Cargando…
Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT
BACKGROUND: To study the reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) with microCT (μCT) as gold standard in the visual detection of cortical breaks in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints. METHODS: Ten cadaveric fingers (10 MCP and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y |
_version_ | 1782442187661770752 |
---|---|
author | Scharmga, A. Peters, M. van Tubergen, A. van den Bergh, J. de Jong, J. Loeffen, D. van Rietbergen, B. Weijers, R. Geusens, P. |
author_facet | Scharmga, A. Peters, M. van Tubergen, A. van den Bergh, J. de Jong, J. Loeffen, D. van Rietbergen, B. Weijers, R. Geusens, P. |
author_sort | Scharmga, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To study the reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) with microCT (μCT) as gold standard in the visual detection of cortical breaks in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints. METHODS: Ten cadaveric fingers (10 MCP and 9 PIP joints) were imaged by HR-pQCT and μCT and visually analyzed by two independent readers. Intra- and interreader reliability were evaluated for the presence (yes/no, kappa statistics) and the total number (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) of cortical breaks. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV respectively NPV) of HR-pQCT in detecting cortical breaks were calculated. RESULTS: With HR-pQCT, mean 149 cortical breaks were identified and with μCT mean 129 (p < 0.05). Intrareader reliability for the presence of a cortical break per quadrant was 0.52 (95 % CI 0.48–0.56) and 0.71 (95 % CI 0.67–0.75) for HR-pQCT and μCT, respectively, and for the total number of cortical breaks 0.61 (95 % CI 0.49–0.70) and 0.75 (95 % CI 0.68–0.82). Interreader reliability for the presence of a cortical break per quadrant was 0.37 (95 % CI 0.33–0.41) and 0.45 (95 % CI 0.41–0.49) for HR-pQCT and μCT, respectively, and for the number of cortical breaks 0.55 (95 % CI 0.43–0.65) and 0.54 (95 % CI 0.35–0.67). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of HR-pQCT were 81.6, 64.0, 81.6, and 64 % respectively. CONCLUSION: Cortical breaks were commonly visualized in MCP and PIP joints with HR-pQCT and μCT. Reliability of both HR-pQCT and μCT was fair to moderate. HR-pQCT was highly sensitive to detect cortical breaks with μCT as gold standard. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4940720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49407202016-07-13 Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT Scharmga, A. Peters, M. van Tubergen, A. van den Bergh, J. de Jong, J. Loeffen, D. van Rietbergen, B. Weijers, R. Geusens, P. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: To study the reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) with microCT (μCT) as gold standard in the visual detection of cortical breaks in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints. METHODS: Ten cadaveric fingers (10 MCP and 9 PIP joints) were imaged by HR-pQCT and μCT and visually analyzed by two independent readers. Intra- and interreader reliability were evaluated for the presence (yes/no, kappa statistics) and the total number (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) of cortical breaks. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV respectively NPV) of HR-pQCT in detecting cortical breaks were calculated. RESULTS: With HR-pQCT, mean 149 cortical breaks were identified and with μCT mean 129 (p < 0.05). Intrareader reliability for the presence of a cortical break per quadrant was 0.52 (95 % CI 0.48–0.56) and 0.71 (95 % CI 0.67–0.75) for HR-pQCT and μCT, respectively, and for the total number of cortical breaks 0.61 (95 % CI 0.49–0.70) and 0.75 (95 % CI 0.68–0.82). Interreader reliability for the presence of a cortical break per quadrant was 0.37 (95 % CI 0.33–0.41) and 0.45 (95 % CI 0.41–0.49) for HR-pQCT and μCT, respectively, and for the number of cortical breaks 0.55 (95 % CI 0.43–0.65) and 0.54 (95 % CI 0.35–0.67). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of HR-pQCT were 81.6, 64.0, 81.6, and 64 % respectively. CONCLUSION: Cortical breaks were commonly visualized in MCP and PIP joints with HR-pQCT and μCT. Reliability of both HR-pQCT and μCT was fair to moderate. HR-pQCT was highly sensitive to detect cortical breaks with μCT as gold standard. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4940720/ /pubmed/27401097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Scharmga, A. Peters, M. van Tubergen, A. van den Bergh, J. de Jong, J. Loeffen, D. van Rietbergen, B. Weijers, R. Geusens, P. Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT |
title | Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT |
title_full | Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT |
title_fullStr | Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT |
title_short | Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT |
title_sort | visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative ct compared to microct |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scharmgaa visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct AT petersm visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct AT vantubergena visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct AT vandenberghj visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct AT dejongj visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct AT loeffend visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct AT vanrietbergenb visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct AT weijersr visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct AT geusensp visualdetectionofcorticalbreaksinhandjointsreliabilityandvalidityofhighresolutionperipheralquantitativectcomparedtomicroct |