Cargando…

Evaluation of two selection tests for recruitment into radiology specialty training

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated whether two selection tests previously validated for primary care General Practice (GP) trainee selection could provide a valid shortlisting selection method for entry into specialty training for the secondary care specialty of radiology. METHODS: We conducted a retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patterson, Fiona, Knight, Alec, McKnight, Liam, Booth, Thomas C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27400783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0687-0
_version_ 1782442183513604096
author Patterson, Fiona
Knight, Alec
McKnight, Liam
Booth, Thomas C.
author_facet Patterson, Fiona
Knight, Alec
McKnight, Liam
Booth, Thomas C.
author_sort Patterson, Fiona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluated whether two selection tests previously validated for primary care General Practice (GP) trainee selection could provide a valid shortlisting selection method for entry into specialty training for the secondary care specialty of radiology. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from radiology applicants who also applied to UK GP specialty training or Core Medical Training. The psychometric properties of the two selection tests, a clinical problem solving (CPS) test and situational judgement test (SJT), were analysed to evaluate their reliability. Predictive validity of the tests was analysed by comparing them with the current radiology selection assessments, and the licensure examination results taken after the first stage of training (Fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists (FRCR) Part 1). RESULTS: The internal reliability of the two selection tests in the radiology applicant sample was good (α ≥ 0.80). The average correlation with radiology shortlisting selection scores was r = 0.26 for the CPS (with p < 0.05 in 5 of 11 shortlisting centres), r = 0.15 for the SJT (with p < 0.05 in 2 of 11 shortlisting centres) and r = 0.25 (with p < 0.05 in 5 of 11 shortlisting centres) for the two tests combined. The CPS test scores significantly correlated with performance in both components of the FRCR Part 1 examinations (r = 0.5 anatomy; r = 0.4 physics; p < 0.05 for both). The SJT did not correlate with either component of the examination. CONCLUSIONS: The current CPS test may be an appropriate selection method for shortlisting in radiology but would benefit from further refinement for use in radiology to ensure that the test specification is relevant. The evidence on whether the SJT may be appropriate for shortlisting in radiology is limited. However, these results may be expected to some extent since the SJT is designed to measure non-academic attributes. Further validation work (e.g. with non-academic outcome variables) is required to evaluate whether an SJT will add value in recruitment for radiology specialty training and will further inform construct validity of SJTs as a selection methodology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4940701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49407012016-07-13 Evaluation of two selection tests for recruitment into radiology specialty training Patterson, Fiona Knight, Alec McKnight, Liam Booth, Thomas C. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: This study evaluated whether two selection tests previously validated for primary care General Practice (GP) trainee selection could provide a valid shortlisting selection method for entry into specialty training for the secondary care specialty of radiology. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from radiology applicants who also applied to UK GP specialty training or Core Medical Training. The psychometric properties of the two selection tests, a clinical problem solving (CPS) test and situational judgement test (SJT), were analysed to evaluate their reliability. Predictive validity of the tests was analysed by comparing them with the current radiology selection assessments, and the licensure examination results taken after the first stage of training (Fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists (FRCR) Part 1). RESULTS: The internal reliability of the two selection tests in the radiology applicant sample was good (α ≥ 0.80). The average correlation with radiology shortlisting selection scores was r = 0.26 for the CPS (with p < 0.05 in 5 of 11 shortlisting centres), r = 0.15 for the SJT (with p < 0.05 in 2 of 11 shortlisting centres) and r = 0.25 (with p < 0.05 in 5 of 11 shortlisting centres) for the two tests combined. The CPS test scores significantly correlated with performance in both components of the FRCR Part 1 examinations (r = 0.5 anatomy; r = 0.4 physics; p < 0.05 for both). The SJT did not correlate with either component of the examination. CONCLUSIONS: The current CPS test may be an appropriate selection method for shortlisting in radiology but would benefit from further refinement for use in radiology to ensure that the test specification is relevant. The evidence on whether the SJT may be appropriate for shortlisting in radiology is limited. However, these results may be expected to some extent since the SJT is designed to measure non-academic attributes. Further validation work (e.g. with non-academic outcome variables) is required to evaluate whether an SJT will add value in recruitment for radiology specialty training and will further inform construct validity of SJTs as a selection methodology. BioMed Central 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4940701/ /pubmed/27400783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0687-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Patterson, Fiona
Knight, Alec
McKnight, Liam
Booth, Thomas C.
Evaluation of two selection tests for recruitment into radiology specialty training
title Evaluation of two selection tests for recruitment into radiology specialty training
title_full Evaluation of two selection tests for recruitment into radiology specialty training
title_fullStr Evaluation of two selection tests for recruitment into radiology specialty training
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two selection tests for recruitment into radiology specialty training
title_short Evaluation of two selection tests for recruitment into radiology specialty training
title_sort evaluation of two selection tests for recruitment into radiology specialty training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27400783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0687-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pattersonfiona evaluationoftwoselectiontestsforrecruitmentintoradiologyspecialtytraining
AT knightalec evaluationoftwoselectiontestsforrecruitmentintoradiologyspecialtytraining
AT mcknightliam evaluationoftwoselectiontestsforrecruitmentintoradiologyspecialtytraining
AT booththomasc evaluationoftwoselectiontestsforrecruitmentintoradiologyspecialtytraining