Cargando…

Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT

BACKGROUND: To study the reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) with microCT (μCT) as gold standard in the visual detection of cortical breaks in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints. METHODS: Ten cadaveric fingers (10 MCP and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scharmga, A., Peters, M., van Tubergen, A., van den Bergh, J., de Jong, J., Loeffen, D., van Rietbergen, B., Weijers, R., Geusens, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y
_version_ 1782442187661770752
author Scharmga, A.
Peters, M.
van Tubergen, A.
van den Bergh, J.
de Jong, J.
Loeffen, D.
van Rietbergen, B.
Weijers, R.
Geusens, P.
author_facet Scharmga, A.
Peters, M.
van Tubergen, A.
van den Bergh, J.
de Jong, J.
Loeffen, D.
van Rietbergen, B.
Weijers, R.
Geusens, P.
author_sort Scharmga, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To study the reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) with microCT (μCT) as gold standard in the visual detection of cortical breaks in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints. METHODS: Ten cadaveric fingers (10 MCP and 9 PIP joints) were imaged by HR-pQCT and μCT and visually analyzed by two independent readers. Intra- and interreader reliability were evaluated for the presence (yes/no, kappa statistics) and the total number (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) of cortical breaks. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV respectively NPV) of HR-pQCT in detecting cortical breaks were calculated. RESULTS: With HR-pQCT, mean 149 cortical breaks were identified and with μCT mean 129 (p < 0.05). Intrareader reliability for the presence of a cortical break per quadrant was 0.52 (95 % CI 0.48–0.56) and 0.71 (95 % CI 0.67–0.75) for HR-pQCT and μCT, respectively, and for the total number of cortical breaks 0.61 (95 % CI 0.49–0.70) and 0.75 (95 % CI 0.68–0.82). Interreader reliability for the presence of a cortical break per quadrant was 0.37 (95 % CI 0.33–0.41) and 0.45 (95 % CI 0.41–0.49) for HR-pQCT and μCT, respectively, and for the number of cortical breaks 0.55 (95 % CI 0.43–0.65) and 0.54 (95 % CI 0.35–0.67). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of HR-pQCT were 81.6, 64.0, 81.6, and 64 % respectively. CONCLUSION: Cortical breaks were commonly visualized in MCP and PIP joints with HR-pQCT and μCT. Reliability of both HR-pQCT and μCT was fair to moderate. HR-pQCT was highly sensitive to detect cortical breaks with μCT as gold standard. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4940720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49407202016-07-13 Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT Scharmga, A. Peters, M. van Tubergen, A. van den Bergh, J. de Jong, J. Loeffen, D. van Rietbergen, B. Weijers, R. Geusens, P. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: To study the reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) with microCT (μCT) as gold standard in the visual detection of cortical breaks in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints. METHODS: Ten cadaveric fingers (10 MCP and 9 PIP joints) were imaged by HR-pQCT and μCT and visually analyzed by two independent readers. Intra- and interreader reliability were evaluated for the presence (yes/no, kappa statistics) and the total number (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) of cortical breaks. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV respectively NPV) of HR-pQCT in detecting cortical breaks were calculated. RESULTS: With HR-pQCT, mean 149 cortical breaks were identified and with μCT mean 129 (p < 0.05). Intrareader reliability for the presence of a cortical break per quadrant was 0.52 (95 % CI 0.48–0.56) and 0.71 (95 % CI 0.67–0.75) for HR-pQCT and μCT, respectively, and for the total number of cortical breaks 0.61 (95 % CI 0.49–0.70) and 0.75 (95 % CI 0.68–0.82). Interreader reliability for the presence of a cortical break per quadrant was 0.37 (95 % CI 0.33–0.41) and 0.45 (95 % CI 0.41–0.49) for HR-pQCT and μCT, respectively, and for the number of cortical breaks 0.55 (95 % CI 0.43–0.65) and 0.54 (95 % CI 0.35–0.67). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of HR-pQCT were 81.6, 64.0, 81.6, and 64 % respectively. CONCLUSION: Cortical breaks were commonly visualized in MCP and PIP joints with HR-pQCT and μCT. Reliability of both HR-pQCT and μCT was fair to moderate. HR-pQCT was highly sensitive to detect cortical breaks with μCT as gold standard. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4940720/ /pubmed/27401097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scharmga, A.
Peters, M.
van Tubergen, A.
van den Bergh, J.
de Jong, J.
Loeffen, D.
van Rietbergen, B.
Weijers, R.
Geusens, P.
Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT
title Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT
title_full Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT
title_fullStr Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT
title_full_unstemmed Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT
title_short Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT
title_sort visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative ct compared to microct
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y
work_keys_str_mv AT scharmgaa visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct
AT petersm visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct
AT vantubergena visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct
AT vandenberghj visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct
AT dejongj visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct
AT loeffend visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct
AT vanrietbergenb visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct
AT weijersr visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct
AT geusensp visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct