Cargando…

Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models (Testing of killed and live H5 vaccine)

Please cite this paper as: Gambaryan et al. (2011) Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models. Parallel testing of killed and live H5 vaccine. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(3), 188–195. Objective  Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gambaryan, Alexandra S., Lomakina, Natalia F., Boravleva, Elizaveta Y., Kropotkina, Ekaterina A., Mashin, Vadim V., Krasilnikov, Igor V., Klimov, Alexander I., Rudenko, Larisa G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21951678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00291.x
_version_ 1782442331962605568
author Gambaryan, Alexandra S.
Lomakina, Natalia F.
Boravleva, Elizaveta Y.
Kropotkina, Ekaterina A.
Mashin, Vadim V.
Krasilnikov, Igor V.
Klimov, Alexander I.
Rudenko, Larisa G.
author_facet Gambaryan, Alexandra S.
Lomakina, Natalia F.
Boravleva, Elizaveta Y.
Kropotkina, Ekaterina A.
Mashin, Vadim V.
Krasilnikov, Igor V.
Klimov, Alexander I.
Rudenko, Larisa G.
author_sort Gambaryan, Alexandra S.
collection PubMed
description Please cite this paper as: Gambaryan et al. (2011) Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models. Parallel testing of killed and live H5 vaccine. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(3), 188–195. Objective  Parallel testing of inactivated (split and whole virion) and live vaccine was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and protective efficacy against homologous and heterosubtypic challenge by H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. Method  Four experimental live vaccines based on two H5N1 influenza virus strains were tested; two of them had hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Vietnam/1203/04 strain lacking the polybasic HA cleavage site, and two others had hemagglutinins from attenuated H5N1 virus A/Chicken/Kurgan/3/05, with amino acid substitutions of Asp54/Asn and Lys222/Thr in HA1 and Val48/Ile and Lys131/Thr in HA2 while maintaining the polybasic HA cleavage site. The neuraminidase and non‐glycoprotein genes of the experimental live vaccines were from H2N2 cold‐adapted master strain A/Leningrad/134/17/57 (VN‐Len and Ku‐Len) or from the apathogenic H6N2 virus A/Gull/Moscow/3100/2006 (VN‐Gull and Ku‐Gull). Inactivated H5N1 and H1N1 and live H1N1 vaccine were used for comparison. All vaccines were applied in a single dose. Safety, immunogenicity, and protectivity against the challenge with HPAI H5N1 virus A/Chicken/Kurgan/3/05 were estimated. Results  All experimental live H5 vaccines tested were apathogenic as determined by weight loss and conferred more than 90% protection against lethal challenge with A/Chicken/Kurgan/3/05 infection. Inactivated H1N1 vaccine in mice offered no protection against challenge with H5N1 virus, while live cold‐adapted H1N1 vaccine reduced the mortality near to zero level. Conclusions  The high yield, safety, and protectivity of VN‐Len and Ku‐Len made them promising strains for the production of inactivated and live vaccines against H5N1 viruses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4941668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49416682016-07-18 Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models (Testing of killed and live H5 vaccine) Gambaryan, Alexandra S. Lomakina, Natalia F. Boravleva, Elizaveta Y. Kropotkina, Ekaterina A. Mashin, Vadim V. Krasilnikov, Igor V. Klimov, Alexander I. Rudenko, Larisa G. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Part 1 Please cite this paper as: Gambaryan et al. (2011) Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models. Parallel testing of killed and live H5 vaccine. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(3), 188–195. Objective  Parallel testing of inactivated (split and whole virion) and live vaccine was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and protective efficacy against homologous and heterosubtypic challenge by H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. Method  Four experimental live vaccines based on two H5N1 influenza virus strains were tested; two of them had hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Vietnam/1203/04 strain lacking the polybasic HA cleavage site, and two others had hemagglutinins from attenuated H5N1 virus A/Chicken/Kurgan/3/05, with amino acid substitutions of Asp54/Asn and Lys222/Thr in HA1 and Val48/Ile and Lys131/Thr in HA2 while maintaining the polybasic HA cleavage site. The neuraminidase and non‐glycoprotein genes of the experimental live vaccines were from H2N2 cold‐adapted master strain A/Leningrad/134/17/57 (VN‐Len and Ku‐Len) or from the apathogenic H6N2 virus A/Gull/Moscow/3100/2006 (VN‐Gull and Ku‐Gull). Inactivated H5N1 and H1N1 and live H1N1 vaccine were used for comparison. All vaccines were applied in a single dose. Safety, immunogenicity, and protectivity against the challenge with HPAI H5N1 virus A/Chicken/Kurgan/3/05 were estimated. Results  All experimental live H5 vaccines tested were apathogenic as determined by weight loss and conferred more than 90% protection against lethal challenge with A/Chicken/Kurgan/3/05 infection. Inactivated H1N1 vaccine in mice offered no protection against challenge with H5N1 virus, while live cold‐adapted H1N1 vaccine reduced the mortality near to zero level. Conclusions  The high yield, safety, and protectivity of VN‐Len and Ku‐Len made them promising strains for the production of inactivated and live vaccines against H5N1 viruses. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011-09-23 2012-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4941668/ /pubmed/21951678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00291.x Text en © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Part 1
Gambaryan, Alexandra S.
Lomakina, Natalia F.
Boravleva, Elizaveta Y.
Kropotkina, Ekaterina A.
Mashin, Vadim V.
Krasilnikov, Igor V.
Klimov, Alexander I.
Rudenko, Larisa G.
Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models (Testing of killed and live H5 vaccine)
title Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models (Testing of killed and live H5 vaccine)
title_full Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models (Testing of killed and live H5 vaccine)
title_fullStr Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models (Testing of killed and live H5 vaccine)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models (Testing of killed and live H5 vaccine)
title_short Comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐H5N1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models (Testing of killed and live H5 vaccine)
title_sort comparative safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of several anti‐h5n1 influenza experimental vaccines in a mouse and chicken models (testing of killed and live h5 vaccine)
topic Part 1
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21951678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00291.x
work_keys_str_mv AT gambaryanalexandras comparativesafetyimmunogenicityandefficacyofseveralantih5n1influenzaexperimentalvaccinesinamouseandchickenmodelstestingofkilledandliveh5vaccine
AT lomakinanataliaf comparativesafetyimmunogenicityandefficacyofseveralantih5n1influenzaexperimentalvaccinesinamouseandchickenmodelstestingofkilledandliveh5vaccine
AT boravlevaelizavetay comparativesafetyimmunogenicityandefficacyofseveralantih5n1influenzaexperimentalvaccinesinamouseandchickenmodelstestingofkilledandliveh5vaccine
AT kropotkinaekaterinaa comparativesafetyimmunogenicityandefficacyofseveralantih5n1influenzaexperimentalvaccinesinamouseandchickenmodelstestingofkilledandliveh5vaccine
AT mashinvadimv comparativesafetyimmunogenicityandefficacyofseveralantih5n1influenzaexperimentalvaccinesinamouseandchickenmodelstestingofkilledandliveh5vaccine
AT krasilnikovigorv comparativesafetyimmunogenicityandefficacyofseveralantih5n1influenzaexperimentalvaccinesinamouseandchickenmodelstestingofkilledandliveh5vaccine
AT klimovalexanderi comparativesafetyimmunogenicityandefficacyofseveralantih5n1influenzaexperimentalvaccinesinamouseandchickenmodelstestingofkilledandliveh5vaccine
AT rudenkolarisag comparativesafetyimmunogenicityandefficacyofseveralantih5n1influenzaexperimentalvaccinesinamouseandchickenmodelstestingofkilledandliveh5vaccine