Cargando…
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes
Background. Minimally invasive spinal transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) at L5-S1 is technically more demanding than it is at other levels because of the anatomical and biomechanical traits. Objective. To determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIS-TLIF for treatment of si...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2518394 |
_version_ | 1782442158038450176 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Won-Suh Kim, Jin-Sung Ryu, Kyeong-Sik Hur, Jung-Woo Seong, Ji-Hoon |
author_facet | Choi, Won-Suh Kim, Jin-Sung Ryu, Kyeong-Sik Hur, Jung-Woo Seong, Ji-Hoon |
author_sort | Choi, Won-Suh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Minimally invasive spinal transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) at L5-S1 is technically more demanding than it is at other levels because of the anatomical and biomechanical traits. Objective. To determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIS-TLIF for treatment of single-level spinal stenosis low-grade isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1. Methods. Radiological data and electronic medical records of patients who underwent MIS-TLIF between May 2012 and December 2014 were reviewed. Fusion rate, cage position, disc height (DH), disc angle (DA), disc slope angle, segmental lordotic angle (SLA), lumbar lordotic angle (LLA), and pelvic parameters were assessed. For functional assessment, the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and patient satisfaction rate (PSR) were utilized. Results. A total of 21 levels in 21 patients were studied. DH, DA, SLA, and LLA had increased from their preoperative measures at the final follow-up. Fusion rate was 86.7% (18/21) at 12 months' follow-up. The most common cage position was anteromedial (15/21). The mean VAS scores for back and leg pain mean ODI scores improved significantly at the final follow-up. PSR was 88%. Cage subsidence was observed in 33.3% (7/21). Conclusions. The clinical and radiologic outcomes after MIS-TLIF at L5-S1 in patients with spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis are generally favorable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4940521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49405212016-07-18 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes Choi, Won-Suh Kim, Jin-Sung Ryu, Kyeong-Sik Hur, Jung-Woo Seong, Ji-Hoon Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Background. Minimally invasive spinal transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) at L5-S1 is technically more demanding than it is at other levels because of the anatomical and biomechanical traits. Objective. To determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIS-TLIF for treatment of single-level spinal stenosis low-grade isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1. Methods. Radiological data and electronic medical records of patients who underwent MIS-TLIF between May 2012 and December 2014 were reviewed. Fusion rate, cage position, disc height (DH), disc angle (DA), disc slope angle, segmental lordotic angle (SLA), lumbar lordotic angle (LLA), and pelvic parameters were assessed. For functional assessment, the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and patient satisfaction rate (PSR) were utilized. Results. A total of 21 levels in 21 patients were studied. DH, DA, SLA, and LLA had increased from their preoperative measures at the final follow-up. Fusion rate was 86.7% (18/21) at 12 months' follow-up. The most common cage position was anteromedial (15/21). The mean VAS scores for back and leg pain mean ODI scores improved significantly at the final follow-up. PSR was 88%. Cage subsidence was observed in 33.3% (7/21). Conclusions. The clinical and radiologic outcomes after MIS-TLIF at L5-S1 in patients with spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis are generally favorable. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4940521/ /pubmed/27433472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2518394 Text en Copyright © 2016 Won-Suh Choi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Choi, Won-Suh Kim, Jin-Sung Ryu, Kyeong-Sik Hur, Jung-Woo Seong, Ji-Hoon Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes |
title | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes |
title_full | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes |
title_short | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes |
title_sort | minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at l5-s1 through a unilateral approach: technical feasibility and outcomes |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2518394 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choiwonsuh minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionatl5s1throughaunilateralapproachtechnicalfeasibilityandoutcomes AT kimjinsung minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionatl5s1throughaunilateralapproachtechnicalfeasibilityandoutcomes AT ryukyeongsik minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionatl5s1throughaunilateralapproachtechnicalfeasibilityandoutcomes AT hurjungwoo minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionatl5s1throughaunilateralapproachtechnicalfeasibilityandoutcomes AT seongjihoon minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionatl5s1throughaunilateralapproachtechnicalfeasibilityandoutcomes |