Cargando…
Influence of donor–recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts
To assess the role of sex mismatch on graft survival after pancreas transplantation. We evaluated 24,195 pancreas-transplant recipients reported in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients over a 25-year period. Pancreatic graft survival (PGS) was analyzed according to donor–recipient sex pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29298 |
_version_ | 1782442307851649024 |
---|---|
author | Li, Zhiwei Mei, Shengmin Xiang, Jie Zhou, Jie Zhang, Qijun Yan, Sheng Zhou, Lin Hu, Zhenhua Zheng, Shusen |
author_facet | Li, Zhiwei Mei, Shengmin Xiang, Jie Zhou, Jie Zhang, Qijun Yan, Sheng Zhou, Lin Hu, Zhenhua Zheng, Shusen |
author_sort | Li, Zhiwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | To assess the role of sex mismatch on graft survival after pancreas transplantation. We evaluated 24,195 pancreas-transplant recipients reported in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients over a 25-year period. Pancreatic graft survival (PGS) was analyzed according to donor–recipient sex pairing using Kaplan–Meier estimations. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 14,187 male and 10,008 female recipients were included in final analyses. Mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 5.7 years. In multivariate analyses, neither recipient sex nor donor sex was associated with pancreatic graft failure (PGF), but donor–recipient sex mismatch (regardless of recipient sex) was an independent predictor of PGS (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04–1.14; p < 0.001). Compared with M → M sex-matched recipients in univariate analyses, M → F and F → M sex mismatches were associated with an increased risk of PGF. Adjustment for significant recipient and donor factors eliminated the association between F → M sex mismatch and PGF (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93–1.10; p = 0.752), but not M → F (1.09; 1.02–1.17; 0.020). Stratified analyses suggested that the negative effect of donor–recipient sex mismatch could be neutralized in older patients. These findings suggest that donor–recipient sex pairing should be taken into consideration in organ-allocation strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4941418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49414182016-07-20 Influence of donor–recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts Li, Zhiwei Mei, Shengmin Xiang, Jie Zhou, Jie Zhang, Qijun Yan, Sheng Zhou, Lin Hu, Zhenhua Zheng, Shusen Sci Rep Article To assess the role of sex mismatch on graft survival after pancreas transplantation. We evaluated 24,195 pancreas-transplant recipients reported in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients over a 25-year period. Pancreatic graft survival (PGS) was analyzed according to donor–recipient sex pairing using Kaplan–Meier estimations. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 14,187 male and 10,008 female recipients were included in final analyses. Mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 5.7 years. In multivariate analyses, neither recipient sex nor donor sex was associated with pancreatic graft failure (PGF), but donor–recipient sex mismatch (regardless of recipient sex) was an independent predictor of PGS (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04–1.14; p < 0.001). Compared with M → M sex-matched recipients in univariate analyses, M → F and F → M sex mismatches were associated with an increased risk of PGF. Adjustment for significant recipient and donor factors eliminated the association between F → M sex mismatch and PGF (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93–1.10; p = 0.752), but not M → F (1.09; 1.02–1.17; 0.020). Stratified analyses suggested that the negative effect of donor–recipient sex mismatch could be neutralized in older patients. These findings suggest that donor–recipient sex pairing should be taken into consideration in organ-allocation strategies. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4941418/ /pubmed/27403718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29298 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Zhiwei Mei, Shengmin Xiang, Jie Zhou, Jie Zhang, Qijun Yan, Sheng Zhou, Lin Hu, Zhenhua Zheng, Shusen Influence of donor–recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts |
title | Influence of donor–recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts |
title_full | Influence of donor–recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts |
title_fullStr | Influence of donor–recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of donor–recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts |
title_short | Influence of donor–recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts |
title_sort | influence of donor–recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizhiwei influenceofdonorrecipientsexmismatchonlongtermsurvivalofpancreaticgrafts AT meishengmin influenceofdonorrecipientsexmismatchonlongtermsurvivalofpancreaticgrafts AT xiangjie influenceofdonorrecipientsexmismatchonlongtermsurvivalofpancreaticgrafts AT zhoujie influenceofdonorrecipientsexmismatchonlongtermsurvivalofpancreaticgrafts AT zhangqijun influenceofdonorrecipientsexmismatchonlongtermsurvivalofpancreaticgrafts AT yansheng influenceofdonorrecipientsexmismatchonlongtermsurvivalofpancreaticgrafts AT zhoulin influenceofdonorrecipientsexmismatchonlongtermsurvivalofpancreaticgrafts AT huzhenhua influenceofdonorrecipientsexmismatchonlongtermsurvivalofpancreaticgrafts AT zhengshusen influenceofdonorrecipientsexmismatchonlongtermsurvivalofpancreaticgrafts |