Cargando…

The receptor preference of influenza viruses

Please cite this paper as: Meng et al. (2010) The receptor preference of influenza viruses. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 4(3), 147–153. Objectives  The cell surface receptor used by an influenza virus to infect that cell is an N‐acetyl neuraminic acid (NANA) residue terminally linked by a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Bo, Marriott, Anthony C., Dimmock, Nigel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20409211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00130.x
_version_ 1782442330616233984
author Meng, Bo
Marriott, Anthony C.
Dimmock, Nigel J.
author_facet Meng, Bo
Marriott, Anthony C.
Dimmock, Nigel J.
author_sort Meng, Bo
collection PubMed
description Please cite this paper as: Meng et al. (2010) The receptor preference of influenza viruses. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 4(3), 147–153. Objectives  The cell surface receptor used by an influenza virus to infect that cell is an N‐acetyl neuraminic acid (NANA) residue terminally linked by an alpha2,3 or alpha2,6 bond to a carbohydrate moiety of a glycoprotein or glycolipid. Our aim was to determine a quick and technically simple method to determine cell receptor usage by whole influenza A virus particles. Methods  We employed surface plasmon resonance to detect the binding of viruses to fetuin, a naturally occurring glycoprotein that has both alpha2,3‐ and alpha2,6‐linked NANA, and free 3′‐sialyllactose or 6′‐sialyllactose to compete virus binding. All virus stocks were produced in embryonated chicken’s eggs. Results  The influenza viruses tested bound preferentially to NANAalpha2,3Gal or to NANAalpha2,6Gal, or showed no preference. Two PR8 viruses had different binding preferences. Binding preferences of viruses correlated well with their known biological properties. Conclusions  Our data suggest that it is not easy to predict receptor usage by influenza viruses. However, direct experimental determination as described here can inform experiments concerned with viral pathogenesis, biology and structure. In principle, the methodology can be used for any virus that binds to a terminal NANA residue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4941662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49416622016-07-18 The receptor preference of influenza viruses Meng, Bo Marriott, Anthony C. Dimmock, Nigel J. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles Please cite this paper as: Meng et al. (2010) The receptor preference of influenza viruses. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 4(3), 147–153. Objectives  The cell surface receptor used by an influenza virus to infect that cell is an N‐acetyl neuraminic acid (NANA) residue terminally linked by an alpha2,3 or alpha2,6 bond to a carbohydrate moiety of a glycoprotein or glycolipid. Our aim was to determine a quick and technically simple method to determine cell receptor usage by whole influenza A virus particles. Methods  We employed surface plasmon resonance to detect the binding of viruses to fetuin, a naturally occurring glycoprotein that has both alpha2,3‐ and alpha2,6‐linked NANA, and free 3′‐sialyllactose or 6′‐sialyllactose to compete virus binding. All virus stocks were produced in embryonated chicken’s eggs. Results  The influenza viruses tested bound preferentially to NANAalpha2,3Gal or to NANAalpha2,6Gal, or showed no preference. Two PR8 viruses had different binding preferences. Binding preferences of viruses correlated well with their known biological properties. Conclusions  Our data suggest that it is not easy to predict receptor usage by influenza viruses. However, direct experimental determination as described here can inform experiments concerned with viral pathogenesis, biology and structure. In principle, the methodology can be used for any virus that binds to a terminal NANA residue. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010-03-17 2010-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4941662/ /pubmed/20409211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00130.x Text en © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Original Articles
Meng, Bo
Marriott, Anthony C.
Dimmock, Nigel J.
The receptor preference of influenza viruses
title The receptor preference of influenza viruses
title_full The receptor preference of influenza viruses
title_fullStr The receptor preference of influenza viruses
title_full_unstemmed The receptor preference of influenza viruses
title_short The receptor preference of influenza viruses
title_sort receptor preference of influenza viruses
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20409211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00130.x
work_keys_str_mv AT mengbo thereceptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses
AT marriottanthonyc thereceptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses
AT dimmocknigelj thereceptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses
AT mengbo receptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses
AT marriottanthonyc receptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses
AT dimmocknigelj receptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses