Cargando…
The receptor preference of influenza viruses
Please cite this paper as: Meng et al. (2010) The receptor preference of influenza viruses. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 4(3), 147–153. Objectives The cell surface receptor used by an influenza virus to infect that cell is an N‐acetyl neuraminic acid (NANA) residue terminally linked by a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20409211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00130.x |
_version_ | 1782442330616233984 |
---|---|
author | Meng, Bo Marriott, Anthony C. Dimmock, Nigel J. |
author_facet | Meng, Bo Marriott, Anthony C. Dimmock, Nigel J. |
author_sort | Meng, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Please cite this paper as: Meng et al. (2010) The receptor preference of influenza viruses. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 4(3), 147–153. Objectives The cell surface receptor used by an influenza virus to infect that cell is an N‐acetyl neuraminic acid (NANA) residue terminally linked by an alpha2,3 or alpha2,6 bond to a carbohydrate moiety of a glycoprotein or glycolipid. Our aim was to determine a quick and technically simple method to determine cell receptor usage by whole influenza A virus particles. Methods We employed surface plasmon resonance to detect the binding of viruses to fetuin, a naturally occurring glycoprotein that has both alpha2,3‐ and alpha2,6‐linked NANA, and free 3′‐sialyllactose or 6′‐sialyllactose to compete virus binding. All virus stocks were produced in embryonated chicken’s eggs. Results The influenza viruses tested bound preferentially to NANAalpha2,3Gal or to NANAalpha2,6Gal, or showed no preference. Two PR8 viruses had different binding preferences. Binding preferences of viruses correlated well with their known biological properties. Conclusions Our data suggest that it is not easy to predict receptor usage by influenza viruses. However, direct experimental determination as described here can inform experiments concerned with viral pathogenesis, biology and structure. In principle, the methodology can be used for any virus that binds to a terminal NANA residue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4941662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49416622016-07-18 The receptor preference of influenza viruses Meng, Bo Marriott, Anthony C. Dimmock, Nigel J. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles Please cite this paper as: Meng et al. (2010) The receptor preference of influenza viruses. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 4(3), 147–153. Objectives The cell surface receptor used by an influenza virus to infect that cell is an N‐acetyl neuraminic acid (NANA) residue terminally linked by an alpha2,3 or alpha2,6 bond to a carbohydrate moiety of a glycoprotein or glycolipid. Our aim was to determine a quick and technically simple method to determine cell receptor usage by whole influenza A virus particles. Methods We employed surface plasmon resonance to detect the binding of viruses to fetuin, a naturally occurring glycoprotein that has both alpha2,3‐ and alpha2,6‐linked NANA, and free 3′‐sialyllactose or 6′‐sialyllactose to compete virus binding. All virus stocks were produced in embryonated chicken’s eggs. Results The influenza viruses tested bound preferentially to NANAalpha2,3Gal or to NANAalpha2,6Gal, or showed no preference. Two PR8 viruses had different binding preferences. Binding preferences of viruses correlated well with their known biological properties. Conclusions Our data suggest that it is not easy to predict receptor usage by influenza viruses. However, direct experimental determination as described here can inform experiments concerned with viral pathogenesis, biology and structure. In principle, the methodology can be used for any virus that binds to a terminal NANA residue. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010-03-17 2010-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4941662/ /pubmed/20409211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00130.x Text en © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Meng, Bo Marriott, Anthony C. Dimmock, Nigel J. The receptor preference of influenza viruses |
title | The receptor preference of influenza viruses |
title_full | The receptor preference of influenza viruses |
title_fullStr | The receptor preference of influenza viruses |
title_full_unstemmed | The receptor preference of influenza viruses |
title_short | The receptor preference of influenza viruses |
title_sort | receptor preference of influenza viruses |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20409211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00130.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mengbo thereceptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses AT marriottanthonyc thereceptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses AT dimmocknigelj thereceptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses AT mengbo receptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses AT marriottanthonyc receptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses AT dimmocknigelj receptorpreferenceofinfluenzaviruses |