Cargando…

The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents

Background: Powered flight is implicated as a major driver for the success of birds. Here we examine the effectiveness of three hypothesized pathways for the evolution of the flight stroke, the forelimb motion that powers aerial locomotion, in a terrestrial setting across a range of stem and basal a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dececchi, T. Alexander, Larsson, Hans C.E., Habib, Michael B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27441115
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2159
_version_ 1782442348406374400
author Dececchi, T. Alexander
Larsson, Hans C.E.
Habib, Michael B.
author_facet Dececchi, T. Alexander
Larsson, Hans C.E.
Habib, Michael B.
author_sort Dececchi, T. Alexander
collection PubMed
description Background: Powered flight is implicated as a major driver for the success of birds. Here we examine the effectiveness of three hypothesized pathways for the evolution of the flight stroke, the forelimb motion that powers aerial locomotion, in a terrestrial setting across a range of stem and basal avians: flap running, Wing Assisted Incline Running (WAIR), and wing-assisted leaping. Methods: Using biomechanical mathematical models based on known aerodynamic principals and in vivo experiments and ground truthed using extant avians we seek to test if an incipient flight stroke may have contributed sufficient force to permit flap running, WAIR, or leaping takeoff along the phylogenetic lineage from Coelurosauria to birds. Results: None of these behaviours were found to meet the biomechanical threshold requirements before Paraves. Neither was there a continuous trend of refinement for any of these biomechanical performances across phylogeny nor a signal of universal applicability near the origin of birds. None of these flap-based locomotory models appear to have been a major influence on pre-flight character acquisition such as pennaceous feathers, suggesting non-locomotory behaviours, and less stringent locomotory behaviours such as balancing and braking, played a role in the evolution of the maniraptoran wing and nascent flight stroke. We find no support for widespread prevalence of WAIR in non-avian theropods, but can’t reject its presence in large winged, small-bodied taxa like Microraptor and Archaeopteryx. Discussion: Using our first principles approach we find that “near flight” locomotor behaviors are most sensitive to wing area, and that non-locomotory related selection regimes likely expanded wing area well before WAIR and other such behaviors were possible in derived avians. These results suggest that investigations of the drivers for wing expansion and feather elongation in theropods need not be intrinsically linked to locomotory adaptations, and this separation is critical for our understanding of the origin of powered flight and avian evolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4941780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49417802016-07-20 The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents Dececchi, T. Alexander Larsson, Hans C.E. Habib, Michael B. PeerJ Evolutionary Studies Background: Powered flight is implicated as a major driver for the success of birds. Here we examine the effectiveness of three hypothesized pathways for the evolution of the flight stroke, the forelimb motion that powers aerial locomotion, in a terrestrial setting across a range of stem and basal avians: flap running, Wing Assisted Incline Running (WAIR), and wing-assisted leaping. Methods: Using biomechanical mathematical models based on known aerodynamic principals and in vivo experiments and ground truthed using extant avians we seek to test if an incipient flight stroke may have contributed sufficient force to permit flap running, WAIR, or leaping takeoff along the phylogenetic lineage from Coelurosauria to birds. Results: None of these behaviours were found to meet the biomechanical threshold requirements before Paraves. Neither was there a continuous trend of refinement for any of these biomechanical performances across phylogeny nor a signal of universal applicability near the origin of birds. None of these flap-based locomotory models appear to have been a major influence on pre-flight character acquisition such as pennaceous feathers, suggesting non-locomotory behaviours, and less stringent locomotory behaviours such as balancing and braking, played a role in the evolution of the maniraptoran wing and nascent flight stroke. We find no support for widespread prevalence of WAIR in non-avian theropods, but can’t reject its presence in large winged, small-bodied taxa like Microraptor and Archaeopteryx. Discussion: Using our first principles approach we find that “near flight” locomotor behaviors are most sensitive to wing area, and that non-locomotory related selection regimes likely expanded wing area well before WAIR and other such behaviors were possible in derived avians. These results suggest that investigations of the drivers for wing expansion and feather elongation in theropods need not be intrinsically linked to locomotory adaptations, and this separation is critical for our understanding of the origin of powered flight and avian evolution. PeerJ Inc. 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4941780/ /pubmed/27441115 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2159 Text en © 2016 Dececchi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Evolutionary Studies
Dececchi, T. Alexander
Larsson, Hans C.E.
Habib, Michael B.
The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents
title The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents
title_full The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents
title_fullStr The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents
title_full_unstemmed The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents
title_short The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents
title_sort wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents
topic Evolutionary Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27441115
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2159
work_keys_str_mv AT dececchitalexander thewingsbeforethebirdanevaluationofflappingbasedlocomotoryhypothesesinbirdantecedents
AT larssonhansce thewingsbeforethebirdanevaluationofflappingbasedlocomotoryhypothesesinbirdantecedents
AT habibmichaelb thewingsbeforethebirdanevaluationofflappingbasedlocomotoryhypothesesinbirdantecedents
AT dececchitalexander wingsbeforethebirdanevaluationofflappingbasedlocomotoryhypothesesinbirdantecedents
AT larssonhansce wingsbeforethebirdanevaluationofflappingbasedlocomotoryhypothesesinbirdantecedents
AT habibmichaelb wingsbeforethebirdanevaluationofflappingbasedlocomotoryhypothesesinbirdantecedents