Cargando…

Performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and performance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping among women with high-risk endometrial cancers. METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 with uterine cancer of grade 3 endometrioid, clear cell, serous or carcinosarcoma histology and who underwent SLN ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehrisman, Jessie, Secord, Angeles Alvarez, Berchuck, Andrew, Lee, Paula S., Di Santo, Nicola, Lopez-Acevedo, Micael, Broadwater, Gloria, Valea, Fidel A., Havrilesky, Laura J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2016.04.002
_version_ 1782442318465335296
author Ehrisman, Jessie
Secord, Angeles Alvarez
Berchuck, Andrew
Lee, Paula S.
Di Santo, Nicola
Lopez-Acevedo, Micael
Broadwater, Gloria
Valea, Fidel A.
Havrilesky, Laura J.
author_facet Ehrisman, Jessie
Secord, Angeles Alvarez
Berchuck, Andrew
Lee, Paula S.
Di Santo, Nicola
Lopez-Acevedo, Micael
Broadwater, Gloria
Valea, Fidel A.
Havrilesky, Laura J.
author_sort Ehrisman, Jessie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and performance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping among women with high-risk endometrial cancers. METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 with uterine cancer of grade 3 endometrioid, clear cell, serous or carcinosarcoma histology and who underwent SLN mapping prior to full pelvic lymph node dissection were included. Subjects underwent methylene blue or ICG injection for laparoscopic (N = 16) or robotic-assisted laparoscopic (N = 20) staging. Outcomes included SLN mapping rates, SLN and non-SLN positive rates, false negative SLN algorithm rate, and the negative predictive value (NPV) of the SLN algorithm. Fisher's exact test was used to compare mapping and node positivity rates. RESULTS: 9/36 (25%) patients with high-risk uterine cancer had at least one metastatic lymph node identified. Successful mapping occurred in 30/36 (83%) patients. SLN mapped to pelvic nodes bilaterally in 20 (56%), unilaterally in 9 (25%), and aortic nodes only in 1 (3%). Malignancy was identified in 14/95 (15%) of all sentinel nodes and 12/775 (1.5%) of all non-sentinel nodes (p < 0.001). The false negative rate of SLN mapping alone was 2/26 (7.7%); the NPV was 92.3%. When the SLN algorithm was applied retrospectively the false negative rate was 0/31 (0%); the NPV was 100%. CONCLUSION: SLN mapping rates for high-risk cancers are slightly lower than in prior reports of lower risk cancers. The NPV of the SLN mapping alone is 92% and rises to 100% when the SLN algorithm is applied. Such results are acceptable and consistent with larger subsets of lower risk endometrial cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4941561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49415612016-07-22 Performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk endometrial cancer Ehrisman, Jessie Secord, Angeles Alvarez Berchuck, Andrew Lee, Paula S. Di Santo, Nicola Lopez-Acevedo, Micael Broadwater, Gloria Valea, Fidel A. Havrilesky, Laura J. Gynecol Oncol Rep Case Series OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and performance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping among women with high-risk endometrial cancers. METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 with uterine cancer of grade 3 endometrioid, clear cell, serous or carcinosarcoma histology and who underwent SLN mapping prior to full pelvic lymph node dissection were included. Subjects underwent methylene blue or ICG injection for laparoscopic (N = 16) or robotic-assisted laparoscopic (N = 20) staging. Outcomes included SLN mapping rates, SLN and non-SLN positive rates, false negative SLN algorithm rate, and the negative predictive value (NPV) of the SLN algorithm. Fisher's exact test was used to compare mapping and node positivity rates. RESULTS: 9/36 (25%) patients with high-risk uterine cancer had at least one metastatic lymph node identified. Successful mapping occurred in 30/36 (83%) patients. SLN mapped to pelvic nodes bilaterally in 20 (56%), unilaterally in 9 (25%), and aortic nodes only in 1 (3%). Malignancy was identified in 14/95 (15%) of all sentinel nodes and 12/775 (1.5%) of all non-sentinel nodes (p < 0.001). The false negative rate of SLN mapping alone was 2/26 (7.7%); the NPV was 92.3%. When the SLN algorithm was applied retrospectively the false negative rate was 0/31 (0%); the NPV was 100%. CONCLUSION: SLN mapping rates for high-risk cancers are slightly lower than in prior reports of lower risk cancers. The NPV of the SLN mapping alone is 92% and rises to 100% when the SLN algorithm is applied. Such results are acceptable and consistent with larger subsets of lower risk endometrial cancers. Elsevier 2016-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4941561/ /pubmed/27453926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2016.04.002 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
Ehrisman, Jessie
Secord, Angeles Alvarez
Berchuck, Andrew
Lee, Paula S.
Di Santo, Nicola
Lopez-Acevedo, Micael
Broadwater, Gloria
Valea, Fidel A.
Havrilesky, Laura J.
Performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk endometrial cancer
title Performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk endometrial cancer
title_full Performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk endometrial cancer
title_fullStr Performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk endometrial cancer
title_full_unstemmed Performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk endometrial cancer
title_short Performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk endometrial cancer
title_sort performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk endometrial cancer
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2016.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT ehrismanjessie performanceofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinhighriskendometrialcancer
AT secordangelesalvarez performanceofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinhighriskendometrialcancer
AT berchuckandrew performanceofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinhighriskendometrialcancer
AT leepaulas performanceofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinhighriskendometrialcancer
AT disantonicola performanceofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinhighriskendometrialcancer
AT lopezacevedomicael performanceofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinhighriskendometrialcancer
AT broadwatergloria performanceofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinhighriskendometrialcancer
AT valeafidela performanceofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinhighriskendometrialcancer
AT havrileskylauraj performanceofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinhighriskendometrialcancer