Cargando…

How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England

BACKGROUND: Provision of universal coverage is essential for achieving equity in healthcare, but inequalities still exist in universal healthcare systems. Between 2004/2005 and 2011/2012, the National Health Service (NHS) in England, which has provided universal coverage since 1948, made sustained e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asaria, Miqdad, Ali, Shehzad, Doran, Tim, Ferguson, Brian, Fleetcroft, Robert, Goddard, Maria, Goldblatt, Peter, Laudicella, Mauro, Raine, Rosalind, Cookson, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26787198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206742
_version_ 1782442262553165824
author Asaria, Miqdad
Ali, Shehzad
Doran, Tim
Ferguson, Brian
Fleetcroft, Robert
Goddard, Maria
Goldblatt, Peter
Laudicella, Mauro
Raine, Rosalind
Cookson, Richard
author_facet Asaria, Miqdad
Ali, Shehzad
Doran, Tim
Ferguson, Brian
Fleetcroft, Robert
Goddard, Maria
Goldblatt, Peter
Laudicella, Mauro
Raine, Rosalind
Cookson, Richard
author_sort Asaria, Miqdad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Provision of universal coverage is essential for achieving equity in healthcare, but inequalities still exist in universal healthcare systems. Between 2004/2005 and 2011/2012, the National Health Service (NHS) in England, which has provided universal coverage since 1948, made sustained efforts to reduce health inequalities by strengthening primary care. We provide the first comprehensive assessment of trends in socioeconomic inequalities of primary care access, quality and outcomes during this period. METHODS: Whole-population small area longitudinal study based on 32 482 neighbourhoods of approximately 1500 people in England from 2004/2005 to 2011/2012. We measured slope indices of inequality in four indicators: (1) patients per family doctor, (2) primary care quality, (3) preventable emergency hospital admissions and (4) mortality from conditions considered amenable to healthcare. RESULTS: Between 2004/2005 and 2011/2012, there were larger absolute improvements on all indicators in more-deprived neighbourhoods. The modelled gap between the most-deprived and least-deprived neighbourhoods in England decreased by: 193 patients per family doctor (95% CI 173 to 213), 3.29 percentage points of primary care quality (3.13 to 3.45), 0.42 preventable hospitalisations per 1000 people (0.29 to 0.55) and 0.23 amenable deaths per 1000 people (0.15 to 0.31). By 2011/2012, inequalities in primary care supply and quality were almost eliminated, but socioeconomic inequality was still associated with 158 396 preventable hospitalisations and 37 983 deaths amenable to healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2004/2005 and 2011/2012, the NHS succeeded in substantially reducing socioeconomic inequalities in primary care access and quality, but made only modest reductions in healthcare outcome inequalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4941190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49411902016-07-13 How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England Asaria, Miqdad Ali, Shehzad Doran, Tim Ferguson, Brian Fleetcroft, Robert Goddard, Maria Goldblatt, Peter Laudicella, Mauro Raine, Rosalind Cookson, Richard J Epidemiol Community Health Health Inequalities BACKGROUND: Provision of universal coverage is essential for achieving equity in healthcare, but inequalities still exist in universal healthcare systems. Between 2004/2005 and 2011/2012, the National Health Service (NHS) in England, which has provided universal coverage since 1948, made sustained efforts to reduce health inequalities by strengthening primary care. We provide the first comprehensive assessment of trends in socioeconomic inequalities of primary care access, quality and outcomes during this period. METHODS: Whole-population small area longitudinal study based on 32 482 neighbourhoods of approximately 1500 people in England from 2004/2005 to 2011/2012. We measured slope indices of inequality in four indicators: (1) patients per family doctor, (2) primary care quality, (3) preventable emergency hospital admissions and (4) mortality from conditions considered amenable to healthcare. RESULTS: Between 2004/2005 and 2011/2012, there were larger absolute improvements on all indicators in more-deprived neighbourhoods. The modelled gap between the most-deprived and least-deprived neighbourhoods in England decreased by: 193 patients per family doctor (95% CI 173 to 213), 3.29 percentage points of primary care quality (3.13 to 3.45), 0.42 preventable hospitalisations per 1000 people (0.29 to 0.55) and 0.23 amenable deaths per 1000 people (0.15 to 0.31). By 2011/2012, inequalities in primary care supply and quality were almost eliminated, but socioeconomic inequality was still associated with 158 396 preventable hospitalisations and 37 983 deaths amenable to healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2004/2005 and 2011/2012, the NHS succeeded in substantially reducing socioeconomic inequalities in primary care access and quality, but made only modest reductions in healthcare outcome inequalities. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07 2016-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4941190/ /pubmed/26787198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206742 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Inequalities
Asaria, Miqdad
Ali, Shehzad
Doran, Tim
Ferguson, Brian
Fleetcroft, Robert
Goddard, Maria
Goldblatt, Peter
Laudicella, Mauro
Raine, Rosalind
Cookson, Richard
How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England
title How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England
title_full How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England
title_fullStr How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England
title_full_unstemmed How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England
title_short How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England
title_sort how a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from england
topic Health Inequalities
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26787198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206742
work_keys_str_mv AT asariamiqdad howauniversalhealthsystemreducesinequalitieslessonsfromengland
AT alishehzad howauniversalhealthsystemreducesinequalitieslessonsfromengland
AT dorantim howauniversalhealthsystemreducesinequalitieslessonsfromengland
AT fergusonbrian howauniversalhealthsystemreducesinequalitieslessonsfromengland
AT fleetcroftrobert howauniversalhealthsystemreducesinequalitieslessonsfromengland
AT goddardmaria howauniversalhealthsystemreducesinequalitieslessonsfromengland
AT goldblattpeter howauniversalhealthsystemreducesinequalitieslessonsfromengland
AT laudicellamauro howauniversalhealthsystemreducesinequalitieslessonsfromengland
AT rainerosalind howauniversalhealthsystemreducesinequalitieslessonsfromengland
AT cooksonrichard howauniversalhealthsystemreducesinequalitieslessonsfromengland