Cargando…

Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center

BACKGROUND: Placement of a percutaneous coronary sinus catheter (CSC) by an anesthesiologist for retrograde cardioplegia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery is relatively safe in experienced hands. However, the popularity of its placement remains limited to a small number of centers due to its per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanada, Satoshi, Sakamoto, Hajime, Swerczek, Michael, Ueda, Kenichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0203-4
_version_ 1782442179583541248
author Hanada, Satoshi
Sakamoto, Hajime
Swerczek, Michael
Ueda, Kenichi
author_facet Hanada, Satoshi
Sakamoto, Hajime
Swerczek, Michael
Ueda, Kenichi
author_sort Hanada, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Placement of a percutaneous coronary sinus catheter (CSC) by an anesthesiologist for retrograde cardioplegia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery is relatively safe in experienced hands. However, the popularity of its placement remains limited to a small number of centers due to its perceived complexity and potential complications. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cardiac cases performed by one surgeon between December 2009 and April 2012. The reviewed cases were divided into two groups: cardiac cases with percutaneous CSC placement (CSC group) and cardiac cases without placement (control group). Anesthesia preparation time (APT) was then compared between the CSC group and control group. In the CSC group, cases were further divided into two groups. One group contained cases with an APT of less than 90 min (success group) and the other contained cases with an APT greater than or equal to 90 min or cases with CSC placement failure (delay/failure group). Patients’ characteristics, type of surgery, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) findings were compared between the two groups (success group vs. delay/failure group) to identify variables associated with prolongation of the APT or CSC placement failure. RESULTS: Percutaneous CSC placement was required in 83 cases (CSC group). The catheter was successfully placed in 74 of those cases. We experienced one complication, coronary sinus injury after multiple attempts at placing the catheter. The mean APT was 102 ± 31 min in the CSC group (n = 81) and 42 ± 15 min in the control group (n = 285). We could not identify any variables associated with prolongation of the APT or catheter placement failure. CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of the placement was 89.1 % in our academic center. On average, placing the CSC added approximately one additional hour to the APT. This time is not an accurate representation of true catheter placement time, as it included time for preparation of the CSC, TEE, and fluoroscopy. We experienced one documented complication (coronary sinus injury), which was immediately diagnosed by TEE and fluoroscopy in the operating room. No variables associated with prolongation of APT or CSC placement failure were identified. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-016-0203-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4940684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49406842016-07-13 Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center Hanada, Satoshi Sakamoto, Hajime Swerczek, Michael Ueda, Kenichi BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Placement of a percutaneous coronary sinus catheter (CSC) by an anesthesiologist for retrograde cardioplegia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery is relatively safe in experienced hands. However, the popularity of its placement remains limited to a small number of centers due to its perceived complexity and potential complications. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cardiac cases performed by one surgeon between December 2009 and April 2012. The reviewed cases were divided into two groups: cardiac cases with percutaneous CSC placement (CSC group) and cardiac cases without placement (control group). Anesthesia preparation time (APT) was then compared between the CSC group and control group. In the CSC group, cases were further divided into two groups. One group contained cases with an APT of less than 90 min (success group) and the other contained cases with an APT greater than or equal to 90 min or cases with CSC placement failure (delay/failure group). Patients’ characteristics, type of surgery, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) findings were compared between the two groups (success group vs. delay/failure group) to identify variables associated with prolongation of the APT or CSC placement failure. RESULTS: Percutaneous CSC placement was required in 83 cases (CSC group). The catheter was successfully placed in 74 of those cases. We experienced one complication, coronary sinus injury after multiple attempts at placing the catheter. The mean APT was 102 ± 31 min in the CSC group (n = 81) and 42 ± 15 min in the control group (n = 285). We could not identify any variables associated with prolongation of the APT or catheter placement failure. CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of the placement was 89.1 % in our academic center. On average, placing the CSC added approximately one additional hour to the APT. This time is not an accurate representation of true catheter placement time, as it included time for preparation of the CSC, TEE, and fluoroscopy. We experienced one documented complication (coronary sinus injury), which was immediately diagnosed by TEE and fluoroscopy in the operating room. No variables associated with prolongation of APT or CSC placement failure were identified. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-016-0203-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4940684/ /pubmed/27401491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0203-4 Text en © Hanada et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hanada, Satoshi
Sakamoto, Hajime
Swerczek, Michael
Ueda, Kenichi
Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center
title Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center
title_full Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center
title_fullStr Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center
title_full_unstemmed Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center
title_short Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center
title_sort initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0203-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hanadasatoshi initialexperiencewithpercutaneouscoronarysinuscatheterplacementinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryinanacademiccenter
AT sakamotohajime initialexperiencewithpercutaneouscoronarysinuscatheterplacementinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryinanacademiccenter
AT swerczekmichael initialexperiencewithpercutaneouscoronarysinuscatheterplacementinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryinanacademiccenter
AT uedakenichi initialexperiencewithpercutaneouscoronarysinuscatheterplacementinminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryinanacademiccenter