Cargando…

Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing breast cancer during the early stage may be helpful for decreasing cancer-related mortality. In Western developed countries, mammographies have been the gold standard for breast cancer detection. However, Chinese women usually have denser and smaller-sized breasts compared to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Xiuyan, Hu, Guoming, Zhang, Zhigang, Qiu, Fuming, Shao, Xuan, Wang, Xiaochen, Zhan, Hongwei, Chen, Yiding, Deng, Yongchuan, Huang, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2537-1
_version_ 1782442212750000128
author Yu, Xiuyan
Hu, Guoming
Zhang, Zhigang
Qiu, Fuming
Shao, Xuan
Wang, Xiaochen
Zhan, Hongwei
Chen, Yiding
Deng, Yongchuan
Huang, Jian
author_facet Yu, Xiuyan
Hu, Guoming
Zhang, Zhigang
Qiu, Fuming
Shao, Xuan
Wang, Xiaochen
Zhan, Hongwei
Chen, Yiding
Deng, Yongchuan
Huang, Jian
author_sort Yu, Xiuyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosing breast cancer during the early stage may be helpful for decreasing cancer-related mortality. In Western developed countries, mammographies have been the gold standard for breast cancer detection. However, Chinese women usually have denser and smaller-sized breasts compared to Caucasian women, which decreases the diagnostic accuracy of mammography. However, breast specific gamma imaging, a type of molecular functional breast imaging, has been used for the accurate diagnosis of breast cancer and is not influenced by breast density. Our objective was to analyze the breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) diagnostic value for Chinese women. METHODS: During a 2-year period, 357 women were diagnosed and treated at our oncology department and received BSGI in addition to mammography (MMG), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnostic assessment. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of each method of detection and compared the biological profiles of the four imaging methods. RESULTS: A total of 357 women received a final surgical pathology diagnosis, with 168 malignant diseases (58.5 %) and 119 benign diseases (41.5 %). Of these, 166 underwent the four imaging tests preoperatively. The sensitivity of BSGI was 80.35 and 82.14 % by US, 75.6 % by MMG, and 94.06 % by MRI. Furthermore, the breast cancer diagnosis specificity of BSGI was high (83.19 % vs. 77.31 % vs. 66.39 % vs. 67.69 %, respectively). The BSGI diagnostic sensitivity for mammographic breast density in women was superior to mammography and more sensitive for non-luminal A subtypes (luminal A vs. non-luminal A, 68.63 % vs. 88.30 %). CONCLUSIONS: BSGI may help improve the ability to diagnose early stage breast cancer for Chinese women, particularly for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), mammographic breast density and non-luminal A breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4940883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49408832016-07-13 Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women Yu, Xiuyan Hu, Guoming Zhang, Zhigang Qiu, Fuming Shao, Xuan Wang, Xiaochen Zhan, Hongwei Chen, Yiding Deng, Yongchuan Huang, Jian BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosing breast cancer during the early stage may be helpful for decreasing cancer-related mortality. In Western developed countries, mammographies have been the gold standard for breast cancer detection. However, Chinese women usually have denser and smaller-sized breasts compared to Caucasian women, which decreases the diagnostic accuracy of mammography. However, breast specific gamma imaging, a type of molecular functional breast imaging, has been used for the accurate diagnosis of breast cancer and is not influenced by breast density. Our objective was to analyze the breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) diagnostic value for Chinese women. METHODS: During a 2-year period, 357 women were diagnosed and treated at our oncology department and received BSGI in addition to mammography (MMG), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnostic assessment. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of each method of detection and compared the biological profiles of the four imaging methods. RESULTS: A total of 357 women received a final surgical pathology diagnosis, with 168 malignant diseases (58.5 %) and 119 benign diseases (41.5 %). Of these, 166 underwent the four imaging tests preoperatively. The sensitivity of BSGI was 80.35 and 82.14 % by US, 75.6 % by MMG, and 94.06 % by MRI. Furthermore, the breast cancer diagnosis specificity of BSGI was high (83.19 % vs. 77.31 % vs. 66.39 % vs. 67.69 %, respectively). The BSGI diagnostic sensitivity for mammographic breast density in women was superior to mammography and more sensitive for non-luminal A subtypes (luminal A vs. non-luminal A, 68.63 % vs. 88.30 %). CONCLUSIONS: BSGI may help improve the ability to diagnose early stage breast cancer for Chinese women, particularly for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), mammographic breast density and non-luminal A breast cancer. BioMed Central 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4940883/ /pubmed/27401536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2537-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yu, Xiuyan
Hu, Guoming
Zhang, Zhigang
Qiu, Fuming
Shao, Xuan
Wang, Xiaochen
Zhan, Hongwei
Chen, Yiding
Deng, Yongchuan
Huang, Jian
Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women
title Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women
title_full Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women
title_fullStr Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women
title_short Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women
title_sort retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)tc-sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in chinese women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2537-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxiuyan retrospectiveandcomparativeanalysisof99mtcsestamibibreastspecificgammaimagingversusmammographyultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionofbreastcancerinchinesewomen
AT huguoming retrospectiveandcomparativeanalysisof99mtcsestamibibreastspecificgammaimagingversusmammographyultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionofbreastcancerinchinesewomen
AT zhangzhigang retrospectiveandcomparativeanalysisof99mtcsestamibibreastspecificgammaimagingversusmammographyultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionofbreastcancerinchinesewomen
AT qiufuming retrospectiveandcomparativeanalysisof99mtcsestamibibreastspecificgammaimagingversusmammographyultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionofbreastcancerinchinesewomen
AT shaoxuan retrospectiveandcomparativeanalysisof99mtcsestamibibreastspecificgammaimagingversusmammographyultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionofbreastcancerinchinesewomen
AT wangxiaochen retrospectiveandcomparativeanalysisof99mtcsestamibibreastspecificgammaimagingversusmammographyultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionofbreastcancerinchinesewomen
AT zhanhongwei retrospectiveandcomparativeanalysisof99mtcsestamibibreastspecificgammaimagingversusmammographyultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionofbreastcancerinchinesewomen
AT chenyiding retrospectiveandcomparativeanalysisof99mtcsestamibibreastspecificgammaimagingversusmammographyultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionofbreastcancerinchinesewomen
AT dengyongchuan retrospectiveandcomparativeanalysisof99mtcsestamibibreastspecificgammaimagingversusmammographyultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionofbreastcancerinchinesewomen
AT huangjian retrospectiveandcomparativeanalysisof99mtcsestamibibreastspecificgammaimagingversusmammographyultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionofbreastcancerinchinesewomen