproachtechnicalfeasibilityandoutcomes
AT seongjihoon minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionatl5s1throughaunilateralapproachtechnicalfeasibilityandoutcomes