Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

OBJECTIVES: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have shown diminished clinical response following an inadequate response (IR) to ≥1 previous bDMARD. Here, tofacitinib was compared with placebo in patients with an IR to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs; bDMARD-naive) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charles-Schoeman, Christina, Burmester, Gerd, Nash, Peter, Zerbini, Cristiano A F, Soma, Koshika, Kwok, Kenneth, Hendrikx, Thijs, Bananis, Eustratios, Fleischmann, Roy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26275429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207178
_version_ 1782442260681457664
author Charles-Schoeman, Christina
Burmester, Gerd
Nash, Peter
Zerbini, Cristiano A F
Soma, Koshika
Kwok, Kenneth
Hendrikx, Thijs
Bananis, Eustratios
Fleischmann, Roy
author_facet Charles-Schoeman, Christina
Burmester, Gerd
Nash, Peter
Zerbini, Cristiano A F
Soma, Koshika
Kwok, Kenneth
Hendrikx, Thijs
Bananis, Eustratios
Fleischmann, Roy
author_sort Charles-Schoeman, Christina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have shown diminished clinical response following an inadequate response (IR) to ≥1 previous bDMARD. Here, tofacitinib was compared with placebo in patients with an IR to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs; bDMARD-naive) and in patients with an IR to bDMARDs (bDMARD-IR). METHODS: Data were taken from phase II and phase III studies of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, or placebo, as monotherapy or with background methotrexate or other csDMARDs. Efficacy endpoints and incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) of special interest were assessed. RESULTS: 2812 bDMARD-naive and 705 bDMARD-IR patients were analysed. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups within subpopulations. Across subpopulations, improvements in efficacy parameters at month 3 were generally significantly greater for both tofacitinib doses versus placebo. Clinical response was numerically greater with bDMARD-naive versus bDMARD-IR patients (overlapping 95% CIs). Rates of safety events of special interest were generally similar between tofacitinib doses and subpopulations; however, patients receiving glucocorticoids had more serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, serious infection events and herpes zoster. Numerically greater clinical responses and incidence rates of AEs of special interest were generally reported for tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily versus tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (overlapping 95% CIs). CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib demonstrated efficacy in both bDMARD-naive and bDMARD-IR patients with RA. Clinical response to tofacitinib was generally numerically greater in bDMARD-naive than bDMARD-IR patients. The safety profile appeared similar between subpopulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: (NCT00413660, NCT0050446, NCT00603512, NCT00687193, NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4941182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49411822016-07-13 Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs Charles-Schoeman, Christina Burmester, Gerd Nash, Peter Zerbini, Cristiano A F Soma, Koshika Kwok, Kenneth Hendrikx, Thijs Bananis, Eustratios Fleischmann, Roy Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVES: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have shown diminished clinical response following an inadequate response (IR) to ≥1 previous bDMARD. Here, tofacitinib was compared with placebo in patients with an IR to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs; bDMARD-naive) and in patients with an IR to bDMARDs (bDMARD-IR). METHODS: Data were taken from phase II and phase III studies of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, or placebo, as monotherapy or with background methotrexate or other csDMARDs. Efficacy endpoints and incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) of special interest were assessed. RESULTS: 2812 bDMARD-naive and 705 bDMARD-IR patients were analysed. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups within subpopulations. Across subpopulations, improvements in efficacy parameters at month 3 were generally significantly greater for both tofacitinib doses versus placebo. Clinical response was numerically greater with bDMARD-naive versus bDMARD-IR patients (overlapping 95% CIs). Rates of safety events of special interest were generally similar between tofacitinib doses and subpopulations; however, patients receiving glucocorticoids had more serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, serious infection events and herpes zoster. Numerically greater clinical responses and incidence rates of AEs of special interest were generally reported for tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily versus tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (overlapping 95% CIs). CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib demonstrated efficacy in both bDMARD-naive and bDMARD-IR patients with RA. Clinical response to tofacitinib was generally numerically greater in bDMARD-naive than bDMARD-IR patients. The safety profile appeared similar between subpopulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: (NCT00413660, NCT0050446, NCT00603512, NCT00687193, NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385). BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07 2015-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4941182/ /pubmed/26275429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207178 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiological Research
Charles-Schoeman, Christina
Burmester, Gerd
Nash, Peter
Zerbini, Cristiano A F
Soma, Koshika
Kwok, Kenneth
Hendrikx, Thijs
Bananis, Eustratios
Fleischmann, Roy
Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
title Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
title_full Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
title_short Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
title_sort efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
topic Clinical and Epidemiological Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26275429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207178
work_keys_str_mv AT charlesschoemanchristina efficacyandsafetyoftofacitinibfollowinginadequateresponsetoconventionalsyntheticorbiologicaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT burmestergerd efficacyandsafetyoftofacitinibfollowinginadequateresponsetoconventionalsyntheticorbiologicaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT nashpeter efficacyandsafetyoftofacitinibfollowinginadequateresponsetoconventionalsyntheticorbiologicaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT zerbinicristianoaf efficacyandsafetyoftofacitinibfollowinginadequateresponsetoconventionalsyntheticorbiologicaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT somakoshika efficacyandsafetyoftofacitinibfollowinginadequateresponsetoconventionalsyntheticorbiologicaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT kwokkenneth efficacyandsafetyoftofacitinibfollowinginadequateresponsetoconventionalsyntheticorbiologicaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT hendrikxthijs efficacyandsafetyoftofacitinibfollowinginadequateresponsetoconventionalsyntheticorbiologicaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT bananiseustratios efficacyandsafetyoftofacitinibfollowinginadequateresponsetoconventionalsyntheticorbiologicaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT fleischmannroy efficacyandsafetyoftofacitinibfollowinginadequateresponsetoconventionalsyntheticorbiologicaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs